|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1024
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 00:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think a tank did something naughty to him.
I'm still extending my offer to you. You can pilot one of my tanks, rail, blaster or missile, for however long, and we'll analyze the game. 5 per day, but only games that have ADV AV or higher count towards that total.
Afterwards, I'll make a post on here about it telling everyone how you did. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1024
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 00:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
IrishWebster wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Let's just ignore vehicles for this example, and focus on infantry vs infantry in a parallel universe.
Imagine this:
In this universe, suits need to be taken out with very specific weapons. No exception. If you don't have the right weapon to take out that suit, you are absolutely screwed. They can stand there and take it all night long while you dish it out.
Example:
- Player A has weapons designed to take out ADV suits, but ADV suits only. If militia/STD or proto attack this player, the player is defenseless. Nothing they do will harm a militia/STD or proto suit in any way worth a damn.
- Player B has weapons designed to take out militia/STD, but is completely defenseless against ADV and proto suits.
- Player C has weapons designed to take out proto suits, but is absolutely helpless against ADV and militia/STD suits.
So would this be balanced, or completely unbalanced and ridiculous? Cause this is almost exactly what anti-vehicle and anti-infantry players have to deal with.
Anti-vehicle - Only good against vehciles, vulnerable vs infantry and vehicles. Anti-infantry- Only good against infantry, vulnerable vs vehicles and infantry.
And here's the vehicle players setup.
Anti-infantry & vehicle - Vulnerable only by AV players and some vehicles, but excellent against all vehicles and all infantry.
This is wrong and needs to change. Vehicles have way too much of an advantage. They should have to make hard choices like infantry players do.
Either:
1. Vehicles only good against other vehicles, but worthless against infantry 2. Vehicles only good against infantry, defenseless to other vehicles.
Or:
Infantry players need dedicated AV on all suits. Which means separate PG/CPU and slots for AV specific weaponry, this way infantry can carry both and be equally effective against vehicles and infantry. However the extra PG/CPU and slots can only be used for AV weapons (that way they can't be abused). Um... no. Show me ANY real life parallel to this argument and I'll agree. The point of a vehicle, and thus the enormous amount of SP and ISK spent to gain use of and continue to use a vehicle, is to gain an ADVANTAGE. They cost more than drop suits. They're more skill intensive than drop suits. They're harder to use than drop suits. They're easier to see and draw much more attention than drop suits. They don't only deserve the advantage, but they NEED one. Having a crapload of HP and native resistance to small arms fire only makes sense. After all, it is a TANK. Show me a real life tank that can even be remotely scratched by conventional small arms fire, and I'll submit to this argument. But you won't, and so neither will I. Thank you
+ 1 beer |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1024
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 00:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:Crash Monster wrote:I don't use tanks so the fact I'd like them to be like tanks and represent a scary badass on the battlefield has nothing to do with tankers asking for unreasonable things. Whats unreasonable is getting soloed by one person who cost 1/10 of you and getting killed by 3 grenades. SECOND |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1024
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 00:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:''Um... no. Show me ANY real life parallel to this argument and I'll agree. The point of a vehicle, and thus the enormous amount of SP and ISK spent to gain use of and continue to use a vehicle, is to gain an ADVANTAGE.''
The point of AV is to have a counter against that advantage , without the enormous cost.
:3
I see where the OP is coming from.He does have a point.
But at the same time me running with Swarms + SIX KIN SMG makes me useful vs infantry AND vehicles alike, im just sacrificing AI range.
Also people who main Plasma cannons+AV grenade+sidearm can damage everything in the game....
So meh. I wont discuss, i'll wait till vehicle/AV fix is here to rant again in the neverending vehicle vs AV war... Nice crutchlauncher |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1029
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 03:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:''Um... no. Show me ANY real life parallel to this argument and I'll agree. The point of a vehicle, and thus the enormous amount of SP and ISK spent to gain use of and continue to use a vehicle, is to gain an ADVANTAGE.''
The point of AV is to have a counter against that advantage , without the enormous cost.
:3
I see where the OP is coming from.He does have a point.
But at the same time me running with Swarms + SIX KIN SMG makes me useful vs infantry AND vehicles alike, im just sacrificing AI range.
Also people who main Plasma cannons+AV grenade+sidearm can damage everything in the game....
