Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1982
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 22:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
What if infantry could use small turrets on the ground? Could take up a light weapon slot. Could only be used after being planted on the ground. You can't move while using it. Just a little idea.
May the forum trolls have mercy! |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
696
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 23:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:What if infantry could use small turrets on the ground? Could take up a light weapon slot. Could only be used after being planted on the ground. You can't move while using it. Just a little idea. May the forum trolls have mercy!
its a cool idea. but mind you these turrets at the STD level do less DPS than a milita AR...lol |
Komodo Jones
Chaotik Serenity
55
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 23:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Would be great if a small turret were actually useful lol |
Octavian Vetiver
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 00:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
It would be nice to have a small weapon turret you could slap out for defensive positions with some range to them. It's not that the HMG doesn't work well at it. A heavy with HMG makes for a good defensive hold with the close range firepower. It's that not everyone would be able to go heavy in a team for that defensive holding of positions. So it would give others the option to use small turret as that. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
176
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
small blaster turret at mlt level would be deadly in the hands of any if.. the player could move..
assuming we have the unlimited ammo and all... for it.. |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1985
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:small blaster turret at mlt level would be deadly in the hands of any if.. the player could move..
assuming we have the unlimited ammo and all... for it.. Yep, unlimited ammo just like all small turrets. You just can't move, that's the balancing factor. |
Jebediah Mayhew
Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:What if infantry could use small turrets on the ground? Could take up a light weapon slot. Could only be used after being planted on the ground. You can't move while using it. Just a little idea. May the forum trolls have mercy!
I seem to be noticing an idea that eventually CCP is wanting to have the supply depots, railguns, cloning thingies, etc available for deployment by the character. Calling it down as tactical strike in a way. That's in part of what you mean I think.
But on the other hand the question is what to do in small corridors, like securing hallways inside a facility? I think a smaller would be entirely appropriate and fun. I imagine in the end that only decently sized corps will be available to deploy a railgun, so this would kind of be the working man's turret. Something small and automated, good support at a decent cost.
As for those who might say that the damage is negligible, I would say keep in mind the turrets in TF2. I love playing as engies, LOVE IT, and while a turret may not do as much damage as a player's weapons it is usually able to more than make up for it in ACCURACY. Low damage at near 100% accuracy is almost always better than high damage with little accuracy. And again, remember it's a supplement. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
176
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
the breach fg sucks because we cant move but the small turrets.. i think i heavy should be able to move with them while firing.. that would be fair... |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1985
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:the breach fg sucks because we cant move but the small turrets.. i think i heavy should be able to move with them while firing.. that would be fair... Naw that would be OP, it would just be an HMG for non heavies. Bad idea |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1985
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jebediah Mayhew wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:What if infantry could use small turrets on the ground? Could take up a light weapon slot. Could only be used after being planted on the ground. You can't move while using it. Just a little idea. I was thinking that it would either be slow to turn iChat it would only be able to turn 160 degrees from the direction you were facing when you planted it. May the forum trolls have mercy! I seem to be noticing an idea that eventually CCP is wanting to have the supply depots, railguns, cloning thingies, etc available for deployment by the character. Calling it down as tactical strike in a way. That's in part of what you mean I think. But on the other hand the question is what to do in small corridors, like securing hallways inside a facility? I think a smaller would be entirely appropriate and fun. I imagine in the end that only decently sized corps will be available to deploy a railgun, so this would kind of be the working man's turret. Something small and automated, good support at a decent cost. As for those who might say that the damage is negligible, I would say keep in mind the turrets in TF2. I love playing as engies, LOVE IT, and while a turret may not do as much damage as a player's weapons it is usually able to more than make up for it in ACCURACY. Low damage at near 100% accuracy is almost always better than high damage with little accuracy. And again, remember it's a supplement.
|
|
Lillica Deathdealer
Mango and Friends
200
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:What if infantry could use small turrets on the ground? Could take up a light weapon slot. Could only be used after being planted on the ground. You can't move while using it. Just a little idea. May the forum trolls have mercy! I actually support it as a heavy slot that on heavies, because thats a big thing to lug around. Must still be deployable. Alternatively make a whole new class of heavy specifically designed for this that has a small turret slot (lol). It would of course still be deployable. |
XiBravo
TeamPlayers EoN.
176
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
If you are not moving laterally to your enemy you are dead... This is the way of nogungame514 |
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
194
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
if it were an equipment it would be kinda awesome |
Cosgar
ParagonX
4540
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Let's take it a step further with sentry turrets. |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1988
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Let's take it a step further with sentry turrets. I was thinking that the turrets would make a slight barrier around you.
Kind of like this :) |
Jebediah Mayhew
Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:15:00 -
[16] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Cosgar wrote:Let's take it a step further with sentry turrets. I was thinking that the turrets would make a slight barrier around you. Kind of like this :)
Looks good t me. SOmething you've worked on? |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
513
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
There used to be small turret installations, but they were removed. NObody even used them. I wold like to see a heavy ( They weigh more then heavy weapons, yet you want them in a light weapon slot -_-) version, but only as a deployable. And has limited ammo, because vehicles has built in nanohives. |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
1988
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:There used to be small turret installations, but they were removed. NObody even used them. I wold like to see a heavy ( They weigh more then heavy weapons, yet you want them in a light weapon slot -_-) version, but only as a deployable. And has limited ammo, because vehicles has built in nanohives. I don't see why it would be so hard to install a nano hive into a turret.
Any ways, it would be pretty CPU/PG intensive anyways. I'm thinking at least 100 CPU just for the Standard version |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |