DUST Search - 1.6 is it time for PvE? are we ready?

All Channels

General Discussions

1.6 is it time for PvE? are we ready?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tebu Gan CrimeWave Syndicate 76	Posted - 2013.09.06 15:36:00 - [31] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha If you read the dev post about the vehicle balance in 1.5, you would notice that they are also going to be adding more vehicle stuff into 1.6. 1.5 is all about the tank balance (not much word on Dropships yet). 1.6 is supposed to be the final touches on tank balance. They are basically breaking tanks down to the bare necessity's for a month then adding back all the modules they are taking away.
Michael Arck Anubis Prime Syndicate 913	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:04:00 - [32] - Quote Lady MDK wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Player Controlled Drones Hopefully those two PVE modes he mentions in the video aren't the only ones they are working on.... They sound so generic. EVE offers much more scope for PVE than that and should use the EVE/DUST link to make DUST more visible. I'm talking MERC involvement in Incursions and Station Raids where eve pilots see the site spawn in eve as an anomaly to be scanned down - Maybe this could also provide those in eve with something to do (made have the dust mission made a bit easier with capsulier support i.e. the eve pilots have to destroy a shield generator and that means that the dust guys don't have to hack several points to access the endgame of the mission). There is lots that could be done.... go and shoot drones is hopefully just the foot in the door of PVE. Yes I agree, we can only hope that the idea continues to grow. I like your ideas. You should share that with CCP, if they are not already listening. I have no knowledge of EVE. Dust is my introduction to the New Eden universe.
low genius the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance 406	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:05:00 - [33] - Quote not yet. we need a full line of suits and vehicles. once that's accomplished, you carebears can pve it up.
Michael Arck Anubis Prime Syndicate 913	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:08:00 - [34] - Quote low genius wrote: not yet. we need a full line of suits and vehicles. once that's accomplished, you carebears can pve it up. of course, what was I thinking. All the racial variants should be included. Spoken without sarcasm
God Hates Lags Red Star. EoN. 55	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:12:00 - [35] - Quote The next update after 1.5 has to be a content update. If not PVE then racial suits and weapons.
Knight Soiaire Better Hide R Die 2276	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:12:00 - [36] - Quote My body is most definitely ready.
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 64	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:18:00 - [37] - Quote nakaya indigene wrote: we need to get a petition rolling to get ccp to focus on pve. this game has too many flaws with pvp and too many people squabbling at each other. if we had something that ccp built to distract us while they fixed the game, it might be more enjoyable. we need something that's fun and achievement based. If there were to be a petition It would have to be done right and with the right attitude. most petitions on these forums consist of grouping together and yelling at ccp to nerf some weapon and they for the most part just come across as annoying and dont get anything done. If I were to even consider getting a pettition going It would be DEV friendly and inviting as in we all just want some honest feedback and discussion about pve, which we all clearly want.\ It would not to be a trap to capture a DEV and hold him down to his\her knees while EVERY ONE screams at him\her to give them what they want bombarding the DEV with the Petitions OVERWHELMING numbers. the petition would be to show how many people want PvE and all these people would want some honest answers as to the development of PvE . NOTHING ELSE TO IT. . . .just answers i have made my point. thanks for your comment :)
Meknow Intaki Northwind Alliance Dark Taboo 27	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:28:00 - [38] - Quote I look forward to the day I get together a 16 man squad to take on a level 4 mission The update for all the missions will be huge
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 65	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:31:00 - [39] - Quote Yan Darn wrote: Nick nugg3t wrote: -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE 1) content variety. Including mission types that reward players who invested in something other than infantry/assault. 2) the unique potential for PVE to turn to PVP -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE 1) if implemented right, PVE could be a link between DUST/EVE - whether it's killing drones for salvage, scanning/hacking missions for item blueprints or WH locations or the like, mineral heists/escort missions etc. 2) NPE much easier to craft with a PVE element in the game. -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha Probably after 1.6 :( It makes sense to get racial content out first and that would be December earlier I'm guessing.... thank you for the reply man I never thought about mission types before. . . that is a really interesting and cool idea. the first thing that came to my head after reading that was a heavy. he was slowly making his way through a hallway to be attacked head first by drones. he squeezes the trigger of his hmg letting a storm of bullets keep them at bay. drone bombardment is a cool mission type for a heavy player. if a squad of friends are playing the heavy player can provide sufficient fire support as a scout friend bolts through all the drones dodging his way to the objective point (a hacking point or technology that the enemy drones have stolen from you, something cool like that.)
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 65	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:33:00 - [40] - Quote Travi Zyg wrote: Nick nugg3t wrote: It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha 200% backing this post! 300% backing your post about backing my post!! <3 haha

