DUST Search - Confirmed no vehical re-balance in 1.6

Exmaple Core wrote:

Aeon Amadi wrote:

CCP Logibro wrote:

Absolute Idiom II wrote:

CCP Logibro wrote:

We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night)

Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6?

No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes.

Think it might be time for CCP to hire Bioware's Public Relations guy.

So in 1.2 they released the information of 1.5 being a vehicle re-balance patch. Said woops my bad, it got to be 1.6. Now that 1.5 is right around the corner CCP said just kidding! its gotta wait for 1.7. Now their ploting who to hire to tell us its going to be back in 1.8.

So a broken promise (1.5) for a broken promise (1.6) and soon a broken promise of that promise (1.7). Hey CCP. November

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1438	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:49:00 - [1] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Think it might be time for CCP to hire Bioware's Public Relations guy. So in 1.2 they released the information of 1.5 being a vehicle re-balance patch. Said woops my bad, it got to be 1.6. Now that 1.5 is right around the corner CCP said just kidding! its gotta wait for 1.7. Now their ploting who to hire to tell us its going to be back in 1.8. So a broken promise (1.5) for a broken promise (1.6) and soon a broken promise of that promise (1.7). Hey CCP. November
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 6574	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:50:00 - [2] - Quote You've been here how long? This is standard procedure. Thankfully tossing a few bones to vehicle users will be great competition for the PS4 a week later
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 373	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:51:00 - [3] - Quote Hide yo kids a rage-nado is about to hit the dust forums.
Clips A'hoy The Generals EoN. 30	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:51:00 - [4] - Quote And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it.
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1438	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:51:00 - [5] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: You've been here how long? This is standard procedure. yep. Ive stoped being surprised
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1438	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:53:00 - [6] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Hide yo kids a rage-nado is about to hit the dust forums. nope not from me. Jus throwin it out there, this is what we got. So come up for some ideas for i.6 cuz its not vehical related. Like it should have been
Awesome Pantaloons Tech Guard 89	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:53:00 - [7] - Quote ... You guys need to either get your **** together or stop raising our hopes only to have them crushed. -_- We want news, but we want news of what we are actually going to get in each update. Your slogan should be "CCP: Breaking all of your hopes and dreams to bits since May 2013."
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 373	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:54:00 - [8] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Hide yo kids a rage-nado is about to hit the dust forums. Awesome Pantaloons wrote: ... You guys need to either get your **** together or stop raising our hopes only to have them crushed. -_- We want news, but we want news of what we are actually going to get in each update. Your slogan should be "CCP: Breaking all of your hopes and dreams to bits since May 2013." Called it, I'm a Damn good weather man
Ghost Kaisar Pradox One 392	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:55:00 - [9] - Quote Exmaple Core wrote: So a broken promise (1.5) for a broken promise (1.6) and soon a broken promise of that promise (1.7). Hey CCP. November Working as intended.
Awesome Pantaloons Tech Guard 89	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:55:00 - [10] - Quote Clips A'hoy wrote: And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it. don't kid yourself. Something would still be wrong with it if they spent a year on it. XD

Heathen Bastard The Bastard Brigade 648	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:58:00 - [11] - Quote Heathen Bastard wrote: Heathen Bastard wrote: nope. they've been dead silent except telling us that it was planned for 1.4, then moved to 1.5, and I'm pretty sure that when that gets close, they'll push it to 1.6, then 7, then 2.0, then they'll just announce that they're flat out lying to us and vehicles are actually getting nerfed deeper into the ground. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1183027#post1183027 Called it, over a month ago. How does anyone maintain faith in CCP at this point? Now if only the lotto numbers were so predictable.
Clips A'hoy The Generals EoN. 31	Posted - 2013.10.01 16:59:00 - [12] - Quote Awesome Pantaloons wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it. don't kid yourself. Something would still be wrong with it if they spent a year on it. XD That's true. However it'll still be a ton better than spending a month on it. --Edit-- Keep in mind that there has to be a balance between vehicles and infantry. A tank shouldn't be able to go 50/0 and infantry shouldn't be too strong either.
ugg reset Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 388	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:03:00 - [13] - Quote you can tell me with a straight face that you want content that isn't ready after what we went through when 1.4 came out? chill out and enjoy the ride. EVE wasn't built in a day...
martinofski Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 324	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:07:00 - [14] - Quote November update will be mustacheS!
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1439	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:13:00 - [15] - Quote ugg reset wrote: you can tell me with a straight face that you want content that isn't ready after what we went through when 1.4 came out? chill out and enjoy the ride. EVE wasn't built in a day... i can tell you with a: martinofski wrote: November update will be mustacheS! on my face that vehical users are NOT enjoying the ride for the past 6 months of uprising. Weve been getting annihilated while AV gets buffed and repeatedly told that our vehicals our getting fixed next patch. How can you say wait for something were never going to get? Were not getting vehical fixes. Ever. Because the vehical fixes will be after november and most likely Christmas. Whos going to be here to wait another few months after Christmas to see the vehical patch? Cuz im sure it will be a great one
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1568	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:18:00 - [16] - Quote and your surprised by this?
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1992	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:18:00 - [17] - Quote im gonna go sacrifice some more lambs
Forlorn Destrier Bullet Cluster 1860	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:18:00 - [18] - Quote deleted
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1440	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:19:00 - [19] - Quote Lurchasaurus wrote: im gonna go sacrifice some more lambs sorry gonna have to push your lambs back
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1440	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:21:00 - [20] - Quote Exmaple Core wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Absolute Idiom II wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: We are looking at putting some stuff into 1.6 to alleviate some pressure points ahead of the general vehicle rebalance, but I don't have specifics (but I think I might have heard something about dropships in between howls in the night) Do you mean 1.5 since vehicles is currently slated for 1.6? No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for the weapon changes. Think it might be time for CCP to hire Bioware's Public Relations guy. So in 1.2 they released the information of 1.5 being a vehicle re-balance patch. Said woops my bad, it got to be 1.6. Now that 1.5 is right around the corner CCP said just kidding! its gotta wait for 1.7. Now their ploting who to hire to tell us its going to be back in 1.8. So a broken promise (1.5) for a broken promise (1.6) and soon a broken promise of that promise (1.7). Hey CCP. November I never saw them actually say "we promise x,y,x". Instead, I saw that they were aiming to have things changed in x,y,or z. Well, seems that they weren't able to do what they were trying to do. How many times have you tried to do something but fell short of the goal. I like you exmaple, but please don't propegate anger. It doesn't suit your personality.[/quote] Ty sir :) but i make no promises

