Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
291
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 11:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
Hey CCP, honestly is this an acceptable number to you?
Heck you never even peaked past 10,000.
Were these really the numbers you wanted when you decided to call this a AAA massively multiplayer shooter,
" DUST 514 brings intense infantry combat, large-scale warfare, and deep character advancement to a free-to-play massively multiplayer shooter, exclusively on the PlayStation-«3
Wage war in the next generation of first-person shooters, where a single victory could prove the crushing blow to a galactic empire of thousands of online EVE Online-« gamers."
Its kinda embarrassing and sad really.
Hey if any thing you should feel good about one thing. In fact I want to thank you.
You have just given all new to FPS's Devs a road map of what not to do when making a AAA FPS, I hope they use you all as examples of how to screw a FPS up and avoid your mistakes at all cost.
That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again.
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
450
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 11:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
4800 good guys |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die
1923
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Just because there were only 4.8k players on at one time, doesn't mean only 4.8k players play it. |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
267
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) |
DUST 514 Player 12345678914
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
532
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again.
David Reid would like to substitute your reality with his own.
Quote:You know, as Dust continues to grow, there'll be millions of people playing a free-to-play shooter, and we're going to need to accommodate them...it still has to grow to accommodate what happens with Dust, what's going to happen with mobile, other appliances, applications, things we're doing - there's a lot of demand on that computer.
I for one would like a few kilos of whatever the heck David smokes. |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
496
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) I'd say it implies much more than 15k - unless they're all putting in 8 hr shifts every day. 80k - 100k seems like a decent estimate (thats assuming they all play for -on average- a little over an hour a day.) |
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
217
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago)
I guess it comes down to what you mean by "active" players. 15000 seems like a terrible small number. I bet thats # that login everyday. Id say DUST maintains a playerbase of 50-70k a week at least. Got to remember DUST really discourages gameplay once you cap so very few play everyday. |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
255
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) I'd say it implies much more than 15k - unless they're all putting in 8 hr shifts every day. 80k - 100k seems like a decent estimate (thats assuming they all play for -on average- a little over an hour a day.)
Whatever you are smoking, I want some.
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
1164
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
Hey CCP, honestly is this an acceptable number to you?
Heck you never even peaked past 10,000.
Were these really the numbers you wanted when you decided to call this a AAA massively multiplayer shooter,
" DUST 514 brings intense infantry combat, large-scale warfare, and deep character advancement to a free-to-play massively multiplayer shooter, exclusively on the PlayStation-«3
Wage war in the next generation of first-person shooters, where a single victory could prove the crushing blow to a galactic empire of thousands of online EVE Online-« gamers."
Its kinda embarrassing and sad really.
Hey if any thing you should feel good about one thing. In fact I want to thank you.
You have just given all new to FPS's Devs a road map of what not to do when making a AAA FPS, I hope they use you all as examples of how to screw a FPS up and avoid your mistakes at all cost.
That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again.
There is a big siffrence between the number of players playing at any given time, and the number of unique logins throughout the day/week/month.
|
semperfi1999
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
767
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago)
Your joking right......with so much competition? Are you talking about in game competition between players or competition in the FPS genre? Because if your talking about in game competition then your just kidding yourself. This game has little competition as the general player is worse in Dust than they are in COD or BF3. And PC (where the competition is supposed to exist) is now 90% melee glitchers and MDers.
Above all of this the fact still stands....there are more people logged on playing COD4 at one time then there is on Dust 514...... |
|
Bad Heal
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
71
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago)
So in Ten years dust will finally reach 40,000? The dust "Ten year plan"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuiYmyCeqeo
It's kinda like this^ |
DUST 514 Player 12345678914
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
532
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bad Heal wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) So in Ten years dust will finally reach 40,000? The dust "Ten year plan" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuiYmyCeqeoIt's kinda like this^ I just keep thinking the Soviets had five year plans.
Two of those and we'll be golden right?
Right???
|
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
496
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) I'd say it implies much more than 15k - unless they're all putting in 8 hr shifts every day. 80k - 100k seems like a decent estimate (thats assuming they all play for -on average- a little over an hour a day.) Whatever you are smoking, I want some. It's pretty hard to smoke maths and basic logic, although you could try to burn a textbook I guess. |
Zeylon Rho
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1970
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
Hey CCP, honestly is this an acceptable number to you?
Heck you never even peaked past 10,000.
Were these really the numbers you wanted when you decided to call this a AAA massively multiplayer shooter,
" DUST 514 brings intense infantry combat, large-scale warfare, and deep character advancement to a free-to-play massively multiplayer shooter, exclusively on the PlayStation-«3
Wage war in the next generation of first-person shooters, where a single victory could prove the crushing blow to a galactic empire of thousands of online EVE Online-« gamers."
Its kinda embarrassing and sad really.
Hey if any thing you should feel good about one thing. In fact I want to thank you.
You have just given all new to FPS's Devs a road map of what not to do when making a AAA FPS, I hope they use you all as examples of how to screw a FPS up and avoid your mistakes at all cost.
That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again.
There is a big siffrence between the number of players playing at any given time, and the number of unique logins throughout the day/week/month.
No, he's totally right. When I start playing a game, I quit my job and play 24/7 to make sure I'm always counted as a unique player in any census. I'm sure everyone else does that too...
*hold on, need to swap out my colostomy bag*
Anyhow, the important thing is that everyone playing an EVE-associated team shooter will definitely want to leave for a GTA game, because every Dust player has the exact same taste... and will gravitate towards an unrelated title. OP is smart, mark my words. 100% of us will leave the second it comes out, because that's how these things work.
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
714
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) I'd say it implies much more than 15k - unless they're all putting in 8 hr shifts every day. 80k - 100k seems like a decent estimate (thats assuming they all play for -on average- a little over an hour a day.) Whatever you are smoking, I want some. I'd say he's not far off, with the bottom of the bracket somewhere around 40,000 unique players and the top end potentially much higher.
There's a large population of peeps who log back in accasionally to take a look around for positive changes. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
291
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
BF3 #'s
- PC online 42,390
- PS3 online 47,771
- 360 online 20,801
http://bf3stats.com/servers/ |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1137
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
Headdesk headdesk headdesk headdesk headdesk
Just omg no, just no, never become a data analyst ever |
Mamertine Son
R.E.B.E.L.S
193
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 13:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Zeylon Rho wrote: *hold on, need to swap out my colostomy bag*
Dude, how do you do that without making a total mess?
I have trouble with that stupid thing everyday...
|
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
255
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 14:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) I'd say it implies much more than 15k - unless they're all putting in 8 hr shifts every day. 80k - 100k seems like a decent estimate (thats assuming they all play for -on average- a little over an hour a day.) Whatever you are smoking, I want some. It's pretty hard to smoke maths and basic logic, although you could try to burn a textbook I guess.
Some of my best calculus test results came when I was completely stoned.
|
Uravm0d groundforce
Famous.OTF Only The Famous
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago)
so to be considered an active player you have to play 8 hours a day every day? do your maths |
|
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3178
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
Hey CCP, honestly is this an acceptable number to you?
Heck you never even peaked past 10,000.
Were these really the numbers you wanted when you decided to call this a AAA massively multiplayer shooter,
" DUST 514 brings intense infantry combat, large-scale warfare, and deep character advancement to a free-to-play massively multiplayer shooter, exclusively on the PlayStation-«3
Wage war in the next generation of first-person shooters, where a single victory could prove the crushing blow to a galactic empire of thousands of online EVE Online-« gamers."
Its kinda embarrassing and sad really.
Hey if any thing you should feel good about one thing. In fact I want to thank you.
You have just given all new to FPS's Devs a road map of what not to do when making a AAA FPS, I hope they use you all as examples of how to screw a FPS up and avoid your mistakes at all cost.
That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again. Did you literally just compare a Peak-Concurrent-User metric with a total playercount?
Man, I feel embarrassed FOR you. |
Drud Green
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
169
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lol at all the poeple screaming "but but it's not the total amount who play". Of course it's not the the total but that doesn't make 5k PEAK any more impressive. Bring on GTA online! |
Draco Cerberus
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
251
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
Hey CCP, honestly is this an acceptable number to you?
Heck you never even peaked past 10,000.
Were these really the numbers you wanted when you decided to call this a AAA massively multiplayer shooter,
" DUST 514 brings intense infantry combat, large-scale warfare, and deep character advancement to a free-to-play massively multiplayer shooter, exclusively on the PlayStation-«3
Wage war in the next generation of first-person shooters, where a single victory could prove the crushing blow to a galactic empire of thousands of online EVE Online-« gamers."
Its kinda embarrassing and sad really.
Hey if any thing you should feel good about one thing. In fact I want to thank you.
You have just given all new to FPS's Devs a road map of what not to do when making a AAA FPS, I hope they use you all as examples of how to screw a FPS up and avoid your mistakes at all cost.
That way we will not see garbage like this get released ever again. What you seem to be saying is that there aren't as many people playing the game as you would like to see. I agree that we need more different people to shoot at that maybe haven't been playing since closed beta or even open beta but consider the number of players playing during the betas at any one time we can conclude that the numbers haven't changed a whole lot, if anything they have gotten slightly smaller even if the number of accounts has tripled or quadrupled due to the release from only one account per system (NDA and EULA).
This game is in need of some serious work short term to make it attractive to new players and to old players alike, something that grabs their attention and holds it, the holy grail, something, anything other than more Neo Suits or new pay to use guns. The filler between the cracks. Bring PVE to DUST please.
Problem: Identified Solution: Given ETA: Not today or tomorrow Dev Response: ??? |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
293
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
Drud Green wrote:Lol at all the poeple screaming "but but it's not the total amount who play". Of course it's not the the total but that doesn't make 5k PEAK any more impressive. Bring on GTA online! More like fanboys in denial that their game is on its last breaths.
When you have to use excuses like, "Just because there were only 4.8k players on at one time, doesn't mean only 4.8k players play it."
You know that the end is SoonGäó |
Poonmunch
DUST University Ivy League
207
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
So?
DUST is free to play.
I always have a ton of opponents when I sign on, so however many are playing doesn't really matter to me.
I never have to wait long to get a game either.
Munch
|
Lillica Deathdealer
Mango and Friends
172
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Well when you think about it, this is still pretty much beta. Maybe they're waiting for all the trolls to drop out and get real feedback from the dedicated fellas? Either way, I have my full faith and confidence that CCP makes enough money to support this game for a really long time, on top of giving it a comeback when big fancy crowd-bringing features are in place. Mind you this money probably isnt from Dust. |
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
425
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Drud Green wrote:Lol at all the poeple screaming "but but it's not the total amount who play". Of course it's not the the total but that doesn't make 5k PEAK any more impressive. Bring on GTA online! More like fanboys in denial that their game is on its last breaths. When you have to use excuses like, "Just because there were only 4.8k players on at one time, doesn't mean only 4.8k players play it." You know that the end is SoonGäó
You lack of good trolling techniques.
Some ancient trolling lore can be found written on the yellow lines painted on modern pathways; go look for it!
[Hint: Bring some magnifier glasses and some free time; it is written really small and it's hard to find] |
Marek Seven
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:29:00 -
[28] - Quote
Bad Heal wrote:Vallud Eadesso wrote:That's consistent across all time zones, fluctuating up and down depending on where and when.
So 4000 - 5000 concurrent permanently implies around 15,000 active players. That's not bad for a game with so much competition.
I still remember the day when EVE broke 10,000. Was apparently big news. (God i'm getting old. That was 10 years ago) So in Ten years dust will finally reach 40,000? The dust "Ten year plan" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuiYmyCeqeoIt's kinda like this^
He meant 40k logged in at one time, on one server. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
294
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
Anarchide wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Drud Green wrote:Lol at all the poeple screaming "but but it's not the total amount who play". Of course it's not the the total but that doesn't make 5k PEAK any more impressive. Bring on GTA online! More like fanboys in denial that their game is on its last breaths. When you have to use excuses like, "Just because there were only 4.8k players on at one time, doesn't mean only 4.8k players play it." You know that the end is SoonGäó You lack of good trolling techniques. Some ancient trolling lore can be found written on the yellow lines painted on modern pathways; go look for it! [Hint: Bring some magnifier glasses and some free time; it is written really small and it's hard to find]
You responded!
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
526
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 17:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Locked for trolling. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |