|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 46 post(s) |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
269
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 22:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
LRMXxX wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:Someone just asked about whether teams should report results. Yes you should; while we will be providing results for verification, this is done a day or two after all the matches are finished and player updates will be much faster. I know it's not your job, but do you have any idea how to ? Urgent Fury website isn't realy user friendly
I ask the same thing, if theres one webside which is heavy and hard to navigate its UF |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
271
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 14:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Great changes +1
Significant improvements from round 1 to round 2. Hopefully all the kinks will be ironed out by friday and we can all get settled in to this tournament!
It would be great if some instructions for reporting on the UF site could be posted, as its not very clear to say the least.
Also great communication CCP Logibro, this is how this tournament will succeed. Now to get everyone to show and be ready for a real battle!
Chicago, report here, http://www.urgentfury.com/ladders.php?do=challenges&mid=1244#match1244
as far as i could understand it allows the upload of 1 image or screenshot and it needs either the enemy team or CCP confirmation |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
271
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 22:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Thanks for the updates.
Is this actually a tournament or a league? Also the EU board hasnt been updated at all, any idea whats going on there? If you guys haven't been posting the results then it won't be updated yet. I'll be forwarding the results we've got to UF after the NA rounds today.
Logibro, we have been posting the results, but so far we are still with 0 rounds on the board. Mondays match will be rematched (altough the Venezuela Corp did not show up), wednesday we won 3-0 against Ninth Legion Freelance, and today we had also a no show by Academy Inferno. If our oponnents dont post the results its not our fault. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
271
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 23:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thank you. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
273
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 11:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Well, the UF website is one of the worst i have seen, its heavy on resources, it loads up several plugins and apps at the same time, takes quite a while to fully load and its hard to navigate on, also they never heard of Networks and static IPs because your workbuddy cant register if you have already registered from the same IP, all that and the general look of it does not chime in as being professional, so, sorry, but i have to disagree. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
276
|
Posted - 2013.08.18 23:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Absolute Idiom II wrote:Getting sarcasm is hard?
Online? yes, it is. Specially in this forum, if it was sarcasm you inferred, then my apologies. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
279
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 13:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Monday, the 19th, and still the EU ladder in UF hasnt been updated. Great job guys... |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 08:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hey Logibro, what the hell is wrong the the EU ladder? We still have ZERO wins, with 3 games played, 2 wins and 1 loss. This is starting to look like a prank or something |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 08:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:KatanaPT wrote:Hey Logibro, what the hell is wrong the the EU ladder? We still have ZERO wins, with 3 games played, 2 wins and 1 loss. This is starting to look like a prank or something Spoke to UF this afternoon, they've been out of office for the beginning of the week. They're looking to have it all sorted by tomorrow.
Thank you . *fingers crossed* |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 08:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hey Logibro, UF just said this:
"Shane To speak to the updates, it is the teams responsibilities to report and confirm wars. That is why it is not updating teams are not reporting"
i ALREADY told you and them, its not our fault that enemy teams havent posted the results, and i had the impression that CCP gave them the server data to verify in case of these exact situations, we have 4 games played, 3 wins 1 loss so far. And for the love of God, next time you do a tournament, use your own tools, server data and team, instead of relying on unprofessional websites that only asked for people to register, which, once this crap ends, i will ask everyone on my team to unregister. |
|
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
295
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 00:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
Traky78 wrote:Packy CS1 wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:So, today's quarterfinals:
Time: Starts 2030 UTC 2013-09-09 . Format: Best of 3 (same format as previous matches) Quarterfinal 1: No Free Pass vs What The French Quarterfinal 2: Ninth Legion Freelance vs RUST415 Quarterfinal 3: Tech Guard vs Academy Inferno Quarterfinal 4: La501 eme vs Grupo de asalto chacal
Semifinals Time: Wednesday 2030UTC 2013-09-11 Format: Best of three Semifinal 1: Winner Quarterfinal 1 and 2 Semifinal 2: Winner Quarterfinal 3 and 4
Finals Time: Friday 1830UTC 2013-09-11 Format: Best of seven Finals: Winner Semifinal 1 and 2 Runner up Finals: Loser Semifinal 1 and 2 Sorry, I can't help myself, that pink elephant in the room is just too big to ignore. 1. Why make us play a round robin league, if afterwards it is going to be decided by a bracket tournament? What's the point of the 3 previous weeks? A league of 10, to eliminate 2 teams and have a bracket tournament of 8? And 2 of those 8 have not played a single match? 2. I wonder if you have noticed that Academy Inferno and Ninth Legion Freelance have not showed up for a single game. So Rust 415 and Tech Guard get a free pass (no pun intended) to the semifinal. Why are you going out of your way to make this tournament as convoluted, complex and tiresome as you can? We came for fun battles. And the ones we have had have been fun, but few and far between all those no shows. And now we have to do it all over again. Complex =|= smart, CCP. Kudos to Logibro for trying his best to do his job, and to the other corps that actually showed to play. It seems this will take a little longer yet. PD: I blame American Sport Leagues for the league+playoff system. They only did it to squeeze more money from their followers, but it's been copied by everyone. + 1 000 000 Ninth Legion Freelance and Academy Inferno didn't show up in the tournament and they are in quarters final ? So RUST415 and Tech Guard 'll have a free ticket for the semis ? CCP, your tournament is a shame Logibro, thank's for your work
Dude before saying wrong things, check your facts, Ninth Legion Freelance showed up and we won against them.
