DUST Search - PlansTM and an FW devblog?

All Channels

General Discussions

PlansTM and an FW devblog?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3465	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:50:00 - [1] - Quote Speaking with SoxFour: [00:30] [CCP]FoxFour: We have amazingly large plans for FW [00:30] [CCP]FoxFour: Hopefully will share plans/ideas later this week [00:30] [CCP]FoxFour: next week [00:31] Arkena: Btw Soxfour, being able to run FW 24/7 makes me amazingly happy [00:32] [CCP]FoxFour : We just need to make sure everyone at the company who needs to know and sign off does before we go saying what we want to do [00:32] [CCP]FoxFour: Yea... so as a bit of a hint.... you probably won't be able to after our changes... at least not without an ISK income from somewhere For those interested. :D
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 1806	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:52:00 - [2] - Quote RAMPANT SPECULATION TIME

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 2261	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:52:00 - [3] - Quote And before you ask, no I won't tell you. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3465	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:54:00 - [4] - Quote Nguruthos IX wrote: RAMPANT SPECULATION TIME I bet I'll get a devpost denying everything. EDIT: Wtf Logibro so fast
Aero Yassavi PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 2251	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:55:00 - [5] - Quote Ugh, not being able to run FW 24/7 without an ISK income from elsewhere? If FW isn't going to be profitable then why bother? Hopefully part of the changes includes letting us have a say on where we attack, and a way to hold a district for a meaningful amount of time.
Draxus Prime BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 1481	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:55:00 - [6] - Quote lol this was fast arkena

CCP FoxFour C C P C C P Alliance 132862	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:55:00 - [7] - Quote No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? Game Designer // Team True Grit http://twitter.com/regnerba

Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3465	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:55:00 - [8] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Ugh, not being able to run FW 24/7 without an ISK income from elsewhere? If FW isn't going to be profitable then why bother? Hopefully part of the changes includes letting us have a say on where we attack, and a way to hold a district for a meaningful amount of time. Agreed with everything.
Markus DEI TotaI Depravity 0	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:55:00 - [9] - Quote As long as the Minmatar Suffer I will be happy
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3465	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:57:00 - [10] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? Why would you do that to me Soxfour? Thanks for the clarification. I suppose.


CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 2262	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:59:00 - [11] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? Only if they're unsubstantiated rumours But seriously guys. Patience. You'll hear from CCP Foxfour and the rest of Team True Grit soon enough. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Denidil Taureran Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 48	Posted - 2013.09.25 23:59:00 - [12] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Ugh, not being able to run FW 24/7 without an ISK income from elsewhere? If FW isn't going to be profitable then why bother? Hopefully part of the changes includes letting us have a say on where we attack, and a way to hold a district for a meaningful amount of time. Agreed with everything. Third FW game mode should have standings requirements, etc for the best missions.. and it should have superior rewards to public contracts. we should be encouraged to play hard, use good gear, etc for FW game modes. That means better rewards.
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3468	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:00:00 - [13] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? Only if they're unsubstantiated rumours But seriously guys. Patience. You'll hear from CCP Foxfour and the rest of Team True Grit soon enough. Patience does not exist, there is only SoonTM.
Master Jaraiya Ultramarine Corp 919	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:00:00 - [14] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Speaking with SoxFour: [00:31] Arkena: Btw Soxfour, being able to run FW 24/7 makes me amazingly happy [00:32] [CCP]FoxFour: Yea... so as a bit of a hint.... you probably won't be able to after our changes... at least not without an ISK income from somewhere So, I'm reading this as possible the addition of some exclusivity element to FW. Buy ins? Surely not! Maybe a district ownership prerequisite? Nah, too game breakingly exclusive. Hmmmm.....what could this allude to? Less ISK, payout + Faction Gear Rewards? I kinda like the sound of this!
Draxus Prime BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 1482	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:01:00 - [15] - Quote at least u didn't say patchnotes in 5 mins lol
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 3468	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:02:00 - [16] - Quote Draxus Prime wrote: at least u didn't say patchnotes in 5 mins lol [00:52] [CCP]Forgery: PVE is coming out tomorrow
Draxus Prime BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 1482	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:04:00 - [17] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: at least u didn't say patchnotes in 5 mins lol [00:52] [CCP]Forgery: PVE is coming out tomorrow hahaha
Llast 326 An Arkhos 140	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:06:00 - [18] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? Only if they're unsubstantiated rumours But seriously guys. Patience. You'll hear from CCP Foxfour and the rest of Team True Grit soon enough. The question now becomes; How much will the Fox in Socks pay for me to add an unsubstantiated rumour to this thread?
Master Jaraiya Ultramarine Corp 921	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:12:00 - [19] - Quote [Un?]substantiated rumor!
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 892	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:26:00 - [20] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? I'll go with Damage control. After all Logibro already confirmed all the rumors! I'm pretty interested what we will see. Having to pay collateral before going in matches maybe?

Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. 790	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:30:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: And before you ask, no I won't tell you. O Realy?? Those FW Special Contracts had better include very good salvage.
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 1282	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:34:00 - [22] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? lies and rumors, leavened with conjecture...
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 1810	Posted - 2013.09.26 00:41:00 - [23] - Quote Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: And before you ask, no I won't tell you. O Realy?? Those FW Special Contracts had better include very good salvage. Salvage isn't that useful though, till you can trade with players at least.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. 791	Posted - 2013.09.26 01:05:00 - [24] - Quote Nguruthos IX wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: And before you ask, no I won't tell you. O Realy?? Those FW Special Contracts had better include very good salvage. Salvage isn't that useful though, till you can trade with players at least. With a thousand Balacs I can do player tradeing..................they die and I LOL.
itsmellslikefish DIOS EX. Top Men. 264	Posted - 2013.09.26 01:10:00 - [25] - Quote Markus DEI wrote: As long as the Minmatar Suffer I will be happy Dam dude...
Skipper Jones Militaires-Sans-Frontieres 805	Posted - 2013.09.26 01:31:00 - [26] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: And before you ask, no I won't tell you. C'mon Logibro. We have that Gallente brotherhood going on. Just tell us Gallentes. Those Caldari have no business knowing.
Blooticus DUST University Ivy League 27	Posted - 2013.09.26 02:04:00 - [27] - Quote Maybe they mean an ISK source from somewhere else. (Looks longingly up to the stars). Give us some Space Rich Sugar Daddies.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 2294	Posted - 2013.09.26 02:08:00 - [28] - Quote Denidil Taureran wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Ugh, not being able to run FW 24/7 without an ISK income from elsewhere? If FW isn't going to be profitable then why bother? Hopefully part of the changes includes letting us have a say on where we attack, and a way to hold a district for a meaningful amount of time. Agreed with everything. Third FW game mode should have standings requirements, etc for the best missions.. and it should have superior rewards to public contracts. we should be encouraged to play hard, use good gear, etc for FW game modes. That means better rewards. I also feel like this should be a must have. FW requires an alternate ISK source to engage in? Where shall we go to get that ISK source, if we would rather fight in FW than in Public Contracts, or be unable to enter the PC stage? I would also like to see real benefits for FW actions. Taking and holding districts for periods of time. Dust affecting the over war. Real rewards for Loyalty. .....and maybe someone could slip a mix tape repeating the words "Amarr HAV" over CCP Wolfman's head while he is napping after a long day of Weapon Design....? Who knows?
Godin Thekiller Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 906	Posted - 2013.09.26 02:17:00 - [29] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: No, no no. No FW dev blog. Think more forum discussion, not dev blog. I look at things more like this: We think of ideas, throw them around internally and with people on IRC, forums, the CSM, that kind of stuff. Then forum threads are for discussing things. Then after all feedback dev blogs for confirming things, hopefully with time left for iterating based on dev blog feedback. Also, I ramble a lot on IRC. 90% of it is lies. So yea... I wouldn't take much from this... Or maybe I am just trying damage control now... WHO KNOWS! Can't we lock threads for rumors or something? forum discussions are way better than dev blogs, because usually you guys respond. Which reminds me; Wolfman said he was going to do one for an update on what his team's got so far on vehicles and AV. Can you ask him when he will do that? And no, you got reset on your forum powers from forum banning II to N.
Kristoff Atruin Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1106	Posted - 2013.09.26 03:40:00 - [30] - Quote In Eve sometimes when you run missions the agent will require you to pay a deposit that gets returned when you finish the mission successfully. My guess is that they're implementing the same kind of thing for FW. If you take a FW contract and lose the battle, then you lose your deposit. Sort of like how corp contracts used to work back in the day. You can probably run them all day as long as you win most of the time. And...maybe that's the loyalty component. The more you run for a given faction, the less the deposit is?



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.