Forlorn Destrier Bullet Cluster 1860	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:24:00 - [21] - Quote I deleted my post. I realized I was doing what I accused you of. My bad.
Egypt Musk A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 18	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:25:00 - [22] - Quote Buy our Omega boosters at inflated prices and will make sure they make it into 1.7 ... most likely /S
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1440	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:27:00 - [23] - Quote Forlorn Destrier wrote: I deleted my post. I realized I was doing what I accused you of. My bad. np bro. no offence taken <3
Skihids Bullet Cluster 2204	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:31:00 - [24] - Quote I'd still like a dev blog about the proposed design work and the issues that cropped up that are causing the delay. Some information about the challenges would go a long way to defusing the coming hate. If we are realistically looking at next year it would be a nice gesture to offer a respec of vehicle skills so the dedicated pilots can have some fun in the meantime. I took the last available respec to get out of dropships and it has saved my sanity and my wallet.
Spkr4theDead International-Fleet 936	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:34:00 - [25] - Quote Clips A'hoy wrote: Awesome Pantaloons wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it. don't kid yourself. Something would still be wrong with it if they spent a year on it. XD That's true. However it'll still be a ton better than spending a month on it. --Edit-- Keep in mind that there has to be a balance between vehicles and infantry. A tank shouldn't be able to go 50/0 and infantry shouldn't be too strong either. But why should tanks be balanced such that if the enemy IN A MEANINGLESS PUB MATCH has no better than STD AV, the tank should still be weak to the one or 2 people that bother to take it out? If there's another tank or Logi LAV supporting it, it should not go down at all, and not even have to run away from the fight to rep, because it would be getting remote reps from other vehicles.
Exmaple Core Ancient Exiles 1442	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:36:00 - [26] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: Awesome Pantaloons wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it. don't kid yourself. Something would still be wrong with it if they spent a year on it. XD That's true. However it'll still be a ton better than spending a month on it. --Edit-- Keep in mind that there has to be a balance between vehicles and infantry. A tank shouldn't be able to go 50/0 and infantry shouldn't be too strong either. But why should tanks be balanced such that if the enemy IN A MEANINGLESS PUB MATCH has no better than STD AV, the tank should still be weak to the one or 2 people that bother to take it out? If there's another tank or Logi LAV supporting it, it should not go down at all, and not even have to run away from the fight to rep, because it would be getting remote reps from other vehicles. its whatever, just give up bro. We wont be here by the end of christmas anyway
Spkr4theDead International-Fleet 936	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:37:00 - [27] - Quote Skihids wrote: I'd still like a dev blog about the proposed design work and the issues that cropped up that are causing the delay. Some information about the challenges would go a long way to defusing the coming hate. If we are realistically looking at next year it would be a nice gesture to offer a respec of vehicle skills so the dedicated pilots can have some fun in the meantime. I took the last available respec to get out of dropships and it has saved my sanity and my wallet. This x 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 They can't even throw us this bone.
Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1568	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:39:00 - [28] - Quote Exmaple Core wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: Awesome Pantaloons wrote: Clips A'hoy wrote: And...? I rather have CCP getting it done right the first time than having to put fixes continuously throughout the updates. Deal with it. don't kid yourself. Something would still be wrong with it if they spent a year on it. XD That's true. However it'll still be a ton better than spending a month on it. --Edit-- Keep in mind that there has to be a balance between vehicles and infantry. A tank shouldn't be able to go 50/0 and infantry shouldn't be too strong either. But why should tanks be balanced such that if the enemy IN A MEANINGLESS PUB MATCH has no better than STD AV, the tank should still be weak to the one or 2 people that bother to take it out? If there's another tank or Logi LAV supporting it, it should not go down at all, and not even have to run away from the fight to rep, because it would be getting remote reps from other vehicles. its whatever, just give up bro. We wont be here by the end of christmas anyway you call of duty and bf fansbois wont be here, but true dusties will be, then real balance will arrive.
Buttercup Chipmint Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 37	Posted - 2013.10.01 17:48:00 - [29] - Quote Void Echo wrote: you call of duty and bf fansbois wont be here, but true dusties will be, then real balance will arrive. You know you are right. Any kid straight out of collage should be able to balance this 1000 player base F2P Lobby FPS.
M McManus Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 111	Posted - 2013.10.01 18:06:00 - [30] - Quote CCP releases vehicle balances 3 month later, calls it a winter expansion.. Realises nobody's mad because the only people left playing are 500 fanbois and 500 clueless amoebas, only playing because it was free... (and that number is being generous)



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page