DUST Search - So I tried Farframe and PS2

Rogatien Merc wrote:

Alpha 443-6732 wrote:

Michael Arck wrote:

Delusional?

You're delusional. It's called individualism. You should read up on it.

People are entitled to their opinions, but the quality of a game is objective, not subjective. Dust has horrible quality as a AAA game as it stands, in almost every direction. Yet I constantly see people implying that this game is somehow better (damage control, why else?) than its rival titles when, as it stands, it clearly isn't.

Not saying Dust isn't fun every now and then, but it currently is an over-glorified lobby shooter with broken gameplay and customization mechanics.

ever read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"? Ahh... Quality. Big smile

i think my post was the closest to fanboyism in this thread, and I specifically mentioned that it isn't "there yet" and that the thing that is a draw for me to this game is the potential which I admit is a 'pipe dream'. that said, I think CCP is the only company ballsy / insane enough to keep trudging along and realize the pipe dream for such a niche game. this game will never rival CoD, BF, or WoW as far as player count, but I am ok with that. it'll never rival BF for realism or CoD for QA/QC budget. the draw is new eden. it is a niche. the hope is persistent sci fi shooter integrally connected to spaceships. we'll see if we get there: but it's still free to play so... w/e... we play because we enjoy it, because Pavlov made us, and because we are bored with other things. I for one stopped playing The Last of Us halfway through and MAYBE I'll finish it in the next year. Dust I'll log into every day. To each his own.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Alpha 443-6732 PEN 15 CLUB 88	Posted - 2013.10.04 01:23:00 - [1] - Quote This thread reeks of delusional fanboyism.
Alpha 443-6732 PEN 15 CLUB 88	Posted - 2013.10.04 01:30:00 - [2] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Delusional? You're delusional. It's called individualism. You should read up on it. People are entitled to their opinions, but the quality of a game is objective, not subjective. Dust has horrible quality as a AAA game as it stands, in almost every direction. Yet I constantly see people implying that this game is somehow better (damage control, why else?) than its rival titles when, as it stands, it clearly isn't. Not saying Dust isn't fun every now and then, but it currently is an over-glorified lobby shooter with broken gameplay and customization mechanics.
Alpha 443-6732 PEN 15 CLUB 88	Posted - 2013.10.04 01:56:00 - [3] - Quote The legend345 wrote: Baal Roo wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Warframe is a PVE game at best PS2 is meh on PC but if its optomized for PS4 and runs smooth with minimal loading then it could be a good MAG replacement Why would putting the game on a less powerful system improve it? Not all pcs are powerful to run max settings for Planetside 2 thus not all pcs are more powerful then the ps4. The ones that are a over a grand. The ps4 will run Planetside 2 at max settings and not be well over a grand LOL. Plus all console games are made exactly to the specs of the console, unlike PCs. Console games can be made efficient with worse hardware, because the developer designs the game entirely with the console specs in mind.
Alpha 443-6732 PEN 15 CLUB 89	Posted - 2013.10.04 02:00:00 - [4] - Quote Rogatien Merc wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Delusional? You're delusional. It's called individualism. You should read up on it. People are entitled to their opinions, but the quality of a game is objective, not subjective. Dust has horrible quality as a AAA game as it stands, in almost every direction. Yet I constantly see people implying that this game is somehow better (damage control, why else?) than its rival titles when, as it stands, it clearly isn't. Not saying Dust isn't fun every now and then, but it currently is an over-glorified lobby shooter with broken gameplay and customization mechanics. ever read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"? Ahh... Quality. i think my post was the closest to fanboyism in this thread, and I specifically mentioned that it isn't "there yet" and that the thing that is a draw for me to this game is the potential which I admit is a 'pipe dream'. that said, I think CCP is the only company ballsy / insane enough to keep trudging along and realize the pipe dream for such a niche game. this game will never rival CoD, BF, or WoW as far as player count, but I am ok with that. it'll never rival BF for realism or CoD for QA/QC budget. the draw is new eden. it is a niche. the hope is persistent sci fi shooter integrally connected to spaceships. we'll see if we get there: but it's still free to play so... w/e... we play because we enjoy it, because Pavlov made us, and because we are bored with other things. I for one stopped playing The Last of Us halfway through and MAYBE I'll finish it in the next year. Dust I'll log into every day. To each his own. Honestly, if CCP were to keep this game in beta, I wouldn't be complaining at all. I'm just judging it as a released game, that's all. Simply, it just isn't finished. I still enjoy it at times, despite it all. I hit my cap every week in hopes that this game will get on its feet, eventually.