|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1062
   |
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Now about the shield stacked person, it only takes me one shot to kill them. Heard about the the Flux ?!
Which of the  TWO weapons that you are using to ONE SHOT the guy do you use to kill him in ONE SHOT again? Is it the Flux or the MD? |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1063
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Now about the shield stacked person, it only takes me one shot to kill them. Heard about the the Flux ?! Which of the TWO weapons that you are using to ONE SHOT the guy do you use to kill him in ONE SHOT again? Is it the Flux or the MD? The great Flux+MD combo... i've never seen so many Flux nades being used before. Oh btw, i also use it as an AV weapon. Tank count 7 (Gunlogis) and counting. Its difficult with the Madrugar. Quite a lot of LAVs, some Logi ones too. Now tell me it's not OP.
Its not OP. Do you not get basic math?
1 flux + 1 MD = 2 weapons NOT 1. YOU CANNOT OHK with MD (PERIOD).
Also if you are running with a squad it means you are utilizing its support role well. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1067
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Now about the shield stacked person, it only takes me one shot to kill them. Heard about the the Flux ?! Which of the TWO weapons that you are using to ONE SHOT the guy do you use to kill him in ONE SHOT again? Is it the Flux or the MD? The great Flux+MD combo... i've never seen so many Flux nades being used before. Oh btw, i also use it as an AV weapon. Tank count 7 (Gunlogis) and counting. Its difficult with the Madrugar. Quite a lot of LAVs, some Logi ones too. Now tell me it's not OP. Its not OP. Do you not get basic math? 1 flux + 1 MD = 2 weapons NOT 1. YOU CANNOT OHK with MD (PERIOD). Also if you are running with a squad it means you are utilizing its support role well. Yes i do get the math. The point is the MD needs no effort. It's no longer a support weapon. Its one of the most annoying weapon to encounter. I can OHK kill and i have quite a few times. Trust me i've laughed very hard at that red dot. to be honest, most of us are using it now to have some fun and relax.
Okay...do you use a flux grenade when you OHK? |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1067
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tallen Ellecon wrote:All these "nerf the assault MD" because it "takes no skill" are so ridiculous. It doesn't do enough damage to be a viable killer, but it can be an effective area denial weapon. Stop getting "OP" confused with "different".
Yeah pretty much. And most users follow around the blue swarm and use the MD to mop up what others are shooting at. In that way they are using it exactly as the support weapon it is designed for. AR user strips half of the HP, likely most of the shield, player retreats to cover, MD says "no, goodby". MD user gets the kill for the 'work' that the AR user is doing. In other times and places this is called cooperation. In FPS games players are convinced that they should legitimately always have 1v1 full health fights as the measuring stick for how battles are fought and balanced. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1070
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Beren I Aim for the Head. It's a wonderful sound. Makes me Feel OP when i get a Headshot with a MD.
Ah there it is, headshots are OP. Lol. Any headshots from greater than 20m out are luck. And other weapons can OHK with headshots so that is easily not considered OP. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1082
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 13:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
I think an underestimated issue with MDs is the psycological effect of the sound. It surrounds you and disorients. The sound FEELs more destructive than it actually is. As people get used to it more it wont be as intimidating. And as your aim assists on your ARs help you ADS on targets under 35m, you will start winning those engagements more often. |
|
|
| |
|