|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
180
   |
Posted - 2013.10.15 08:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Shogen Shu wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:meri jin wrote:@Dovallis I'm ignoring you from this point, flat word, one video comparing and so on. claiming 30% from one video is ridicules. This is not a proper analysis. You're the only one who said it was from one video. If you're not willing to do some research for yourself you have no right to debunk mine, even if it is heavily faulty. Because it is heavily faulty, no one cares. Your data is useless, please don't mention it again. No sources, only text. Btw: Mass Driver improved over 35%, I have some data collected, but I'm not going to show you. Just believe me!
I'm quoting you for the sheer stupidity of the obvious trolling.
He was asked to check this discrepancy for himself not to "just blindly believe".
Mass driver has no issues with explosion damage being calculated in varying formats. There is no Bullet Ignore, nor magentism. Even Latency can be ignored by venture of the AoE.
The only issue explosions have are those invisible walls, but they are still there and not fixed in the least.
One does not even have to enter the game to realize you're spewing nonsense. |
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
180
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 08:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Mo Gallas Gentralde wrote:Shogen Shu wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:meri jin wrote:@Dovallis I'm ignoring you from this point, flat word, one video comparing and so on. claiming 30% from one video is ridicules. This is not a proper analysis. You're the only one who said it was from one video. If you're not willing to do some research for yourself you have no right to debunk mine, even if it is heavily faulty. Because it is heavily faulty, no one cares. Your data is useless, please don't mention it again. No sources, only text. Btw: Mass Driver improved over 35%, I have some data collected, but I'm not going to show you. Just believe me! I'm quoting you for the sheer stupidity of the obvious trolling. He was asked to check this discrepancy for himself not to "just blindly believe". Mass driver has no issues with explosion damage being calculated in varying formats. There is no Bullet Ignore, nor magentism. Even Latency can be ignored by venture of the AoE. The only issue explosions have are those invisible walls, but they are still there and not fixed in the least. One does not even have to enter the game to realize you're spewing nonsense. So if my grenades kills you heavy in one explosion that is ok ? Because if you nerf my AR that is exactly what is going to happen, i going to use the grenades as a primary weapon, and the MD as a secondary. At least with the AR you have half of a chance. 
I have a greater chance surviving a grenade than an AR to be honest. I'll take your grenade any day, cause I use cover. |
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
180
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 08:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shogen Shu wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:It did receive a 30% damage buff with hit detection.
I'm not surprised that the people who want the "easy mode guns" want to defend this tooth and nail. :/ @Mo Gallas Gentralde Here on the first page, where he is collecting likes, he is asking to "just blindly believe". No source, not mentioning that the only data on this is "somewhere" on his HHD. And you should have noticed that my mass driver was only a example on what he did. Tossing numbers in the room without and claiming them as a total.
So you're telling me that if he/she had posted a link to an entirely fake listing of 'tested encounters" all formatted neatly and in little rows, that you would have believed that? Seriously?
At least there was honesty in the posts if you bothered to read onward, if nothing else. |
|
|
| |
|