| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ghost Duff
Science For Death
The Shadow Eclipse
0
   |
Posted - 2013.10.09 20:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I know you gave 5 points for equipment destruction,, how about 10 points if we hack it,, and if the enemy go to hack it back it explodes killing the person for a bonus 25 points.. so in total you get 35 points for actually hacking equipment which gets re-hacked,, its just a idea that i came up with..
Lets see what everyone else thinks !! |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
245
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 20:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'll support a equipment hacking mechanic the second I can put on the dropsuit/weapons of a merc I just killed. Until then, if you want to earn WP for equipment usage, skill into it yourself. |
forteXVI
89th IMMORTAL ORDER
97
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 21:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:I'll support a equipment hacking mechanic the second I can put on the dropsuit/weapons of a merc I just killed. Until then, if you want to earn WP for equipment usage, skill into it yourself.
or rather, the ability to pick up the weapons from the enemy you killed as long as you have skilled into them?
yet unable to pick up guns from a higher skill level |
Goric Rumis
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
218
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 21:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Not only does hacking equipment open up a lot more potential for abuse, but wasting the time to hack disposable equipment prevents that person from contributing in more meaningful ways and opens them up to being shot in the back while they're distracted.
Maybe--maybe--we allow people to hack equipment that they have the skill to use. But don't give them WP for it, because chances are good they're not helping the fight, and if they are they'll get WP as if they deployed the equipment anyway.
And as to your last point, why would anyone go back to re-hack their equipment if it was just going to blow up and kill them? |
Ghost Duff
Science For Death
The Shadow Eclipse
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 18:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Goric Rumis wrote:Not only does hacking equipment open up a lot more potential for abuse, but wasting the time to hack disposable equipment prevents that person from contributing in more meaningful ways and opens them up to being shot in the back while they're distracted.
Maybe--maybe--we allow people to hack equipment that they have the skill to use. But don't give them WP for it, because chances are good they're not helping the fight, and if they are they'll get WP as if they deployed the equipment anyway.
And as to your last point, why would anyone go back to re-hack their equipment if it was just going to blow up and kill them?
I see your point in regards people re hacking it.. i meant other people who re hack it get blown up.. just means theres more things to do on the battlefield,, instead of getting proto stomped 90% of the time.. which helps noobs gain sp to level up.. |
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division
151
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 19:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
+1 to original hacking idea. We need to give people a reason to think about where they put equipments. Nanohive hell, uplink spam, yadda yadda. What if we could take them for our own? As for rehacking the equipment back, i think that if an equipment lasts that long, then it would be quite pointless to begin with. |
Talos Vagheitan
King Slayers
112
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
+1 To hacking equipment.
For it exploding and killing ppl... not so much. |
Jadu Wen
Xer Cloud Consortium
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 13:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
You should check out this thread on Using Radiation Zones to Curtail Drop Uplink Use. I think it's a novel way to recondition but not force players to discontinue uplink spam of objectives. Plus it creates a system for highly dynamic play. |
McFurious
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 20:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bump.
+1 equipment hacking.
Half Irish. Often angry.
Closed Beta Masshole
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |