DUST Search - Allow no weapon fitting

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Allow no weapon fitting

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
smartlayer What The French CRONOS. 18	Posted - 2013.08.09 13:26:00 - [1] - Quote a warning is still good to have for new players But it could open up new interesting gameplay by allowing the possibilities to have no weapon -playing a "0 kill char" fully support guy -giving more fitting possibilities for such a role Eventually creating a specific logistic template without light/sidearm slot (flux grenade would be of some help for others) I played a "0 kill" char on planetside 1 and i brought it to BR20, and it was 1-fun to play, very new approch 2-i was very appreciated, was very helpfull, not a parasite (reviving/repairIng everything, scouting/spying/hacking) was even doing ammo support running into gen/cc hold to bring ammo with running max for those who know the game
lrian Locust Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 10	Posted - 2013.08.09 13:30:00 - [2] - Quote I like it. Speedy scout with explosives and hacking equipment can wreak havoc behind enemy lines!
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 220	Posted - 2013.08.09 13:40:00 - [3] - Quote Don't see why not. I also like the idea of a very powerful support dropsuit without any weapons.

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 328	Posted - 2013.08.09 14:48:00 - [4] - Quote Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2413	Posted - 2013.08.09 14:50:00 - [5] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters
Kain Spero Spero Escrow Services 1886	Posted - 2013.08.09 14:55:00 - [6] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters YES please!!!! WTB camera sidearm.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 7100	Posted - 2013.08.09 15:07:00 - [7] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters I'll buy 4k Units, armored.
Meeko Fent Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 548	Posted - 2013.08.09 15:27:00 - [8] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters Being to you live, GAHHUGHUUHGUHUHUHUUHYGHGUUG Stab from the warzone IWTS-53861099
BL4CKST4R WarRavens League of Infamy 1003	Posted - 2013.08.09 15:52:00 - [9] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. What about for LAVs, Tanks, and derpships, would be awesome to remove the small turrets from these vehicles to allow for better fitting options.
Forlorn Destrier Bullet Cluster 1372	Posted - 2013.08.09 15:59:00 - [10] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. The issue is that you are still using PG/CPU, however, for the unused item. The goal is to free that up to use on other items you are attempting to use.

Vin Mora Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. Interstellar Conquest Enterprises 92	Posted - 2013.08.09 17:13:00 - [11] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. If I could fit the repair tool instead of a gun I would.
xSaloLx GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 112	Posted - 2013.08.09 17:47:00 - [12] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Along the same vein. Any hints if you will implement turretless LAVs? Is this what the "chassis" tab in the market will include? Personally, I want something like this: Logistics Chassis: >Removes Turret >Adds 2 seats (total of 4 passengers) >Reduces top speed and acceleration by 5-10% >Increases Shield/Armour (respective for each model) resistance by 5% >Reduces Driver/Passanger hitbox size or something like this.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention 1428	Posted - 2013.08.09 17:56:00 - [13] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. ^This The fittings cost for base level sidearms is very low. The "0 kill" play style is completely accessible under current game mechanics (I've done it in more than one match). There's not much reason to spend Dev time on such a change at this point. 0.02 ISK Cross
Forlorn Destrier Bullet Cluster 1372	Posted - 2013.08.09 17:56:00 - [14] - Quote xSaloLx wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Along the same vein. Any hints if you will implement turretless LAVs? Is this what the "chassis" tab in the market will include? Personally, I want something like this: Logistics Chassis: >Removes Turret >Adds 2 seats (total of 4 passengers) >Reduces top speed and acceleration by 5-10% >Increases Shield/Armour (respective for each model) resistance by 5% >Reduces Driver/Passanger hitbox size or something like this. The ability to fit 2 seats in place of the turret is a great idea!
Lt Royal Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 506	Posted - 2013.08.09 18:44:00 - [15] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters One of the best idea's I read this month!
FLAYLOCK Steve Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 198	Posted - 2013.08.09 19:27:00 - [16] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Spoken like a true logi bro
Cyrius Li-Moody The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 653	Posted - 2013.08.09 19:49:00 - [17] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. Should introduce a 'camera' that goes in the sidearm slot that allows us to take screenshots without the HUD xD Reporters Kitten yes, for the love of all of us who like to edit stuff.
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2424	Posted - 2013.08.09 21:59:00 - [18] - Quote And here I was being sarcastic.
Kain Spero Spero Escrow Services 1923	Posted - 2013.08.12 15:46:00 - [19] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: And here I was being sarcastic. Sometimes that's how it all starts. On the OP topic though I would like to see a fitting only be invalid if you exceed the CPU and PGU.
ALPHA DECRIPTER M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 259	Posted - 2013.08.12 15:57:00 - [20] - Quote I suppose you could just equip std knives... then again that would mean spending extra SP so.... hmmm `Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST.

Galm Fae Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 59	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:09:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Requiring you to equip a weapon does not require that you actually use it in battle (though I recommend that you do generally use it). You are more than free to play a "0 kill" character. I would recommend that if you want to do this, fit only a sidearm with a low resource cost and no primary. Once you spawn, switch to some equipment and go from there. >No Weapon >Nova Knife >I don't see the difference
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3073	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:14:00 - [22] - Quote I think it'd be kind of neat to be able to forgo weapons to leave the maximum amount of fitting possible for equipment and modules. I'm not that good a shot anyway, so I could set my fit up with more Logi gear.
zzZaXxx The Exemplars Top Men. 170	Posted - 2013.08.12 20:10:00 - [23] - Quote Having no weapon at all is ridiculous. Just equip a basic assault scrambler pistol for 15/4.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page