Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3315
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 17:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1106
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC?
That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. |
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3315
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion.
Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1107
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D
It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid. |
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3315
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid.
Yeah, albeit it gets -really- difficult fighting over Alpha sometimes. Pretty much comes down to whoever gets the roof at the start of the match. |
crazy space 1
Unkn0wn Killers
1819
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid.
wait.... so... what is the skyfire battery building for then? When it was made where did it fit into the design for Planetary conquest? Or was it just made with no plans or intended goal down the line other than to be removed?
I hope it won't be removed completely, that's all |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1107
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid. wait.... so... what is the skyfire battery building for then? When it was made where did it fit into the design for Planetary conquest? Or was it just made with no plans or intended goal down the line other than to be removed? I hope it won't be removed completely, that's all
I don't have any specific details on that. It's original design and intent are from before my time starting here. I did arrive during its early development stage, but I never saw what documentation there may be about its full intent. |
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3315
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid. wait.... so... what is the skyfire battery building for then? When it was made where did it fit into the design for Planetary conquest? Or was it just made with no plans or intended goal down the line other than to be removed? I hope it won't be removed completely, that's all
It's being used as a placeholder for the Caldari Cargo Hub, it was made before the infrastructure for Planetary conquest was released. |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1107
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 05:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:In the event the Caldari get a legitimate Cargo Hub outpost, will the Orbital Artillery outpost still be in effect or will it be removed from PC? That is a decision that would be determined at a closer date to the possible occasion. Sounds good. Would really hate to see all that hard work be removed completely. You have this players vote to keep it in Faction Warfare/Pub matches at the very least =D It would seem wasteful. Though it can use a re-visit its self in terms of technical aspects and art style. The game play in it is fairly solid. wait.... so... what is the skyfire battery building for then? When it was made where did it fit into the design for Planetary conquest? Or was it just made with no plans or intended goal down the line other than to be removed? I hope it won't be removed completely, that's all It's being used as a placeholder for the Caldari Cargo Hub, it was made before the infrastructure for Planetary conquest was released. That in particular is correct and of course eventually it will be replaced with a proper Caldari Cargo Hub SI set. Though when that time comes the same question exists. I know that we prefer not to just "throw away" work, but it is unclear of the original OA's future at this very moment until we get closer to its replacement arriving. |
|
crazy space 1
Unkn0wn Killers
1820
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
you could always remove the cannon part and turn it into a cargo hub. So you don't have to throw away the map, plus you could take some time to make it better. Just seems like a waste to build that map in the 1st place. Plus you featured it in every trailer shooting eve ships out of the sky, what does it mean if you remove it?
|
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3315
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote: That in particular is correct and of course eventually it will be replaced with a proper Caldari Cargo Hub SI set. Though when that time comes the same question exists. I know that we prefer not to just "throw away" work, but it is unclear of the original OA's future at this very moment until we get closer to its replacement arriving.
Thanks for the consistent responses either way LogicLoop! Best Dust Dev =P |
Avallo Kantor
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
212
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 00:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:You could always remove the cannon part and turn it into a cargo hub so you don't have to throw away the map. Plus you could take some time to make it better, add stuff.
By the way... Dust 514 features the OA map in every trailer shooting eve ships out of the sky, what does it mean for the game if you remove it from the map pool?
I believe they are talking about it only in terms of removing it from PC, not pub matches.
On a side note, would it be possible to give the PC owners a "choice" of what Structure is used for a certain infrastructure?
For example have the Cargo hub infrastructure be able to be based on Map A or Map B?
(perhaps via a submenu, or perhaps more easily just have main options be Cargo Hub A, and Cargo Hub B)?
|
Joey-Number1
Maniacal Miners INC No Safe Haven
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 09:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
I love that map, please dont thorw it away, it adds much more diversity into map gameplay in the end. I ve had the best experiences right in this particular outpost. And I ll be honest it looks pretty awesome. |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1199
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 01:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Joey-Number1 wrote:I love that map, please dont thorw it away, it adds much more diversity into map gameplay in the end. I ve had the best experiences right in this particular outpost. And I ll be honest it looks pretty awesome.
Typically we will keep whats functional and use it. It would most likely go to public matches. What you have to realize is that we are using existing assets as placeholders for many of the SI Sets until the actual SI Sets are complete.
