|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3810
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 23:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's just part of the culture here in New Eden. There is a long history behind that spans 10 years. Apparently a lot more people hate respecs than originally thought. There is a small minority of players within the Eve Online community that still want a respec system for Eve, but CCP and the rest of the community largely ignores them. And considering that the Council of Stellar Management now has stakeholder power in CCP and is entirely player-elected, all of the elected council members were voted in by players who are mostly against respecs within their game.
Of course, Dust 514 already has it own Council of Planetary Management to act as its voice, but it is largely picked by CCP as a preliminary council whose task is to help CCP figure out how to setup a proper voting system so that in the future YOU can vote for whoever you like to represent you and your pro-respec interests. But be aware that the anti-respec crowd will be doing the same. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3813
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:It's just part of the culture here in New Eden. There is a long history behind that spans 10 years. Apparently a lot more people hate respecs than originally thought. There is a small minority of players within the Eve Online community that still want a respec system for Eve, but CCP and the rest of the community largely ignores them. And considering that the Council of Stellar Management now has stakeholder power in CCP and is entirely player-elected, all of the elected council members were voted in by players who are mostly against respecs within their game.
Of course, Dust 514 already has it own Council of Planetary Management to act as its voice, but it is largely picked by CCP as a preliminary council whose task is to help CCP figure out how to setup a proper voting system so that in the future YOU can vote for whoever you like to represent you and your pro-respec interests. But be aware that the anti-respec crowd will be doing the same. you're right, and what it seems like, i their is alot of people who have built up anger against people who went FoTM
Well, if you think about it, it was largely their fault (the players who went FoTM). They just went with what is commonly seen as overpowered when they should have used common sense and pick a profession that best suits them in the long run.
For example, take a look at the tank and dropship drivers. They are currently getting **** on by all the AV folks here. But come 1.5 those guys who stuck around and braved the insults will get the last laugh. Watch. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3815
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:There have been a lot of good ideas on implementing a limited SP refund system. CCP has acknowledged the feedback and said they are discussing whether they will implement a system like it.
look up the 'skillback booster' post. There are ways that we can implement respecs so that they add to everyone's gameplay enjoyment. cool, but wait, if you activate a refund booster, you will still get passive sp gain right? because if not, i might be wrong, but there isn't a point in getting a refund booster. unless the sp refunddaily is drastically higher than the passive sp gain is.
According to the thread that brought it up, the passive SP gain would be deactivated and it takes up a passive booster slot.
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=86041&find=unread |
|
|
|