Yan Darn DUST University Ivy League 121	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:37:00 - [41] - Quote low genius wrote: not yet. we need a full line of suits and vehicles. once that's accomplished, you carebears can pve it up. Though remember - if it's anything like EVE PVE, it could actually be opening some more dynamic and interesting PVP - compared to lobby shooter pvp anyway. I wouldn't mind doing a solo stealth mission then have a squad of protos show up to [try] and steal the stuff I've just earned.
Marston VC SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 955	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:43:00 - [42] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha I keep telling you people that were probably not going to get PVE until Christmas at least...... Right now CCP is working on 1.5, then 1.6 will come out, then 1.7, then hopefully they'll just skip to 2.0 and add a boat load of content. I mean, for every month the vehicle teams don't release another vehicle, its not like they didn't do anything for a whole month...... There whole staff is working right now and eventually things will all fall into place! Eventually......
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 66	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:53:00 - [43] - Quote Marston VC wrote: Nick nugg3t wrote: It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha I keep telling you people that were probably not going to get PVE until Christmas at least...... Right now CCP is working on 1.5, then 1.6 will come out, then 1.7, then hopefully they'll just skip to 2.0 and add a boat load of content. I mean, for every month the vehicle teams don't release another vehicle, its not like they didn't do anything for a whole month...... There whole staff is working right now and eventually things will all fall into place! Eventually...... What do you mean by "for every month the vehicle teams dont release another vehicle" ? I didnt get that sorry And It sounds like your impression of this thread is people thinking CCP is lazy and need to get to work . I am happy to say that is not the tone or point of this thread in anyway . I am sure you meant nothing by it but let me explain the purpose behind this thread -honest,insightful, and healthy discussion about the importance of PvE and its potential . - maybe to get a DEV to put his two cents In
Nick nugg3t United Universe Corp 66	Posted - 2013.09.06 16:57:00 - [44] - Quote LT Dans Legs wrote: Hey wait, I dont want PVE. Thats not every single person. Lol why wouldnt you want PvE? How would it negatively effect your dust 514 experience?? I am actually quite curious
Cai Mo Bullet Cluster 5	Posted - 2013.09.06 20:38:00 - [45] - Quote Always looked forward to pve myself too untill I realized the pub-matches are filling the role already atm. Would like to hear a good argument not to play pub-matches as if it is pve, no A.I. will ever be as advanced (/stupid/irrational) as other people. You could bring up that you dont want to fight people, but what's the difference when you have no contact with red-dots, could be npc's for all you know. I'm still not against pve at all in the right (open world) environment, but right now it would not make sense yet to split the pool of 3-4k players, it would prolly just create an easier way to make loads of isk to use on proto-gear in pub-matches imho.
nakaya indigene 0uter.Heaven 70	Posted - 2013.09.07 05:21:00 - [46] - Quote Nick nugg3t wrote: nakaya indigene wrote: we need to get a petition rolling to get ccp to focus on pve. this game has too many flaws with pvp and too many people squabbling at each other. if we had something that ccp built to distract us while they fixed the game, it might be more enjoyable. we need something that's fun and achievement based. If there were to be a petition It would have to be done right and with the right attitude. most petitions on these forums consist of grouping together and yelling at ccp to nerf some weapon and they for the most part just come across as annoying and dont get anything done. If I were to even consider getting a pettition going It would be DEV friendly and inviting as in we all just want some honest feedback and discussion about pve, which we all clearly want.\ It would not to be a trap to capture a DEV and hold him down to his\her knees while EVERY ONE screams at him\her to give them what they want bombarding the DEV with the Petitions OVERWHELMING numbers. the petition would be to show how many people want PvE and all these people would want some honest answers as to the development of PvE . NOTHING ELSE TO IT. . . .just answers i have made my point. thanks for your comment :) I agree, where should we start?


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page