We really prefer not to just throw functional and working things away. So it always has a better chance of sticking around in some fashion unless it has problems (such as going over technical budget limits).
|
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3670
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 02:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:Joey-Number1 wrote:I love that map, please dont thorw it away, it adds much more diversity into map gameplay in the end. I ve had the best experiences right in this particular outpost. And I ll be honest it looks pretty awesome. Typically we will keep whats functional and use it. It would most likely go to public matches. What you have to realize is that we are using existing assets as placeholders for many of the SI Sets until the actual SI Sets are complete. We really prefer not to just throw functional and working things away. So it always has a better chance of sticking around in some fashion unless it has problems (such as going over technical budget limits).
So, I have to ask three questions:
- Manage to get Caldari Production Facility done for 1.7? Please say yes =D - Estimated point release for Minmatar Cargo Hub? - What's next after the Minmatar Cargo Hub?
ANON Diplomat // 3rd Place Winner of the Eight Thousand Suns Fiction Contest
|
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1207
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 03:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote: - Manage to get Caldari Production Facility done for 1.7? Please say yes =D
We are going through some optimization stuff right now with it. So this can not be confirmed at the moment.
Aeon Amadi wrote: - Estimated point release for Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Do not know at this moment.
Aeon Amadi wrote: - What's next after the Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
|
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3683
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 04:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: - Manage to get Caldari Production Facility done for 1.7? Please say yes =D
We are going through some optimization stuff right now with it. So this can not be confirmed at the moment. Aeon Amadi wrote: - Estimated point release for Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Do not know at this moment. Aeon Amadi wrote: - What's next after the Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
=<
Aeon Amadi uses 'hope', it's effects will be determined at a later date.
Either way, hope it gets finished by 1.7 x_X
ANON Diplomat // 3rd Place Winner of the Eight Thousand Suns Fiction Contest
|
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3817
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 04:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: - Manage to get Caldari Production Facility done for 1.7? Please say yes =D
We are going through some optimization stuff right now with it. So this can not be confirmed at the moment. Aeon Amadi wrote: - Estimated point release for Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Do not know at this moment. Aeon Amadi wrote: - What's next after the Minmatar Cargo Hub?
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set) =< Aeon Amadi uses 'hope', it's effects will be determined at a later date. Either way, hope it gets finished by 1.7 x_X SICK.
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
crazy space 1
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
1974
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel.
Please reconsider. |
|
CCP LogicLoop
C C P C C P Alliance
1215
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel. Please reconsider.
Not my decision to make. |
|
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3684
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 07:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel. Please reconsider. Not my decision to make.
Hrmm. Ams can has votes on what comes after Orbital Artillery revamp?
ANON Diplomat // 3rd Place Winner of the Eight Thousand Suns Fiction Contest
|
Zeylon Rho
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
3043
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 15:57:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP LogicLoop wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel. Please reconsider. Not my decision to make.
I never get enough of this. LogicLoop comes to a thread, and ANSWERS ANSWERS ANSWERS. No BS, just BAM BAM BAM. So satisfy. Much info. Wow.
Join my cult.
|
Gorra Snell
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
218
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 22:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
Zeylon Rho wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel. Please reconsider. Not my decision to make. I never get enough of this. LogicLoop comes to a thread, and ANSWERS ANSWERS ANSWERS. No BS, just BAM BAM BAM. So satisfy. Much info. Wow.
I, too, would like to express my gratitude to Logicloop for his responsiveness. However, I think it should come to the attention of whoever's decision this IS to make that the continual focus on Galente and Caldari structures is lamesauce. More variety, please! |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3685
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 00:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
Gorra Snell wrote:Zeylon Rho wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:CCP LogicLoop wrote:
Caldari Orbital Artillery (the actual SI Set)
seems like a huge waste when not having a single ammar environment cheapens the experince. Keeps the game in that beta unfinished feel. Please reconsider. Not my decision to make. I never get enough of this. LogicLoop comes to a thread, and ANSWERS ANSWERS ANSWERS. No BS, just BAM BAM BAM. So satisfy. Much info. Wow. I, too, would like to express my gratitude to Logicloop for his responsiveness. However, I think it should come to the attention of whoever's decision this IS to make that the continual focus on Galente and Caldari structures is lamesauce. More variety, please!
Honestly, it makes sense though because they have re-usable assets that they can use to speed up level design. Less unique structures means less waiting time for them to be rendered, textured, etc. So, we can wait a few months for a single Amarr SI set or we can wait a month or so for a new Gallente/Caldari one =D
But I agree, the faster they roll out the first Minmatar/Amarr SI sets the faster it will be for later on ^_^
ANON Diplomat // 3rd Place Winner of the Eight Thousand Suns Fiction Contest
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |