|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
638
   |
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
638
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV? Guess not. Dropships are so beast 
Assault is the only one requiring REAL work, AV just needs a nerf. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
639
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. Feedback is a major part of releasing the numbers. You are complaining because people are giving feedback?
Most of their feedback is bad becuase, again, they aren't considering the future AV changes that CCP is making. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
639
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 21:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:I don't like how these changes is a step back in terms of diversity (ie no different turrets/vehicles)
I think they need to fix some typos (Like blaster damage)
Other than that I can't effiectively say these changes are for the worse. CCP warned you that base vehicle hulls would be weak. but you can not deny that the PG/CPU buffs are pretty rad although I see that Small blaster PG was bumped up into the 200's.....
But it's like this every patch. Oh No! My Callogi can't run 3 Proto Hives now! Oh No! My Flaylock is being balanced!
I say let the monkeys throw poo because their sight stops at 6 feet.
This is so far my only real concern, it's unfortunate really. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
640
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 22:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. I know you love your forge gun, but honestly, EVERYONE should be underwhelmed by these proposals.
*Double Facepalm* AV nerf... incoming... ok? nerf... incoming...
Vehicles should be fine if balancing gets well done.
WoT doesn't have health regen but you don't see anyone complaining. |
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 22:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. I know you love your forge gun, but honestly, EVERYONE should be underwhelmed by these proposals. *Double Facepalm* AV nerf... incoming... ok? nerf... incoming... Vehicles should be fine if balancing gets well done. when has CCP honestly balanced anything correctly? ask ur self this. now how severely do u believe they will honestly nerf AV if they do at all.
I did say if, I don't expect amazing things but upon they mentioning that they will be tweaking AV, I simply couldn't rule out the possibility of it actually being successful.
Also,
I WANT TO BELIEVE.
|
Alldin Kan
TeamPlayers
EoN.
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 22:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Alldin Kan wrote:Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. I know you love your forge gun, but honestly, EVERYONE should be underwhelmed by these proposals. *Double Facepalm* AV nerf... incoming... ok? nerf... incoming... Vehicles should be fine if balancing gets well done. WoT doesn't have health regen but you don't see anyone complaining. WoT has maps, penetration, ballistics, and all manners of mechanics focused on nothing but tank versus tank. Regen is not the issue at all here, in fact it looks like the passive armor regen is WAY too high. The issue the pieces do not fit together into an improvement on the gameplay, which is the whole point of this "rebalance".
We need to stop replying in separate threads. |
|
|
| |
|