So meh. I wont discuss, i'll wait till vehicle/AV fix is here to rant again in the neverending vehicle vs AV war... Nice crutchlauncher But King you know swarms are broken as hell. Double DPS in prep for vehicle rebalance that never came.... now just double DPS, autolocking crutch launchers as Spkr says. IT IS TRUE, however; Armor repairers are broken as hell too,and i dont see tankers complaining about them. Broken vs Broken = weird balance. I mean if a tank can take 6 of MY Swarms , plus 4 proximity mines plus 2 packedgrenades in less than 30 secs.... see where im going? But this aspect of the game is OVERALL f***d up, no need to start fighting over this again,lets just leave it as it needs a fix. That just tells me you're doing it wrong by trying to solo a tanker. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1030
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 04:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:I think a tank did something naughty to him.
I'm still extending my offer to you. You can pilot one of my tanks, rail, blaster or missile, for however long, and we'll analyze the game. 5 per day, but only games that have ADV AV or higher count towards that total.
Afterwards, I'll make a post on here about it telling everyone how you did. I have the recording equipment available now... may not be the best for hi def but you can definitely see whats going on. I could keep the experience on visual and audio record It needs to be done. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote: Okay, so ~21k damage. Still not buying it.
Im not trying to convince you, your opinion is irrerelevant to me.You are a biased tanker LOL math is biased against your biased opinion LOL
Man, I wish I did well in math in school. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Void Echo wrote: btw... who was the ****** that liked lukboy's post?
You were replying to him. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
its called hardeners and reps.... and your swarm skill not being high enough. it normally takes about 3 volleys for someone to take down an average tanker if hes alone, it only takes one volley if there are multiple swarmers present...
teamwork and skill level are how your meant to kill us, not solo tactics with militia gear
Not being high enough? I have Prof 4 and 2 CX damage mods. I dont use MLT gear and you know it. ''teamwork and skill level are how your meant to kill us''But for tankers to run solo is fair right?.... Heh i know where this is going. So teamwork for tankers, but none for AV. Got it.
I love double standards, don't you? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:True Adamance wrote:
Super powerful armour reppers are all that's keeping tankers in business, saving those canny shield tankers I hate so much.
AHA.so THEY ARE in business... They dont get 1 shotted as (not you adamance) some tankers claim by AV. Case rest. ''I'd love to have you in my tank checkmate, but you wouldn't want to spend all of your time sitting as a gunner, that's not interesting gameplay for you is it?''I would , but dont think im going to think they are UP unless we get 1 HKOd by AV XD Wiyrkomi with proficiency 5 and 2 complex damage mods could put out a lot of damage to the weak spot. |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
yeah, I know you don't use it, im just using that as an example for most of the people that come to the forums complaining about not being able to solo us with militia gear. sorry if that offended you in any way.... but you are in the wrong if you want us to submit to being soloed by anyone.
-I must admit, i WAS trying to solo the tank. Because i was playing solo and my team was just getting massacred by the tank. I there by used STRATEGY (there by the Ambush i plannedfor the tank) and i think Strategy should always prevail,over everything.No it not offended my,i thought YOU thought i was trying to solo a tank with MLT gear.no harm done.
well... considering that it takes over 10x more SP and ISK for us to deploy tanks on the field than you need for fitting your dropsuits... yeah I do believe we earn the privilege of being able to survive alone (notice for once you idiot that im saying survive and not dominate you blind bastard)... that being said, the investment we make towards HAVs is far grater than your investment into infantry stuff along with how hard it is to stay alive at all during any given moment when we are piloting gives you the idea that this class should have the survival advantage over any other class that tries to go solo.
So you are saying Players with More SP and more ISK deserve to have a natural advantage over low level players? more than they have already?:''considering that it takes over 10x more SP and ISK for us to deploy tanks on the field than you need for fitting your dropsuits... yeah I do believe we earn the privilege of being able to survive alone''
This is what i understand by this statement.Consider this,if after 15 million the best way to survive SOLO is a tank...dont you think it will become the NEW FOTM? So basically, If players are high SP and they want to play solo,the best way is tanking then. ok good to know void...I actually thought for a second this was going to be a TEAM BASED GAME where WITHOUT A TEAM you are F***d. but ok. Thanks for the civil response BTW...
LOL @ an entirely different play style becoming flavor of the month. LOL! |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Void Echo wrote:
1-it would be awesome if more people skilled into tanks, I would have tons more fun battling other tankers than I do now because of you AVers getting in the way of trying to have fun here.. I say let more people skill into tanks, should revive the game for more aged tankers like myself.
2-in my truly honest opinion about all the classes in the game, the more of a personal investment you make in a certain class SP wise should grant you the right and privilege to outperform all other players in other classes and your own that have not put as much personal investment in their own classes as you have done for yours...
3-ex: a 17 Mil total SP tanker (myself) should definitely out perform a single av guy with less than 5 mil SP in AV mainly because... well I put much more time and investment into tanks than hes done for AV...
3-ex 2: a 6 mil SP sniper should out perform a 2 mil SP AR mainly because the sniper put more time and investment into sniping than the AR user did for his own class.
get it yet?
4-in all of human history including new eden, personal investment and time put in have always come out on top and out performed everyone and everything that has not done the same ore similar.... those that do are called competitors and the human life span drives off this basic survival instinct, to out perform the competitors and everyone else in order to survive.
1-Again beinga little selfish here aint ya' . What about us Infantry trying to have fun vs other infantry instead of having to worry about tanks? Biased thought is biased. 2-So basically,if i run proto gear i shoudlnt be able to get killed by MLT/STD gear at all.By your reasoning..hmm..Proto suits / weapons / gear might be UNDERPOWERED then... 3-I get it. But what you are saying is RPG / MMORP thought. This is a FPS, balance means that with skill, you can take out another player REGARDLESS of time invested in the game. If gear/time invested is always going to tryumph over skill, its not balance. 4- same as 3. @ adamance ''1-Yes Tank users should have a natural advantage over infantry, its the purpose for deploying a tank.
2-E.G- Take 2 500k SP toons. One pays 300K for his MLT tank, one uses a free MLT fit. Why does the AV have a natural advantage over the Tanker when they spent no ISK or SP to achieve that?''1- So should AV then have a natural advantage over vehicles,since its designed for that purpose. 2-Because its designed to take out tanks.Same as a MLT tank can kill any PROTO if he is not carrying AV weaponry. You can have fun on Call of Duty without having to worry about vehicles. You can have fun on some BF3 modes without having to worry about vehicles. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:44:00 -
[13] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:So should AV then have a natural advantage over vehicles,since its designed for that purpose. Because its designed to take out tanks.Same as a MLT tank can kill any PROTO if he is not carrying AV weaponry. Are you implying that a MLT tank shouldn't be able to kill someone in a PRO suit if the PRO guy doesn't have any AV? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cy Clone1 wrote:True Adamance wrote:Cy Clone1 wrote:i feel for the infantry.it does seem a little silly that tanks can go into almost any match and pull off 25+-0 games and I always play by myself. Proto av can obviously stop me, but I expect it too and I can still manage to get good scores. I think the only time I really get completely ticked is when they have fully dedicated squads or have unfair vantage points. All talk about how it is now is a little pointless. Best to wait and see how the new changes play out. Which I have come to kinda like. Why? I can walk into matches and have games better than I ever would have done in a tank. really, using what? I have yet to come close to a 5000 wp game with my logi character. 25's more of a low average. I also think it requires considerably less skill to pilot tanks. A few learning experiences, and some situational awareness and your good to go. The problem with tanks is that good builds are really set in stone. once you meet the requirements for them you can go around slaughtering infantry. Less skill? It takes exactly 0 to lock on to a vehicle with a swarm launcher. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Just destroying turrets a Tanker can do 800-1000 Wp in less than 2 minutes. Just saying.... You know a way to one-shot installations while having infinite NOS? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: That just tells me you're doing it wrong by trying to solo a tanker.
Same goes for tankers trying to solo enemy teams with proto AVers.... Have you ever, ever been in a squad with tankers? And I don't mean some guy new to the game trying out MLT tanks, or someone with 200,000 SP into vehicle upgrades. I'm talking about pilots with 12mil and up into vehicles, people whose main role in Dust is as a pilot. Do you have any type of experience like that? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 06:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:
I bet that if True Adamance+Void Echo+TheLegend were in a match vs you,you wouldnt be able to drop a single one of them solo....
3-im trying to reach an agreement here with the tankers, you are just trying to provoque me,and will fail.Im in too good of a mood today bro.
Are you actually admitting that there are intelligent tankers, more so intelligent than infantry? |
|
|
|