|
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
296
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 00:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Packy CS1 wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:So, today's quarterfinals:
Time: Starts 2030 UTC 2013-09-09 . Format: Best of 3 (same format as previous matches) Quarterfinal 1: No Free Pass vs What The French Quarterfinal 2: Ninth Legion Freelance vs RUST415 Quarterfinal 3: Tech Guard vs Academy Inferno Quarterfinal 4: La501 eme vs Grupo de asalto chacal
Semifinals Time: Wednesday 2030UTC 2013-09-11 Format: Best of three Semifinal 1: Winner Quarterfinal 1 and 2 Semifinal 2: Winner Quarterfinal 3 and 4
Finals Time: Friday 1830UTC 2013-09-11 Format: Best of seven Finals: Winner Semifinal 1 and 2 Runner up Finals: Loser Semifinal 1 and 2 Sorry, I can't help myself, that pink elephant in the room is just too big to ignore. 1. Why make us play a round robin league, if afterwards it is going to be decided by a bracket tournament? What's the point of the 3 previous weeks? A league of 10, to eliminate 2 teams and have a bracket tournament of 8? And 2 of those 8 have not played a single match? 2. I wonder if you have noticed that Academy Inferno and Ninth Legion Freelance have not showed up for a single game. So Rust 415 and Tech Guard get a free pass (no pun intended) to the semifinal. Why are you going out of your way to make this tournament as convoluted, complex and tiresome as you can? We came for fun battles. And the ones we have had have been fun, but few and far between all those no shows. And now we have to do it all over again. Complex =|= smart, CCP. Kudos to Logibro for trying his best to do his job, and to the other corps that actually showed to play. It seems this will take a little longer yet. PD: I blame American Sport Leagues for the league+playoff system. They only did it to squeeze more money from their followers, but it's been copied by everyone. Wrong, Nith Legion Freelance showed up for our game at least. We won 3 - 0
|
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
296
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 00:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Academy Inferno didnt showed up to our match today. I think lack of information is the only thing to blame as there are no scheduled matches on UF. And as a sidenote, for the LOVE OF GOD, never use UF again to organize a Dust tournament. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
296
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 00:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Also, and im sorry for the spam, what is it with UTC and not just post the matches in EVETIME? I know evetime is utc but most of my corp dont. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
297
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 09:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
Packy CS1 wrote:Well, they didn't show for ours. And from WTF and NFP comments, they didn't show to their fights either. The same with Academy Inferno. My bet is that they didn't show up for their quarter final match, but Rust 415 is the only one that can confirm that.
Yes, i understand that, hombre, but they did show up for ours, i understand we are in no way in the same level as Gac, Wtf and Nfp, but us being in this tournament is not tottally out of credit :P, and altough we will get crushed again this wednesday, we hope to at least put up some sort of resistance, even in the way a body resists to plasma bullets :P |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
297
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 23:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
GG GAC, we lost 3-0 against them, altough we didnt had a full team we managed to at least put up a fight, or something close to it :P |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
299
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 14:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
In all honesty, this tournament is a perfect example on how you should NOT do a tournament:
First, the communication process which is terrible with teams not knowing in what date and hour their matches were suposed to be and the only way to find out was with a inconsistent and heavy on the browser website that basically said FU to our attempts to sort this
Second, the need to register each and everyone in a foreign website when clearly there is no need for it when what we are representing is the corp and not players, next time just do corp vs corp ( i know everything about ringers and that crap, but as long the player is a veteran of said corp there is no need to mistrust) and obviously CCP tracks all the stats of who belongs to whom and when we play and who kills what.
Third, the way some teams clearly gave a crap should have been a warning they woulndt even participate in the tournament, you miss one game and your out of the torney, final. A kick in the arse.
Fourth, altough we are fighting for third place in EU league (as if...) , i feel as a player that this is strongly unfair to the top 3 teams and specially the best team in the EU, which is NFP.
Fifth. For the love of God, next time dont rely on UF for brackets, setting dates, etc, CCP should do this using ONLY EVETIME, and in a way every member of any corp should be informed, via ingame mail, announcement, etc, so everyone knows their games and dates.
Sixth. I hope my wife feeds me friday during the excruciating 7 games in a row. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
304
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 11:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Packy CS1 wrote:smartlayer wrote:
If the other EU team have only used registered members for all matches then only WTF will be removed from the tournament from the EU league
GAC has only used registered players that were on the team during the tournament. When our best player, pazificador IRON, left our corp to join Serpahim Initiative during the league phase, we kicked him from the tournament team and didn't use him anymore, just to be on the safe side. That can be checked easily by CCP in the Urgent Fury site and looking at his employment history. We fought with less than 16 people against 501 and Techguard during the league phase. Also against Rust415, but that was because the starting time for the match was messed up. We had quite a few good players sitting on the corp chat that we didn't use because they are not registered. They would have given us and edge or helped us balance the team. If the tournament had ended at the round robin phase, everyone would have been satisfied. Now we have this mess. When CCP decides what they want to do, then we will do the same. No hard feelings to anyone, just disappointed with the whole tournament thing. I will not be participating again in one, that's for sure. EDIT: And the fact that we followed the rules, does not mean that we don't think some of them are stupid. Making people registering on UF to participate was a bad move. A lot of the no shows and low player participation owe to that. Having the corps registered and making sure that only players with at least a 15 days or a month in the corp could participate would have made things easier, and more fun, for everyone.
Indeed, last match we had about 10 or 11 too, and i was wondering where the hell was Pazificador |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
304
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 11:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Have just found out we were disqualified for using non registered players (in a match where we used about 10 guys), altough i am fairly certain we always used registered players, could i have the name of the player or players we used who wasnt registered? Thank you |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
305
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 11:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:KatanaPT wrote:Have just found out we were disqualified for using non registered players (in a match where we used about 10 guys), altough i am fairly certain we always used registered players, could i have the name of the player or players we used who wasnt registered? Thank you If you submit a ticket we can give you this information. Please file it under DUST 514 Community & Forums.
Thank you! |
|
|
|
|