Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1353
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 03:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
if there was a war between the USA and russia and no allied nations stepped in who do u think would win? now I know a few of u are american so please don't just say america would win because 'merica |
XANDER KAG
Red Star. EoN.
185
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 03:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
But...but.. Its MERUCA!
But seriously it would come down to too many things to calculate, America couldn't attack in winter or we lose, but America has so many rednecks with sooo many guns that Russia would never truly beat us....
To sum it up, whoever wins the air war wins.... |
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion
1190
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 07:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
The reason they stopped directly fighting each other is because the amount of nuclear and atomic weaponry on both sides meant if one side unleashed, the other side would retaliate and essentially, both sides are destroyed.
Mutually assured destruction.
But if they agree not to use that kind of massive-scale weaponry, then I'd say Russia. America would kick arse initially but if they push into Siberia, the Russians will use its harsh climate to their advantage and perform a massive counterattack and come out victorious. Unless the U.S. is smart enough not to force their way though the Siberian plains, where your **** freezes before it hits the ground. |
Buddha Brown
Factory Fresh
279
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 14:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
After ww2 I dont think anyone is going marching in to a Russian winter. As stated above I think it comes down to the air battle and the shear force and level of exp/training will go to US.
But it's a terrible scenario and I think nobody wins, regardless of outcome |
Ansiiis The Trustworthy
WE ARE LEGENDS
247
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 23:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Would never happen. Russia has more nukes than US can repel, US has more planes that Russia can shoot down.
|
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
396
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 00:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Because Canada
Is the guy in the middle. You have USA and Russia each side. That's what happened! |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
504
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 00:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ivan Drago was robbed. |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1360
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 00:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:Ivan Drago was robbed. ? |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
504
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 01:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:Rynoceros wrote:Ivan Drago was robbed. ?
Rocky IV |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1361
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 01:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:Draxus Prime wrote:Rynoceros wrote:Ivan Drago was robbed. ? Rocky IV oh i never watched those movies |
|
RuckingFetard
Better Hide R Die
485
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 12:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vyzion Eyri wrote:The reason they stopped directly fighting each other is because the amount of nuclear and atomic weaponry on both sides meant if one side unleashed, the other side would retaliate and essentially, both sides are destroyed.
Mutually assured destruction.
But if they agree not to use that kind of massive-scale weaponry, then I'd say Russia. America would kick arse initially but if they push into Siberia, the Russians will use its harsh climate to their advantage and perform a massive counterattack and come out victorious. Unless the U.S. is smart enough not to force their way though the Siberian plains, where your **** freezes before it hits the ground. Ya'know what? While playing a 1950s Europe version of RISK as the Italians on the entire European continent as background uptil Moscow and then 1 state, after many tears were shed over Warsaw and Budapest, I , with the help of the French ( I know right? Lol) managed to decisively defeat the soviets, while 'Murica was reduced to just a small part of Germany.
Nuclear war be damned |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
242
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 15:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Wolverines! the 1984 version not that crappy 2012 version either. |
Sergamon Draco
Rautaleijona Top Men.
93
|
Posted - 2013.08.17 17:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ok you want to know who is the real winner if that scenario turns out,ok i tell you its china |
Shattered Mirage
D.A.R.K Academy D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
114
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 00:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
Anarchide wrote:Because CanadaIs the guy in the middle. You have USA and Russia each side. That's what happened!
Quote: Potato chip man, potato chip man, does whatever a potaton++ chip man can.
|
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
315
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 01:39:00 -
[15] - Quote
The truth is the US has the most funded and technologically advanced military in the world. You can take any two military's in the world and combine there yearly defense budget and you will not come close to the US. If you think you can somehow gauge our military on our current power platform you are wrong. Key word is DARPA, DARPA is the US military's mad scientist division and is the creator of such wonderful inventions as HAARP and the weaponized drone. These along with scaler technology, railgun technology, and stealth technology will blow your freakin mind if you knew what we really have. The truth is the world has no clue what lurks behind our curtains. When the DDX destroyer and our new battle tanks come into play the world will marvel and tremble when they see the vast amount power one of these can deliver. I pray these toys of obliteration are never shown, for when they are that will only mean one thing and that is SHHTF. |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1365
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 02:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
calvin b wrote:The truth is the US has the most funded and technologically advanced military in the world. You can take any two military's in the world and combine there yearly defense budget and you will not come close to the US. If you think you can somehow gauge our military on our current power platform you are wrong. Key word is DARPA, DARPA is the US military's mad scientist division and is the creator of such wonderful inventions as HAARP and the weaponized drone. These along with scaler technology, railgun technology, and stealth technology will blow your freakin mind if you knew what we really have. The truth is the world has no clue what lurks behind our curtains. When the DDX destroyer and our new battle tanks come into play the world will marvel and tremble when they see the vast amount power one of these can deliver. I pray these toys of obliteration are never shown, for when they are that will only mean one thing and that is SHHTF. meh russia has more nukes and it doesn't matter how high tech your tank is when it gets nuked |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1900
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 04:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
Excluding nukes...
If Russia can defeat America's Navy, they would probably win. If they do that before the U.S can get them to the Russian coast, than they will have a great advantage.
Though, to be honest, it would probably be a very close war. Just far too many variables. |
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
316
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 05:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:calvin b wrote:The truth is the US has the most funded and technologically advanced military in the world. You can take any two military's in the world and combine there yearly defense budget and you will not come close to the US. If you think you can somehow gauge our military on our current power platform you are wrong. Key word is DARPA, DARPA is the US military's mad scientist division and is the creator of such wonderful inventions as HAARP and the weaponized drone. These along with scaler technology, railgun technology, and stealth technology will blow your freakin mind if you knew what we really have. The truth is the world has no clue what lurks behind our curtains. When the DDX destroyer and our new battle tanks come into play the world will marvel and tremble when they see the vast amount power one of these can deliver. I pray these toys of obliteration are never shown, for when they are that will only mean one thing and that is SHHTF. meh russia has more nukes and it doesn't matter how high tech your tank is when it gets nuked
Russian nukes are at best cold war technology. They have yet to move to the next generation of tactical nukes. If you think this is the one thing that will win or draw a stalemate your wrong. Ever heard of a scram jet, this is the answer to any Nuke weapon. Again the US is currently 1 almost 2 generations ahead of any nation. Russia's technology is old and decrepit that is why there naval and air force has not been seen on a larger scale. They lack the funds and technology. The key to any great nation is a Deep water Navy, the US is the only nation at this time with such. |
BARDAS
DUST University Ivy League
316
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 06:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
The answer is obviously China because they would sneak attack while we were all crippled from stupidly attacking each other. In reality no one wants to start the war because suddenly everyone discovered money and global trade is much better than killing each other to be king of a mud hill somewhere. |
Shattered Mirage
D.A.R.K Academy D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
117
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 07:07:00 -
[20] - Quote
BARDAS wrote:The answer is obviously China because they would sneak attack while we were all crippled from stupidly attacking each other. In reality no one wants to start the war because suddenly everyone discovered money and global trade is much better than killing each other to be king of a mud hill somewhere.
Teh population demandz a waaaar!
Seriously though... 7,105,484,000 humans in this world isn't exactly healthy for the planet with how much we demand.
Global Population. |
|
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
613
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 08:06:00 -
[21] - Quote
USA would win by miles. Why you ask? Because there are many people like myself that would see to it. This Thursday I went and bought 4 42 round mags for my Bushmaster AR. Which goes great with my RL Nova Knife. |
AlleyKatPr0
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 12:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Whatever the size of the US military, I can safely say it is not greater than the total number of citizens in Russia - and they wouldn't let anyone try and take their land.
And there is a hellavalot of land, way way way way way more than the states (4 times the size?) and there is no way in hell the US could take that land and put a flag on it.
The only way to take that land would be the total and utter eradication of every single living person from the land, and that means nukes or plague or zombies or some freaky space tech.
In raw army stats, the US has got the largest, but that also means it has got the largest number of idiots, using raw mean IQ averages of the USA compared to every other nation on the planet.
Hong Kong has the highest IQ, btw.
For those of you that can; think about it. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
622
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 16:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
AlleyKatPr0 wrote:Whatever the size of the US military, I can safely say it is not greater than the total number of citizens in Russia - and they wouldn't let anyone try and take their land.
And there is a hellavalot of land, way way way way way more than the states (4 times the size?) and there is no way in hell the US could take that land and put a flag on it.
The only way to take that land would be the total and utter eradication of every single living person from the land, and that means nukes or plague or zombies or some freaky space tech.
In raw army stats, the US has got the largest, but that also means it has got the largest number of idiots, using raw mean IQ averages of the USA compared to every other nation on the planet.
Hong Kong has the highest IQ, btw.
For those of you that can; think about it.
Thanks for rambling but US population is double Russia's. You have more land but no one lives there. That's why a meteorite hit there and no one cared to studied it for decades.
P.S. North Korea has the largest army. |
Shattered Mirage
D.A.R.K Academy D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
126
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 19:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:AlleyKatPr0 wrote:Whatever the size of the US military, I can safely say it is not greater than the total number of citizens in Russia - and they wouldn't let anyone try and take their land.
And there is a hellavalot of land, way way way way way more than the states (4 times the size?) and there is no way in hell the US could take that land and put a flag on it.
The only way to take that land would be the total and utter eradication of every single living person from the land, and that means nukes or plague or zombies or some freaky space tech.
In raw army stats, the US has got the largest, but that also means it has got the largest number of idiots, using raw mean IQ averages of the USA compared to every other nation on the planet.
Hong Kong has the highest IQ, btw.
For those of you that can; think about it. Thanks for rambling but US population is double Russia's. You have more land but no one lives there. That's why a meteorite hit there and no one cared to studied it for decades. P.S. North Korea has the largest army.
The United States currently has 1,447,896 active duty personnel and 1,458,500 in its active reserve personnel. Its approximately 4,217,413 potential army entrants each year greatly contribute to its already enormous military population. it also the most highly trained troops and most powerful arsenal by far. Its land forces alone utilize 8,325 tanks, 18,539 armored fighting vehicles, 1,934 self-propelled guns, 1,791 towed artillery pieces, and 1,330 rocket projectors.
China is said to employ approximately 2,285,000 active personnel. It is said to have 8,500 tanks, 61 submarines, 54 surface ships, and 4,000 fighter jets.
[url]http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3702655/from/RL.2/#.UhEZRrxBHQw[/url] [url]http://www.globalfirepower.com/[/url] [url]http://opishposh.com/10-largest-armies-in-the-world/[/url] ] EDIT: Hmm.... you'll have to copy & paste the links; for some reason the [url][/url isn't working. |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
247
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 19:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
We have Chuck Norris and Clint Eastwood along with The Rock. That is all we need. |
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 20:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
Out of all the statistics without a deep water navy, no one can successfully launch any prolong attack against any nation. The US is the only one with a true deep water navy, end of conversation. |
AlleyKatPr0
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 10:26:00 -
[27] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Thanks for rambling but US population is double Russia's.
Seeing how hardly any of them have a passport or could run farther than 10 metres, I think Russian citizens would fend off any invasion with ease.
Want some fries with that triple heart by-pass?
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
897
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 11:24:00 -
[28] - Quote
Whoever fires the 1st nuke |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
897
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 11:25:00 -
[29] - Quote
AlleyKatPr0 wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Thanks for rambling but US population is double Russia's. Seeing how hardly any of them have a passport or could run farther than 10 metres, I think Russian citizens would fend off any invasion with ease. Want some fries with that triple heart by-pass?
I just completely lost it |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
248
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 12:13:00 -
[30] - Quote
AlleyKatPr0 wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Thanks for rambling but US population is double Russia's. Seeing how hardly any of them have a passport or could run farther than 10 metres, I think Russian citizens would fend off any invasion with ease. Want some fries with that triple heart by-pass?
Who won the most medals in the last two Olympics? Winter and Summer?
Oh that's right, the USA.
You really should not pay attention to generalizations. There are plenty of fat people in every country.
PS, what country was that dude from that knocked out Antonio Silva, hmmmmmmmm let me think, oh yeah, some place called merica or something like that.
|
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1366
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 12:55:00 -
[31] - Quote
guys dont ******* make fun of each others nation your as bad as the ammar |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
249
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 13:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:guys dont ******* make fun of each others nation your as bad as the ammar
^ This
However, we still have Chuck Norris. Although we do apologize for the Khardasians and the cast of Jersey Shore.
|
AlleyKatPr0
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 11:18:00 -
[33] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:Who won the most medals in the last two Olympics? Winter and Summer?
Oh that's right, the USA.
You really should not pay attention to generalizations. There are plenty of fat people in every country.
PS, what country was that dude from that knocked out Antonio Silva, hmmmmmmmm let me think, oh yeah, some place called merica or something like that.
Great, so put them on the front line to confuse everyone with sychronished swimming, oh wait...USA didn't win that event...maybe it would be confusing afterall...
As for obesity, USA always wins that event
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1367
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 13:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
STOP your off topic guys |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
250
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 15:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
AlleyKatPr0 wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:Who won the most medals in the last two Olympics? Winter and Summer?
Oh that's right, the USA.
You really should not pay attention to generalizations. There are plenty of fat people in every country.
PS, what country was that dude from that knocked out Antonio Silva, hmmmmmmmm let me think, oh yeah, some place called merica or something like that. Great, so put them on the front line to confuse everyone with sychronished swimming, oh wait...USA didn't win that event...maybe it would be confusing afterall... As for obesity, USA always wins that event
As for stupidity not to mention racism, and ultra nationalism, you win that one hands down, not to mention the all time medal for ignorance for bashing an entire of nation. All countries have their share of idiots and fat people. Yet you cast aspersions freely. Where ever you are from, I will not blame that entire people based upon your inane comments. This is what makes me better than you. Bye bye now and have a nice day and may you live long and prosper.
|
AlleyKatPr0
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 15:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:As for stupidity not to mention racism, and ultra nationalism, you win that one hands down, not to mention the all time medal for ignorance for bashing an entire of nation. All countries have their share of idiots and fat people. Yet you cast aspersions freely. Where ever you are from, I will not blame that entire people based upon your inane comments. This is what makes me better than you. Bye bye now and have a nice day and may you live long and prosper.
How was the USA founded? Oh, that's right... Do American children have to pledge allegiance to 'the flag' everyday? Oh, that's right... How many years did America take human beings from other countries and enslave them, using the proceeds to further their wealth and power, and then kill them when they were no longer needed, or sell them, or use them as breeding stock for more slaves? Oh, that's right...(see: NFL, NBA) Do Americans think they are better than everyone else? Oh, that's right...
Nice spelling and grammar btw, and nice contradictory statements proving yourself utterly wrong and defenseless.
Have a nice day, please come again and I'm just happy to be here, too.
PS: Americans are not a 'race', they are just as mongrel as anyone else. |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
252
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 16:11:00 -
[37] - Quote
AlleyKatPr0 wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:As for stupidity not to mention racism, and ultra nationalism, you win that one hands down, not to mention the all time medal for ignorance for bashing an entire of nation. All countries have their share of idiots and fat people. Yet you cast aspersions freely. Where ever you are from, I will not blame that entire people based upon your inane comments. This is what makes me better than you. Bye bye now and have a nice day and may you live long and prosper. How was the USA founded? Oh, that's right... Do American children have to pledge allegiance to 'the flag' everyday? Oh, that's right... How many years did America take human beings from other countries and enslave them, using the proceeds to further their wealth and power, and then kill them when they were no longer needed, or sell them, or use them as breeding stock for more slaves? Oh, that's right...(see: NFL, NBA) Do Americans think they are better than everyone else? Oh, that's right... Nice spelling and grammar btw, and nice contradictory statements proving yourself utterly wrong and defenseless. Have a nice day, please come again and I'm just happy to be here, too. PS: Americans are not a 'race', they are just as mongrel as anyone else.
All nations were founded in blood. Have you ever heard of the Feudal system? What do you think that was? Your jealousy and hatred is showing more and more clearly. You also, continue with the name calling when the rest of us here have not indulged in such childish behavior even when rebuking your ridiculous comments. You really need to go read some world history chief. Now go away, I grow tired of this as I suspect you are trolling.
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1367
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 18:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
*sigh*
|
AlleyKatPr0
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 19:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:All nations were founded in blood. Have you ever heard of the Feudal system? What do you think that was? Your jealousy and hatred is showing more and more clearly. You also, continue with the name calling when the rest of us here have not indulged in such childish behavior even when rebuking your ridiculous comments. You really need to go read some world history chief. Now go away, I grow tired of this as I suspect you are trolling.
That's assumption, not extrapolation.
And...I don't need to name call, history, as you clearly put it, has already named and shamed you.
Hiding behind assumed dominance is very, very telling. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |