DUST Search - 1.6 is it time for PvE? are we ready?

All Channels

General Discussions

1.6 is it time for PvE? are we ready?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 55	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:02:00 - [1] - Quote It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3640	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:04:00 - [2] - Quote DUST needed PVE a long time ago. Sadly like most content it's taken a backseat for Uprising improvements. I honestly won't expect PVE till next year.
Chris F2112 High-Damage 420	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:05:00 - [3] - Quote CCP is already working on PVP, but they definitely should focus first and foremost on the PvP part of the game. If I was to hazard a guess I think it'll be a big enough update to merit the 2.0 branding. Solid PvE is one of the hardest things to do right in a game. Simply throwing waves of enemies at the player isn't a good game. Making it fun and dynamic involves complex AI systems and a ton of work.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 6097	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:05:00 - [4] - Quote Dust needs drones that you control COOLEST **** EVER
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 5756	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:07:00 - [5] - Quote Don't count on it. There is always some new priority getting in the way of anything truly exciting.
Logi Bro Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN. 2185	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:08:00 - [6] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE 1. Something new to do 2. Seriously, tired of shooting the same people over and over again, give me something new to do. -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE 1. Player retention 2. Increases replay value -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha They need to release PvE when Uprising hits. Oh, wait, that already happened and they didn't release it. So it should be in 1.1, no wait, 1.2, actually 1.3....hold on, 1.4. Now that I think about it, it better ****ing be in 1.5.
The Robot Devil Echo Galactic Industries 907	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:09:00 - [7] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: DUST needed PVE a long time ago. Sadly like most content it's taken a backseat for Uprising improvements. I honestly won't expect PVE till next year. Damn the truth hurts.
Hellkeizer The Avutora Complex 43	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:09:00 - [8] - Quote If they added it I bet alot of these "problems" would never have been as big as they are now/were. I mostly mean AFKing and matchmaking problems but, some other things as well.
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 55	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:12:00 - [9] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: Nick nugg3t wrote: -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE 1. Something new to do 2. Seriously, tired of shooting the same people over and over again, give me something new to do. -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE 1. Player retention 2. Increases replay value -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha They need to release PvE when Uprising hits. Oh, wait, that already happened and they didn't release it. So it should be in 1.1, no wait, 1.2, actually 1.3....hold on, 1.4. Now that I think about it, it better ****ing be in 1.5. thanks for your comment. this is the kind of comment i was hoping for. I think 1.6 they should release it. simply 1.freaking6
Hellkeizer The Avutora Complex 43	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:18:00 - [10] - Quote Chris F2112 wrote: CCP is already working on PVP, but they definitely should focus first and foremost on the PvP part of the game. If I was to hazard a guess I think it'll be a big enough update to merit the 2.0 branding. Solid PvE is one of the hardest things to do right in a game. Simply throwing waves of enemies at the player isn't a good game. Making it fun and dynamic involves complex AI systems and a ton of work. World at War Zombies was like this(the 1st map) and many people liked it. I have a feeling though that, with how serious this community is, PvE won't be as fun as everyone thinks it will be. Especially when CCP messes up the smallest little detail

velos ALKARI DUST University Ivy League 27	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:21:00 - [11] - Quote Hellkeizer wrote: If they added it I bet alot of these "problems" would never have been as big as they are now/were. I mostly mean AFKing and matchmaking problems but, some other things as well. people would have had another game variant to take part in , rather than having to deal with their patch hates for every possible variation of DUST as is.so yeah , problems wouldn't even have blown up by the userbase the way they have if there was something to take you attention partially from it.
ZDub 303 TeamPlayers EoN. 2008	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:22:00 - [12] - Quote 1.6? No I expect 1.6 will contain infantry balance changes similar to what 1.5 will do for vehicles. I get the impression that they are trying to balance the current game first, before adding new content. They have learned their lesson with the Flaylock Pistol I think. Post 1.6 and Pre 2.0 should hopefully see the addition of the missing racial variants, dropsuits, guns, vehicles, etc. Then maybe 2.0 will be out next year with PvE.
Rynoceros Rise of Old Dudes 649	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:25:00 - [13] - Quote The new maps look very PvE friendly. Or, maybe even a third team.....? Lots of room for murder and profit. More.
Hellkeizer The Avutora Complex 43	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:29:00 - [14] - Quote ZDub 303 wrote: 1.6? No I expect 1.6 will contain infantry balance changes similar to what 1.5 will do for vehicles. I get the impression that they are trying to balance the current game first, before adding new content. They have learned their lesson with the Flaylock Pistol I think. Post 1.6 and Pre 2.0 should hopefully see the addition of the missing racial variants, dropsuits, guns, vehicles, etc. Then maybe 2.0 will be out next year with PvE. Balancing a game before new stuff is added is a facepalm waiting to happen and lots of drama
velos ALKARI DUST University Ivy League 30	Posted - 2013.09.05 04:38:00 - [15] - Quote Hellkeizer wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: 1.6? No I expect 1.6 will contain infantry balance changes similar to what 1.5 will do for vehicles. I get the impression that they are trying to balance the current game first, before adding new content. They have learned their lesson with the Flaylock Pistol I think. Post 1.6 and Pre 2.0 should hopefully see the addition of the missing racial variants, dropsuits, guns, vehicles, etc. Then maybe 2.0 will be out next year with PvE. Balancing a game before new stuff is added is a facepalm waiting to happen and lots of drama CO-rect
Slender Night Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 0	Posted - 2013.09.06 06:06:00 - [16] - Quote when i first seen a trailer for dust i saw mercs fighting drones. i love this as im a pve'r in eve. so i went out n bought a ps3 and gotdust. then looked for 3 days how to play pve. tbh this was a bit of false advertising and i was sorely disapointed but i understand there are other things that are more pressing. i just felt disapointed they would advertise something in the trailer that they didnt have. i hope they bring it out soon but then afain i hope for lots of things in dust. like an induatry path even if it is corp based. maybe a way to practice with your mates on your districts, pve, same number of suits and vehicals for all races. but theres tons to do and manpower only goes so far so fast. but please work on this.
Michael Arck Anubis Prime Syndicate 886	Posted - 2013.09.06 06:08:00 - [17] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Dust needs drones that you control COOLEST **** EVER CCP revealed some concept art where there would be these pods that would release drones that mercs could control. When and if that's happening for sure, I don't know. But I remember Brendan talking about it at FanFest, if I'm not mistaken.
Michael Arck Anubis Prime Syndicate 894	Posted - 2013.09.06 06:40:00 - [18] - Quote Player Controlled Drones
Eingrasse Hemstoy Very Dangerous F'kn People 13	Posted - 2013.09.06 07:05:00 - [19] - Quote Realistically PvE can really set this game apart, especially if it's still team, or squad based. It can give some older players a break, and bring in newer players. I would hope ccp is at least thinking about some pve ideas that are just as bold as dust514 However, they should definitely keep focusing their efforts into making the game balanced, fun, and in working order. At least that's what I think. As far as when? I'd say as soon as theyre ready. Happy hunting
nakaya indigene 0uter.Heaven 67	Posted - 2013.09.06 07:20:00 - [20] - Quote we need to get a petition rolling to get ccp to focus on pve. this game has too many flaws with pvp and too many people squabbling at each other. if we had something that ccp built to distract us while they fixed the game, it might be more enjoyable. we need something that's fun and achievement based.

Lady MDK Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire 26	Posted - 2013.09.06 07:33:00 - [21] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Player Controlled Drones Hopefully those two PVE modes he mentions in the video aren't the only ones they are working on.... They sound so generic. EVE offers much more scope for PVE than that and should use the EVE/DUST link to make DUST more visible. I'm talking MERC involvement in Incursions and Station Raids where eve pilots see the site spawn in eve as an anomaly to be scanned down - Maybe this could also provide those in eve with something to do (made have the dust mission made a bit easier with capsulier support i.e. the eve pilots have to destroy a shield generator and that means that the dust guys don't have to hack several points to access the endgame of the mission). There is lots that could be done.... go and shoot drones is hopefully just the foot in the door of PVE.
Sarducar Kahn xCosmic Voidx The Superpowers 96	Posted - 2013.09.06 07:36:00 - [22] - Quote In 1.5 they are striping vehicles back to barebones vehicles and mods. In 1.6 they are fleshing it back out again.
Yan Darn DUST University Ivy League 117	Posted - 2013.09.06 07:52:00 - [23] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE 1) content variety. Including mission types that reward players who invested in something other than infantry/assault. 2) the unique potential for PVE to turn to PVP -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE 1) if implemented right, PVE could be a link between DUST/EVE - whether it's killing drones for salvage, scanning/hacking missions for item blueprints or WH locations or the like, mineral heists/escort missions etc. 2) NPE much easier to craft with a PVE element in the game. -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha Probably after 1.6 :( It makes sense to get racial content out first and that would be December earlier I'm guessing....
ZDub 303 TeamPlayers EoN. 2036	Posted - 2013.09.06 14:21:00 - [24] - Quote Hellkeizer wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: 1.6? No I expect 1.6 will contain infantry balance changes similar to what 1.5 will do for vehicles. I get the impression that they are trying to balance the current game first, before adding new content. They have learned their lesson with the Flaylock Pistol I think. Post 1.6 and Pre 2.0 should hopefully see the addition of the missing racial variants, dropsuits, guns, vehicles, etc. Then maybe 2.0 will be out next year with PvE. Balancing a game before new stuff is added is a facepalm waiting to happen and lots of drama No i think they have the right idea. Fixing core mechanics and balancing this like rifles vs explosives is good to do before adding in more rifles and explosives. Looks at how fast the meta is changing with aiming fixed? Maybe the MD didnt need the nerfs 40% of the forum was crying out for? Or how about fixing tanks before adding in more AV? I think that's probably a good idea. It takes a long time and it sucks but I'm glad they are figuring out their current lineup now instead of adding a bunch of stuff to an already imbalanced and problematic game and then having to rebalance everything. They can design weapons with how it fits the current meta they are trying to build.
Travi Zyg G I A N T EoN. 101	Posted - 2013.09.06 14:25:00 - [25] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha 200% backing this post!
Jayquan18 The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 108	Posted - 2013.09.06 14:56:00 - [26] - Quote I think it's time for 48 players.
LT Dans Legs Bullet Cluster 215	Posted - 2013.09.06 15:01:00 - [27] - Quote Hey wait, I dont want PVE. Thats not every single person. Lol
Solomon Malcolm BurgezzE.T.F 44	Posted - 2013.09.06 15:01:00 - [28] - Quote Plus the installations seems to be getting smarter now.....
Vespasian Andendare Subsonic Synthesis Alpha Wolf Pack 359	Posted - 2013.09.06 15:11:00 - [29] - Quote The Robot Devil wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: DUST needed PVE a long time ago. Sadly like most content it's taken a backseat for Uprising improvements. I honestly won't expect PVE till next year. Damn the truth hurts. Yeah, but would we rather a solid pvp experience and wait (most likely until Fanfest 2014) for a good pve experience, or would you rather them push out pve at the expense of the core shooter mechanic? That doesn't sound that appealing to me, considering that doing so would effectively "drive" everyone to pve, which, for a multiplayer shooter, doesn't sound that appetizing. I'd much rather have new maps, all weapons, all dropsuits, new equipment, new vehicles, etc. before we get pve. At least at that point, it'd just be a matter of adding drones into already existing maps and content.
Roy Ventus Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 476	Posted - 2013.09.06 15:12:00 - [30] - Quote Chris F2112 wrote: CCP is already working on PVE, but they definitely should focus first and foremost on the PvP part of the game. If I was to hazard a guess I think it'll be a big enough update to merit the 2.0 branding. Solid PvE is one of the hardest things to do right in a game. Simply throwing waves of enemies at the player isn't a good game. Making it fun and dynamic involves complex AI systems and a ton of work. WOAH. WOAH. WOAH. Being reasonable? that's not how you Dust!



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.