You're trying to get them nerfed again? Good god some people just don't know when to quit lol

Lol, again with the tanks? My tank easily gets destroyed by anybody worrying about it. Likewise, the only people that die by my tank are ppl who are out in the open jumping around it.

If anything just nerf the tracking on the blaster turret.

You're trying to get them nerfed again?

But King you know swarms are broken as hell. Double DPS in prep for vehicle rebalance that never came.... now just double DPS, autolocking crutch launchers as Spkr says.

Let's just ignore vehicles for this example, and focus on infantry vs infantry in a parallel universe.

Imagine this:

In this universe, suits need to be taken out with very specific weapons. No exception. If you don't have the right weapon to take out that suit, you are absolutely screwed. They can stand there and take it all night long while you dish it out.

Example:

- Player A has weapons designed to take out ADV suits, but ADV suits only. If militia/STD or proto attack this player, the player is defenseless. Nothing they do will harm a militia/STD or proto suit in any way worth a damn.

- Player B has weapons designed to take out militia/STD, but is completely defenseless against ADV and proto suits.

- Player C has weapons designed to take out proto suits, but is absolutely helpless against ADV and militia/STD suits.


So would this be balanced, or completely unbalanced and ridiculous? Cause this is almost exactly what anti-vehicle and anti-infantry players have to deal with.

Anti-vehicle - Only good against vehciles, vulnerable vs infantry and vehicles.
Anti-infantry- Only good against infantry, vulnerable vs vehicles and infantry.


And here's the vehicle players setup.

Anti-infantry & vehicle - Vulnerable only by AV players and some vehicles, but excellent against all vehicles and all infantry.


This is wrong and needs to change. Vehicles have way too much of an advantage. They should have to make hard choices like infantry players do.

Either:

1. Vehicles only good against other vehicles, but worthless against infantry
2. Vehicles only good against infantry, defenseless to other vehicles.

Or:

Infantry players need dedicated AV on all suits. Which means separate PG/CPU and slots for AV specific weaponry, this way infantry can carry both and be equally effective against vehicles and infantry. However the extra PG/CPU and slots can only be used for AV weapons (that way they can't be abused).

The only reason why armor repairers are still broken is because they are the only thing that keeps them alive, so invalid argument. Anyways, that's about (assuming PROTO swarms) ~25k damage, so I think you're lying.

Okay, so ~21k damage. Still not buying it.

I kill HAV's with my Wiki swarms on a daily basis. As a mater of fact, I just smashed 3 HAV's (one barely escaped) just 15 minutes ago in a PC. I also do Scout shotty/sniper. Lastly, I fly DS's, and drive LAV's as well, so I do a lot more than just drive HAV's. Come at me.

there are some situations...

tank v tank: armor has the advantage over shield, been that way for a while now and shield need to be buffed to be on par so they are at least viable for tank combat.

AV v tank: armor is at a big disadvantage because everything has explosive damage bonuses against armor, shield doesn't suffer this disadvantage.

It gets slightly compensated by the broken Rep modules.I agree without them maddys would be in the same situation as shield tanks

''that's why your in such a rational mood today''

That and the fact that (Godin was right) im not drunk, you see, i work in ... a place where i can drink while working....My line of work permits it.
But i got in a fight and i cant for at least 2 weeks , so im sober and i dont get pissed off easily there by dont end up talking without thinking...