| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
   |
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
remove redlines.
Only 1 of the 5 locations actively shoots at MCC.
Changes randomly at regular intervals.
AKA: Dancing Dom!
There, a new game mode with 1 day of work. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
Maybe terrible idea. Spent whole of 15 seconds thinking of something to post.
YOUR TURN! Describe a new game mode, that is EASY to implement and can be explained in under 3 sentences. |
Zekain Kade
TeamPlayers
EoN.
1408
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
It ain't that simple bro. |
Ploo-Koon
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
138
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Good job! So when will your 1 day of new code be rolled into the release stream? |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die
1632
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sounds a bit like Crash Site from Crysis.
This would be a cool idea, Domination is usually one sided, once a team gets the point, they place Uplinks and REs on the objectives and camp the area until the game is over. Only thing that can possibly change the battle is an OB.
I like this idea because gameplay is not restricted to one part of the map, and you have to change up your tactics depending on where the new objective is. |
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
961
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:remove redlines.
Only 1 of the 5 locations actively shoots at MCC.
Changes randomly at regular intervals.
AKA: Dancing Dom!
There, a new game mode with 1 day of work.
All 5 locations shoot at once, but every consecutive objective held increases the damage done to the MCC by every missile by 50%, so holding all 5 objectives increases damage by 506%! |
Fox Gaden
DUST University
Ivy League
795
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
We have Skirmish 2.0 now.
People are asking to get Skirmish 1.0 back.
Your suggestion would have to be Skirmish 3.0, not 2.0. You need to change the subject line. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ploo-Koon wrote:Good job! So when will your 1 day of new code be rolled into the release stream?
bout a month if everything goes well, typically
:P |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
Zekain Kade wrote:It ain't that simple bro.
No but it's a simple fact that if they don't do something as simple as this instead of constricting the playerbase in less game modes (Ambush+OMS merger) to compensate for fewer players, they will end up getting only fewer and fewer players. Then continue to react in the way that created the problem to begin with.
variety = retention
cutbacks = more players leaking. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:We have Skirmish 2.0 now.
People are asking to get Skirmish 1.0 back.
Your suggestion would have to be Skirmish 3.0, not 2.0. You need to change the subject line.
Figured somebody would bring that up. Didn't care at first but whatever, fine. I'll change it :) |
|
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:38:00 -
[11] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Sounds a bit like Crash Site from Crysis.
This would be a cool idea, Domination is usually one sided, once a team gets the point, they place Uplinks and REs on the objectives and camp the area until the game is over. Only thing that can possibly change the battle is an OB.
I like this idea because gameplay is not restricted to one part of the map, and you have to change up your tactics depending on where the new objective is.
This was the thinking. It's too easy to get comfortable in one location. |
Kinky Burrito
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
174
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Maybe terrible idea. Spent whole of 15 seconds thinking of something to post.
YOUR TURN! Describe a new game mode, that is EASY to implement and can be explained in under 3 sentences.
I can do it in 3 words. CAPTURE THE FLAG.
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1003
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kinky Burrito wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Maybe terrible idea. Spent whole of 15 seconds thinking of something to post.
YOUR TURN! Describe a new game mode, that is EASY to implement and can be explained in under 3 sentences. I can do it in 3 words. CAPTURE THE FLAG.
CCP wouldn't do it unless you could explain it in some quasi-Eve story how that makes sense. They're afraid of looking like an FPS or...something.
So whats the justification for the 'flag' and done! |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
2730
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
Remove red line
Put a 2-way shield around the MCC sand the initial ground spawns- only NULL cannons and MCC fire can shoot through the shield
Remove the ability to spawn on NULL cannons- that's why I only do domination now. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
2730
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Kinky Burrito wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Maybe terrible idea. Spent whole of 15 seconds thinking of something to post.
YOUR TURN! Describe a new game mode, that is EASY to implement and can be explained in under 3 sentences. I can do it in 3 words. CAPTURE THE FLAG. CCP wouldn't do it unless you could explain it in some quasi-Eve story how that makes sense. They're afraid of looking like an FPS or...something. So whats the justification for the 'flag' and done!
Apparently they're making an arena or something like that which allows them to justify unrealistic game modes. As far as non-arena game modes, they couldn't quite do standard capture the flag. However, there could be a game mode where 1 team has to capture an npc MVP. Throw him/her over your shoulder and carry them back to the MCC. |
Roofer Madness
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
117
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
I think a version of capture the flag could be do-able. How about just a 2 point Skirmish where the map is set up with each point on either side, kind of like a "base" with supply depot and CRU. Each team starts at their base already owning the null cannon. Then it plays kind of like ambush but with a point to capture. And in the event of no one capturing the opposing null cannon, the clone count can settle the tie. Hmmmmm? Hmmmmmm?
EDIT: Each base could be in a city. So a map with 2 cities. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
2730
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Roofer Madness wrote:I think a version of capture the flag could be do-able. How about just a 2 point Skirmish where the map is set up with each point on either side, kind of like a "base" with supply depot and CRU. Each team starts at their base already owning the null cannon. Then it plays kind of like ambush but a point to capture. And in the even of no one capturing the opposing null cannon, the clone count can settle the tie. Hmmmmm? Hmmmmmm?
That's just a bad skirmish. |
Roofer Madness
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
117
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Roofer Madness wrote:I think a version of capture the flag could be do-able. How about just a 2 point Skirmish where the map is set up with each point on either side, kind of like a "base" with supply depot and CRU. Each team starts at their base already owning the null cannon. Then it plays kind of like ambush but a point to capture. And in the even of no one capturing the opposing null cannon, the clone count can settle the tie. Hmmmmm? Hmmmmmm? That's just a bad skirmish.
You mean Domination? |
Kinky Burrito
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
175
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 16:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Kinky Burrito wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Maybe terrible idea. Spent whole of 15 seconds thinking of something to post.
YOUR TURN! Describe a new game mode, that is EASY to implement and can be explained in under 3 sentences. I can do it in 3 words. CAPTURE THE FLAG. CCP wouldn't do it unless you could explain it in some quasi-Eve story how that makes sense. They're afraid of looking like an FPS or...something. So whats the justification for the 'flag' and done!
Call it infiltration or espionage. The enemy has space codes or something that you've been hired to steal. Maybe they are security codes for the enemy MCC, and you have to collect it in 3 parts to disable the enemy MCC because there are no null cannons in the district. |
Viktor Zokas
187.
143
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 17:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
Or bring back 1.0, where you sort of do this thing called attacking and defending instead of the circle jerk that is capture the flags. |
|
|
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die
1634
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 17:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
They can make a gamemode like Warhawk's 'Zones' mode.
http://warhawk.wikia.com/wiki/Zones_ |
Kinky Burrito
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
175
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 17:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
Viktor Zokas wrote:Or bring back 1.0, where you sort of do this thing called attacking and defending instead of the circle jerk that is capture the flags.
You are right. Who wants multiple game modes? That gets boring. Playing the same thing over and over is where the fun is at. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |