|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3472
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 20:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Spoilt, the laws of physics have been broken to allow you to survive a vehicle hitting you at high speed, in favour of them either completely phasing straight through you or making you slide along the ground, in complete defiance of Newtonian physics, and you're still complaining about being roadkilled?
I think i just lost all hope in blueberries. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3476
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 20:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:gbghg wrote:Spoilt, the laws of physics have been broken to allow you to survive a vehicle hitting you at high speed, in favour of them either completely phasing straight through you or making you slide along the ground, in complete defiance of Newtonian physics, and you're still complaining about being roadkilled?
I think i just lost all hope in blueberries. That's great bud why don't you come back when you realize this is a video game whys don't you come back when you've got over that ridiculous attitude that a moving vehicle should impart no damage to you? battlefield has it, halo has it, a bunch of games has it because it makes sense and provides another way to kill someone, but due to the lav health buff making LAV's no longer insta-pop to AV nades like back in chrome a rather fun way of killing people has been removed.
seriously roadkilling provided variety and allowed vehicle users a cheap but effective alternative to running their main vehicles. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3478
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 21:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:gbghg wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:gbghg wrote:Spoilt, the laws of physics have been broken to allow you to survive a vehicle hitting you at high speed, in favour of them either completely phasing straight through you or making you slide along the ground, in complete defiance of Newtonian physics, and you're still complaining about being roadkilled?
I think i just lost all hope in blueberries. That's great bud why don't you come back when you realize this is a video game whys don't you come back when you've got over that ridiculous attitude that a moving vehicle should impart no damage to you? battlefield has it, halo has it, a bunch of games has it because it makes sense and provides another way to kill someone, but due to the lav health buff making LAV's no longer insta-pop to AV nades like back in chrome a rather fun way of killing people has been removed. seriously roadkilling provided variety and allowed vehicle users a cheap but effective alternative to running their main vehicles. Did I say it should cause no dmg new berry? You should check back into grade school and get that reading comprehension to lvl 5 i was simply inferring from what you posted that that is what you would eventually end up at, and seriously newberry? that's nowhere near accurate. perhaps you should get look at post history to lv1? it would save you embarrassment. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3478
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 21:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:gbghg wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:gbghg wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:
That's great bud why don't you come back when you realize this is a video game
whys don't you come back when you've got over that ridiculous attitude that a moving vehicle should impart no damage to you? battlefield has it, halo has it, a bunch of games has it because it makes sense and provides another way to kill someone, but due to the lav health buff making LAV's no longer insta-pop to AV nades like back in chrome a rather fun way of killing people has been removed. seriously roadkilling provided variety and allowed vehicle users a cheap but effective alternative to running their main vehicles. Did I say it should cause no dmg new berry? You should check back into grade school and get that reading comprehension to lvl 5 i was simply inferring from what you posted that that is what you would eventually end up at, and seriously newberry? that's nowhere near accurate. perhaps you should get look at post history to lv1? it would save you embarrassment. I'm sure if I looked at the post history, I wouldn't be the one embarrassed. in your case post history isn't even required. |
|
|
|