DUST Search - Logi LAV'S have ruined the game for tankers.

Jason Pearson wrote:

N1ck Comeau wrote:

Jason Pearson wrote:

It's a good thing.

I specced into Proto AV because I'm not a dumb ****, but apparently the majority of the people in this game needed a push into it, chill out, LLAVs only sped up the process of everyone getting proto AV, otherwise we'd be playing for a few more months until everyone realizes how good Proto AV is.

King of the Forums // Seraphim <3
Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here!
Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!

gbghg wrote:

CCP Rejavik
CCP Shanghia

Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step.

I don't mind people having proto AV. If we had proto tanks i would be a lot happier. But currently standard vs proto doesn't fit well.

When we currently only have standard tanks vs 4 guys with proto swarms and forge and grenades. It's very hard not to get destroyed

I'm quite sorry I ever preached the idea of Proto Type tanks, really.

Whilst I understand you and the problems you face as a Tanker, Prototype tanks would create a massive imbalance, something I massively against. You, me and every Tanker in this game wants prototype tanks for a reason, so we can be very powerful and lord over the peasants, I dare a single Tanker to prove me wrong.

We just need to sit tight and play it smart, let the Infantry fools and the AV scrubs come at us, recall your vehicles and be the biggest menace, but do not blame the LLAVs for this, this was going to happen but thankfully these were here to speed it up in time for a much needed fix.

And for those fools demanding a nerf, Vehicle, AV and Infantry, you are all morons. A LLAV needs its tank, not everything must be nerfed through making it weaker to balance it, it must have proper measures taken to restrict its killing power and we must also look at making it more beneficial to kill using the turret (Since LLAvs suffer with a -50% Damage reduction), once properly restricted, take measures to ensure its value on the battlefield as an Infantry and Vehicle support vehicle and its tank will be justified.

King of the Forums // Seraphim <3
Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here!
Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!

gbghg wrote:

CCP Rejavik
CCP Shanghia

Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Void Echo Echo Galactic Industries 1112	Posted - 2013.08.29 08:52:00 - [1] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: It's a good thing. I specced into Proto AV because I'm not a dumb **, but apparently the majority of the people in this game needed a push into it, chill out, LLAVs only sped up the process of everyone getting proto AV, otherwise we'd be playing for a few more months until everyone realizes how good Proto AV is. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step. I don't mind people having proto AV. If we had proto tanks i would be a lot happier. But currently standard vs proto doesn't fit well. When we currently only have standard tanks vs 4 guys with proto swarms and forge and grenades. It's very hard not to get destroyed I'm quite sorry I ever preached the idea of Proto Type tanks, really. Whilst I understand you and the problems you face as a Tanker, Prototype tanks would create a massive imbalance, something I massively against. You, me and every Tanker in this game wants prototype tanks for a reason, so we can be very powerful and lord over the peasants, I dare a single Tanker to prove me wrong. We just need to sit tight and play it smart, let the Infantry fools and the AV scrubs come at us, recall your vehicles and be the biggest menace, but do not blame the LLAVs for this, this was going to happen but thankfully these were here to speed it up in time for a much needed fix. And for those fools demanding a nerf, Vehicle, AV and Infantry, you are all morons. A LLAV needs its tank, not everything must be nerfed through making it weaker to balance it, it must have proper measures taken to restrict its killing power and we must also look at making it more beneficial to kill using the turret (Since LLAvs suffer with a -50% Damage reduction), once properly restricted, take measures to ensure its value on the battlefield as an Infantry and Vehicle support vehicle and its tank will be justified. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote:** CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step. I want prototype tanks so I can finally upgrade my tank to be more survivable and have more firepower, I could care less about ruling over the game. youv just been proven wrong.