"due time" will be third decade if this carries on ! The secondary market won't happen until we have an economy which won't happen until the items we use are manufactured and that can't happen until DUST has manufacture because DUST can't be reliant on Eve to build it's items because if it was DUST still wouldn't have an economy it would just have Eve as an isk sink.

Clones are flesh and blood ... vehicles are alloys and plastics ... flesh and blood dies ... alloys and plastics are destroyed. I think you might be confusing clones with dropsuits.


And your Badger is a Tech 1 ship which get bonuses from skills ... Tech 2 (specialised) ships have role bonuses as well as the skill bonus, the T2 version of your Badger is a Crane which has the Cloak role bonus, you can fit what you want in the highslot of a Badger it would still get it's skill bonus of increased cargo.

Because dropsuits dont explode when they die, good luck picking up all the intestinal pieces.

It also has no role bonus as it's a T1 ship, so it made a wrong conversation point. The thread has been made, damage is already done !

Also Dropsuits cannot be revived since to be revived they must be dead and since you can't kill an inanimate object you can't revive a dropsuit. That's why the repair tool is called a repair tool, because it repairs dropsuits armor, just because some of the nanites in an injector are used to repair the dropsuit doesn't mean you are reviving the inanimate object.

Your last point makes my case ... "If you just want to revive the clone any old rusted Militia thing will do." as it perfectly well does, the militia injector revives the clone without doing much in the way of repairing the dropsuit.

Are YOU going to continue plagueing the forums with this "drivel".

Edit : I've got another 2 films to watch while I read forums on my phone !

To be honest I'm tired of seeing these half brained ideas that would only cause months of development time when simply reducing the cost of the vehicle would achieve the same goal, to quote your OP again "ease the pain of losing a vehicle" and take a few seconds deleting a zero off the end of a few numbers so the devs can get on with, I don't know, developing the game !

I'd rather the thread and many others simply didn't exist, cos someone at CCP has had to waste their time reading through it when they could have used that time thinking about things like how an sp event will be played to get the most from it. Then we might have got a better system before someone else wasted their time writing up a devblog and a forum post to promote it.

There's FAR more important things that need to be developed in this game than a revival tool for vehicles

Incorrect ... I argued against the entirety of the idea here ...

and my reasons for making the idea disappear are here ...


How you manage to figure the rest of those capitals are "important words" is beyond me ... only idea I've got is the feeble mind one you provided.