DUST Search - If Dust 514 was made with a different engine....

True Adamance wrote:

Aeon Amadi wrote:

NOTE: Now, I had prepared this long list of different features every engine offers and what makes them unique but I decided to scrap it whenever I hit the CryEngine 3 and it's MASSIVE amount of features. So, sorry guys - research on your own time, I've got **** to do.

Now, the majority of these are known First Person Shooter engines with some exclusions (Halo, Destiny and Killzone use un-named in-house engines, for example) I've also added the Carbon Engine, developed by CCP, as an option. While it is not used for FPS purposes, I am interested to see how many people vote for it.

Which Engine would you want it to be made with?

A.) Frostbite
(Developed by DICE - Used in the Battlefield franchise)

B.) CryEngine
(Developed by Crytek - Used in the Crysis franchise)

C.) Forgelight
(Developed by SOE - Used in Planetside 2)

D.) Source
(Developed by Valve - Used in Half-Life franchise)

E.) IW Engine
(Developed by Infinity Ward - Used in Call of Duty franchise)

F.) Carbon Engine
(Developed by CCP Games - Used in Eve Online)

Take your votes!

CryEngine.

MechWarrior online uses CryEngine and its a fanatastic mech combat game. I would love to see lots of swarming foot soldiers try to combat Tanks, Mechs, etc on CryEngine.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2599	Posted - 2013.08.31 23:44:00 - [1] - Quote NOTE: Now, I had prepared this long list of different features every engine offers and what makes them unique but I decided to scrap it whenever I hit the CryEngine 3 and it's MASSIVE amount of features. So, sorry guys - research on your own time, I've got ** to do. Now, the majority of these are known First Person Shooter engines with some exclusions (Halo, Destiny and Killzone use un-named in-house engines, for example) I've also added the Carbon Engine, developed by CCP, as an option. While it is not used for FPS purposes, I am interested to see how many people vote for it. Which Engine would you want it to be made with?** A.) Frostbite (Developed by DICE - Used in the Battlefield franchise) B.) CryEngine (Developed by Crytek - Used in the Crysis franchise) C.) Forgelight (Developed by SOE - Used in Planetside 2) D.) Source (Developed by Valve - Used in Half-Life franchise) E.) IW Engine (Developed by Infinity Ward - Used in Call of Duty franchise) F.) Carbon Engine (Developed by CCP Games - Used in Eve Online) Take your votes!
Thurak1 Psygod9 107	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:00:00 - [2] - Quote I have see the cry engine in gameplay from MWO a lot. I haven't seen nearly as many issues with it. They even have defense systems where i get hit for partial damage not full damage. I dont think that this engine is even capable of such a thing. Maybe its just me but this game seems to have the worst engine i have seen in a very long time.
Henchmen21 Planet Express LLC 176	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:00:00 - [3] - Quote I have this absurd hope that they are working on a Carbon version for the PS4 and this version is just for getting the numbers right. A man can dream though, a man can dream
N1ck Comeau Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 1219	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:01:00 - [4] - Quote Can any company even use some of those engines do to ownership reasons?
Princeps Marcellus Expert Intervention Caldari State 183	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:03:00 - [5] - Quote F.)Carbon. Secondary: C.) Lighting in that game is absolutely beautiful.
Octavian Vetiver Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 186	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:06:00 - [6] - Quote They originally were going to use Carbon engine when the idea was to put it on PC. Whenever they decided to go with console instead they ran into a problem. The first was the issue with Microsoft so no Xbox. The second was the fact that while Carbon works well for EvE. Trying to shoehorn it onto consoles and FPS was a bit of an issue apparently. Carbon can be resource intensive thus the fact it's being used for CQ. The rest of the ones you listed would require A: Large royalties to the companies who own those engines B: It would require them scrapping the Unreal+Carbon mix they're using now and completely remaking the game from scratch almost.
BAMM HAVOC Carbon 7 CRONOS. 33	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:08:00 - [7] - Quote I have raised this question before... frostbite is my choice
Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 386	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:09:00 - [8] - Quote N1ck Comeau wrote: Can any company even use some of those engines do to ownership reasons? The Carbon Framework is used by CCP to create virtual worlds, and not intended or available for licensing. Source ... http://www.ccpgames.com/en/company/technology Edit also we'd have FAR more interaction with Eve already and WAY faster development process if DUST was developed on Carbon ... since CCP developed it.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 519	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:19:00 - [9] - Quote CryEngine all the way. But if they ever decide to do an open world thing, I think Fox engine will be great. Oh, and btw, everything would be better than this semi-custom UE 3.
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 287	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:19:00 - [10] - Quote i hope this gets on PS4 F.) Carbon Engine (Developed by CCP Games - Used in Eve Online) or NOT Unreal FUKIN Engine UE fukin SUCKS in EVERY game characters are bulky , terrain and corners stucking , low res texture when you begin an area after loading screen , jaggy SPEC OPS the line uses UE , good game but low res textures ALWAYS appear when game starts , looks like a playstation 2 Silent Hill Downpour uses UE , you get stuck in corners and low res in the begining of a area, this low res stuff is in almost all UE games i HATE with a passion UE , it fukin SUCKS i dont know why it gets all praise , must be cheap or easy to work with Batman games use UE , bulky bulk bulk characters

Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 386	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:24:00 - [11] - Quote THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: i dont know why it gets all praise , must be cheap or easy to work with Think I read on here somewhere it's free ! and fairly easy to work with.
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 287	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:25:00 - [12] - Quote Needless Sacermendor wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: i dont know why it gets all praise , must be cheap or easy to work with Think I read on here somewhere it's free ! and fairly easy to work with. lol thats explains a lot if true
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 519	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:25:00 - [13] - Quote Needless Sacermendor wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: i dont know why it gets all praise , must be cheap or easy to work with Think I read on here somewhere it's free ! and fairly easy to work with. wait wait. If you're developing a game for non commercial purposes it's free..otherwise.... it's the same for Unity and CryEngine
Octavian Vetiver Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 186	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:26:00 - [14] - Quote xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: i dont know why it gets all praise , must be cheap or easy to work with Think I read on here somewhere it's free ! and fairly easy to work with. wait wait. If you're developing a game for non commercial purposes it's free..otherwise.... it's the same for Unity and CryEngine It's cheaper then the others all except Unity.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 1470	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:26:00 - [15] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: NOTE: Now, I had prepared this long list of different features every engine offers and what makes them unique but I decided to scrap it whenever I hit the CryEngine 3 and it's MASSIVE amount of features. So, sorry guys - research on your own time, I've got ** to do. Now, the majority of these are known First Person Shooter engines with some exclusions (Halo, Destiny and Killzone use un-named in-house engines, for example) I've also added the Carbon Engine, developed by CCP, as an option. While it is not used for FPS purposes, I am interested to see how many people vote for it. Which Engine would you want it to be made with?** A.) Frostbite (Developed by DICE - Used in the Battlefield franchise) B.) CryEngine (Developed by Crytek - Used in the Crysis franchise) C.) Forgelight (Developed by SOE - Used in Planetside 2) D.) Source (Developed by Valve - Used in Half-Life franchise) E.) IW Engine (Developed by Infinity Ward - Used in Call of Duty franchise) F.) Carbon Engine (Developed by CCP Games - Used in Eve Online) Take your votes! CryEngine. MechWarrior online uses CryEngine and its a fanatastic mech combat game. I would love to see lots of swarming foot soldiers try to combat Tanks, Mechs, etc on CryEngine.
Monkey MAC killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance 53	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:27:00 - [16] - Quote While some of the these engines are indeed nice to haves, could you imagine cryengine 3 !?!? The unreal engine is by far the most practical choice for a persistant game, unreal engines have abnormally long life span, highly attributable to its optimization possibilities. Unreal 3 has been around almost as long as the ps3, and is still improving! The move to unreal 4 somewhere down the line will be relatively straightforward, there is a large support base both in from unreal and other developers, its cheap and relatively easy to program, and every game on it can be completely different because of its ability to almost assimilate othet engines! An ode to how far its come, look up the character models on XCOM ENEMY UNKOWN, there used to be a time when all player models looked like that no matter what you did, or how about team fortress if I memory serves that to is built on an unreal engine!! CCP couldn't have made a better choice!,
Octavian Vetiver Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 187	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:31:00 - [17] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: NOTE: Now, I had prepared this long list of different features every engine offers and what makes them unique but I decided to scrap it whenever I hit the CryEngine 3 and it's MASSIVE amount of features. So, sorry guys - research on your own time, I've got ** to do. Now, the majority of these are known First Person Shooter engines with some exclusions (Halo, Destiny and Killzone use un-named in-house engines, for example) I've also added the Carbon Engine, developed by CCP, as an option. While it is not used for FPS purposes, I am interested to see how many people vote for it. Which Engine would you want it to be made with?** A.) Frostbite (Developed by DICE - Used in the Battlefield franchise) B.) CryEngine (Developed by Crytek - Used in the Crysis franchise) C.) Forgelight (Developed by SOE - Used in Planetside 2) D.) Source (Developed by Valve - Used in Half-Life franchise) E.) IW Engine (Developed by Infinity Ward - Used in Call of Duty franchise) F.) Carbon Engine (Developed by CCP Games - Used in Eve Online) Take your votes! CryEngine. MechWarrior online uses CryEngine and its a fanatastic mech combat game. I would love to see lots of swarming foot soldiers try to combat Tanks, Mechs, etc on CryEngine. Cry Engine can't handle large amounts of people though. And if CCP gets this to the point of open roam sandbox then you'd see Cry Engine crying in agony.
TEBOW BAGGINS The Corporate Raiders 946	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:39:00 - [18] - Quote frostbite 2
Nguruthos IX Vagina Bombers 1259	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:39:00 - [19] - Quote I don't think this is in the cards right now. Or ever. Unless they worked on it concurrently for release on PS4 which is almost entirely doubtful
Octavian Vetiver Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 187	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:43:00 - [20] - Quote TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: frostbite 2 EA owns it. They don't license out to third parties.

Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2601	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:43:00 - [21] - Quote N1ck Comeau wrote: Can any company even use some of those engines do to ownership reasons? There are licensing agreements you can go into. Titanfall, for instance, is made by many of the developers who worked on Call of Duty - but it operates on Valve's Source engine. Something I find incredible considering the graphical superiority that Titanfall shows when compared to other Source games. Octavian Vetiver wrote: They originally were going to use Carbon engine when the idea was to put it on PC. Whenever they decided to go with console instead they ran into a problem. The first was the issue with Microsoft so no Xbox. The second was the fact that while Carbon works well for EvE. Trying to shoehorn it onto consoles and FPS was a bit of an issue apparently. Carbon can be resource intensive thus the fact it's being used for CQ. The rest of the ones you listed would require A: Large royalties to the companies who own those engines B: It would require them scrapping the Unreal+Carbon mix they're using now and completely remaking the game from scratch almost. It's a fun-poll. It's like fantasy football, you're not supposed to take it seriously....
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 519	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:45:00 - [22] - Quote what about This?
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 519	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:50:00 - [23] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: Can any company even use some of those engines do to ownership reasons? There are licensing agreements you can go into. Titanfall, for instance, is made by many of the developers who worked on Call of Duty - but it operates on Valve's Source engine. Something I find incredible considering the graphical superiority that Titanfall shows when compared to other Source games. Octavian Vetiver wrote: They originally were going to use Carbon engine when the idea was to put it on PC. Whenever they decided to go with console instead they ran into a problem. The first was the issue with Microsoft so no Xbox. The second was the fact that while Carbon works well for EvE. Trying to shoehorn it onto consoles and FPS was a bit of an issue apparently. Carbon can be resource intensive thus the fact it's being used for CQ. The rest of the ones you listed would require A: Large royalties to the companies who own those engines B: It would require them scrapping the Unreal+Carbon mix they're using now and completely remaking the game from scratch almost. It's a fun-poll. It's like fantasy football, you're not supposed to take it seriously.... Oh but with next gen consolles they'd better take an engine swap seriously....unless they want to work with UE 4
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2601	Posted - 2013.09.01 00:56:00 - [24] - Quote xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: what about This? What about these??? http://s.cghub.com/files/Image/533001-534000/533111/832_max.jpg http://s.cghub.com/files/Image/533001-534000/533121/930_max.jpg http://s.cghub.com/files/Image/541001-542000/541333/715_max.jpg http://s.cghub.com/files/Image/538001-539000/538141/463_max.jpg
Meeko Fent Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 750	Posted - 2013.09.01 01:04:00 - [25] - Quote I heard that they originally deved dust in Carbon, so that is what I think would be the obvious choice. Plus CCP has experience in working with carbon, so less chance for hiccups and bugs.
Fizzer94 L.O.T.I.S. 31	Posted - 2013.09.01 01:19:00 - [26] - Quote Preferably the Carbon Engine because it would be familiar to CCP. But Forgelight would be sufficient, it looks great and is built with many players in mind.
Johnny Guilt Algintal Core Gallente Federation 237	Posted - 2013.09.01 02:08:00 - [27] - Quote forgelight just to inject Dust with some color
Adelia Lafayette DUST University Ivy League 206	Posted - 2013.09.01 02:18:00 - [28] - Quote go back to carbon ccp your drunk


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page