|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
990
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thank you! I was beginning to worry that the community won't fill the weekly quota of repeated threads.
Seriously, I'm appalled at that "receive good press". Only young immature gamers are so infused with what the press thinks about a game. Who gives a flux?
I'm having a good time...this isn't Final Fantasy. This isn't your average game with an average run of the mill developer.
It's clear that if you were so good at these ideas that you would somehow be involved within the gaming industry. Since you're not, please be quiet. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
991
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Passive aggressiveness doesn't really work here. It's always one of you guys that talk nonsense. It's always the doom and gloom.
It's like a checklist because it seems you naysayers can't really come up with much negative besides what you folks repeat day in and day out. I've been reading about Dust is dying on this forums for months. I've also read about guys who claimed to be leaving and they stay.
It's boring. You're not creative enough to come up with a new and fresh argument so you recycle the old. Instead of rallying behind the developer to better your experience, you simply say idiotic things for some sort of reaction.
But this is what the industry deals with. Moronic ideas uttered by followers who couldn't stand on their own opinion if their life depends on it. They just rehash whats been said by something other gamer.
For instance, "CCP has struggled immensely in making good use of the PS3 limited capabilites"
That is one stupid remark. Its well known that while the PS3's tech is good, it is quite difficult to be developed on. The sheer size of the maps and details shows you that CCP have gotten better with the development. From sun rays, to lighting effects, to shading, to landscape, and to building design-Dust is continuing to look better than its previous builds.
|
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
991
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
2-Ton Twenty-One wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Thank you! I was beginning to worry that the community won't fill the weekly quota of repeated threads.
Seriously, I'm appalled at that "receive good press". Only young immature gamers are so infused with what the press thinks about a game. Who gives a flux?
I'm having a good time...this isn't Final Fantasy. This isn't your average game with an average run of the mill developer.
It's clear that if you were so good at these ideas that you would somehow be involved within the gaming industry. Since you're not, please be quiet. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. Fanboi in 4 posts...
This brainchild. It was one post, Einstein. I am supporter of CCP, yes. I don't care how you view it. If you're not here to support the game then take your whiny selves back to the cheerleader squads you good at. This game is for folks who actually like to hit hard on the field. Pansies need not apply. So pull down your skirts and hopefully you might grow a pair. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
995
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
If the player base is gone then how is this game still being played? Ghosts?
But ok.
I'm having a great time with Dust. And I look forward to the future of Dust.
The truth is, I'm not the only one that feels this way.
I will continue supporting this project because I love their ambition and the idea of it all
It's damn good fun...sorry you don't have the same experience. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
995
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:And what? Ps4 coming and all games must vo from ps3 version to ps4? I dont think that ALL will buy ps4 at start.
No they don't. Smart people don't buy first gen tech. And the transitional period is at least a year. Plus the tech has to be realized fully. So that means next gen won't be all next gen until the following year.
Go figure. |
|
|
|