|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
717
   |
Posted - 2013.08.28 13:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Good point, hell this has went too far might as well, I mean this has went way too far, but both sides are at it's amazing what anonymity does to people myself included.
Sorry if I went too far an pissed anyone off. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
717
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 13:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Good point, hell this has went too far might as well, I mean this has went way too far, but both sides are at it's amazing what anonymity does to people myself included.
Sorry if I went too far an pissed anyone off.
This is not to say that I am not still against EoN but I don't think making an ass out of myself will help, just beating them in combat... |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
717
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 14:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mavado, I've said it over and over: We don't blame you, but you could be doing more to fix it.
Why sit on 140 districts? If you just want simple fights: Win the fights, sell off the clones, abandon the district, and let others fight over it.
Helping the community isn't reducing the effective size of the map they can play on. Helping the community isn't selling districts back to people at an inflated rate like CUBS is doing now. why do ppl always wanna dump that responsibility on us tho? it wont make a difference, we sell off someone takes we end up coming lookin for a fight again take it , ppl cry , we still in the same boat as we in now with too much crying and not enough pew pewing. The community still needs to fix itself 1st cuz no matter what we gonna look like the "bad guys" or "bullies" even if we just simply lookin for a fight because someone sees they attacked by an EoN corp they go cry. I honestly want them to remove PC and bring back Corp Battles. That way we can fight each other properly, all day, everyday without QQ and get better. Good ol days
Want to start a petition? I'll support it and I bet that some others might too...
I know that Kain has stated this, I wonder what others think...
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
717
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 19:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:I don't think PC needs to be *removed* (though income from it needs to be massively nerfed).
But corp battles need to be an option, so that we can practice FOR PC. Instead of trying to make mini-sandboxes inside PC. Both the cost of clones and the revenue from clone sales should be nerfed. The fact that it hasn't really shows how far out of touch CCP is with it's playerbase. They see all these corps falling apart and stuff and get semis from the New Eden misery, but they fail to realize that many people that bailed after PC burnout haven't come back. If the cost of PC was dramatically reduced it would take a lot of pressure out of the situation. It would just be about fights. For them to even consider such a costly game mode at this stage of development and no Eve connection was pretty naive. CCP already reduced the costs, its the new reduced costs that have ppl now QQing that TP locking their districts and still make a profit. CCP doesnt think when they do ****. They reduced the cost of clone packs with all good intentions but didnt plan for a situation of what would happen if one group had a **** load of land could they still make bank on it. Also ppl wanting the costs reduced need to get real, stop being cheap. EoN came into PC prob one of the poorest alliances. SyN only had about 400M in corp wallet to start PC lol. Sometimes ppl gotta understand that maybe PC is just not for u PC shouldnt be a noob playground, FW is what needs improving so it serves as a middle ground between pubs and PC and a way for corps who not in PC to make some bank to fund their PC ambitiions.
I'd say corp battles should be the middle ground...
FW should be for RPers, and sure as hell needs fixed, FW is THE only place where DUST players effect EVE players.(Can't remember the specifics) |
|
|
| |
|