DUST Search - sign to agree that PvE should now be priority content

steadyhand amarr wrote:

So never done this before but if I'm picking on the general gossip right there is a big demand for this. Show your support and maybe the right people will get the message.

note: You can fix up the game and give us pve at the same time the two tasks require diffrent people to do :-)
update1 iv put a small tag next your names along with those that were maybes and disagrees to try and keep this balanced and fair and stop my own wants bleeding though, if i got anyone wrong just tell me :)

Signed

yes
Steadyhand amarr
Protocake JR (wants more things to do)
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf(wants more things to do)
martinofski(bored)
Poplo Furuya(bored wants PvE to be hard )
XeroTheBigBoss(welcome change of pace)
RoundEy3(somthing else to do)
Fox Gaden(fall expansion)
RINON114

undecided

Kiiran-B(feels core fixes still need to go in first)

no
N1ck Comeau(core fixes first then PvE)
ReGnYuM(beucase he is a scrub....for reals wants PvP fixed first)
TheD1CK(wants to see it but PvP comes first)
Mobius Wyvern(behind PvP no faith in development team to produce both at the same time

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
steadyhand amarr Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 1061	Posted - 2013.08.12 09:36:00 - [31] - Quote Soda I take it ur a no then :-P lol. Also im quite sure both could be developed at the same time. Most of pve development is AI path finding the rest it shares with PvP and both can use the same assests. Frankly saying pve should not be in the game is very self centred attertude to have as there are plenty of people who get more enjoyment out of pve content then getting facerolled by you in PvP
Rusty Shallows Black Jackals 253	Posted - 2013.08.12 09:39:00 - [32] - Quote Signed. PvE to shake things up and try out fits that would otherwise never be used. I feel the KDR pressure in regular matches. Variations of PvP wouldn't be bad either espeically if there was a Merc Contract style game where only a squad goes in on a structured mission and everyone else gets to play starter fits without KDR consequences.
SoTah Pawp Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 600	Posted - 2013.08.12 09:47:00 - [33] - Quote steadyhand amarr wrote: Soda I take it ur a no then :-P lol. Also im quite sure both could be developed at the same time. Most of pve development is AI path finding the rest it shares with PvP and both can use the same assests. Frankly saying pve should not be in the game is very self centred attertude to have as there are plenty of people who get more enjoyment out of pve content then getting facerolled by you in PvP Not saying it shouldn't be added. I'll just call those who use it and not PvP scrubs until they quit, is all.
KingBabar Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback 1045	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:01:00 - [34] - Quote PVE? There are tons of much better games out there that lets me shoot at zombies, nazies or whatnot. Leave PVE for the AAA-games. Dust barely has a playerbase as it is, splitting it up even further is not a good idea. I don't see any reason for Dust having PVE at all, who would want to shoot at some pre-programmed bots when we have real people to shoot at? It doesn't make any sense to me.
steadyhand amarr Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 1061	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:02:00 - [35] - Quote So like every other game ya dam troll :-P:-P
steadyhand amarr Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 1061	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:05:00 - [36] - Quote KingBabar wrote: PVE? There are tons of much better games out there that lets me shoot at zombies, nazies or whatnot. Leave PVE for the AAA-games. Dust barely has a playerbase as it is, splitting it up even further is not a good idea. I don't see any reason for Dust having PVE at all, who would want to shoot at some pre-programmed bots when we have real people to shoot at? It doesn't make any sense to me. Me I would rather rather shoot robots than help boost your ego pve would help the playerbase grow as well thus eliminating your point. Global agenda is a perfect example of it done right
SoTah Pawp Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 600	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:07:00 - [37] - Quote steadyhand amarr wrote: KingBabar wrote: PVE? There are tons of much better games out there that lets me shoot at zombies, nazies or whatnot. Leave PVE for the AAA-games. Dust barely has a playerbase as it is, splitting it up even further is not a good idea. I don't see any reason for Dust having PVE at all, who would want to shoot at some pre-programmed bots when we have real people to shoot at? It doesn't make any sense to me. Me I would rather rather shoot robots than help boost your ego pve would help the playerbase grow as well thus eliminating your point. Global agenda is a perfect example of it done right You didn't even touch upon his real point - that dividing the playerbase even further is a bad idea. And be honest - do you have faith that CCP would make PvE fun? Look at our maps and game modes - do you really believe they could?
Khal V'Rani Nephilim Initiative 249	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:11:00 - [38] - Quote Signed Just as long as the core gets fixed too.
Zeylon Rho Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1833	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:28:00 - [39] - Quote "Dividing the player base" is an asinine argument against more content. Imagine any game with a very limited set of gameplay options (an MMO with 3 quests and 2 areas, etc.). People will stop playing with nothing else to do... Because it gets boring. Say the MMO has some kinks in combat, would it make sense to not add any new elements to gameplay because you're concerned that the area populations will drop? Fixes are good of course, but balance and tightening is a lifelong process for an MMO. The biggest issue here is a lack of meaningful dialog on it. New ways to play and interact are what will ultimately get people playing more, as you can only run the capture/deathmatch modes so many times. pve with human, animal, or robot opponents is ideal, but even mining, market play, and mini games would be... Something. I'd rather decorate my quarters and design the ideal living space for a few hours (Animal Crossing: New Eden) than play another round of the same ole... And I hate decorating.
Adiran Zanzalin DUST University Ivy League 1	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:33:00 - [40] - Quote Yes! In my opinion it never should of launched without it. Waiting for PVE to see if ill stick with this game like I did with eve back when I had money to play that.

Vrain Matari ZionTCD 676	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:34:00 - [41] - Quote Not yet. It's the kind of thing I would expect CCP Shanghai to do, actually. The foundations are rotten and the structure is beginning to crumble. Fix the core before the whole thing goes down. Then yes, PvE and new modes.
Sgt Kirk SyNergy Gaming EoN. 1039	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:35:00 - [42] - Quote I need more **** to do dammit
steadyhand amarr Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 1061	Posted - 2013.08.12 10:38:00 - [43] - Quote SoTah Pawp wrote: steadyhand amarr wrote: KingBabar wrote: PVE? There are tons of much better games out there that lets me shoot at zombies, nazies or whatnot. Leave PVE for the AAA-games. Dust barely has a playerbase as it is, splitting it up even further is not a good idea. I don't see any reason for Dust having PVE at all, who would want to shoot at some pre-programmed bots when we have real people to shoot at? It doesn't make any sense to me. Me I would rather rather shoot robots than help boost your ego pve would help the playerbase grow as well thus eliminating your point. Global agenda is a perfect example of it done right You didn't even touch upon his real point - that dividing the playerbase even further is a bad idea. And be honest - do you have faith that CCP would make PvE fun? Look at our maps and game modes - do you really believe they could? Don't use leading statmemts. It's a clear trick to make someone's mind up in order to match the tone of the question. Lawyers get told off all the time for doing it :-P:-P Splitting up the playerbase is a **** argument as creating diffrent gamemodes for PvP would cause exeatly the same problem. Also I hAbe no faith in their ablitly to give me good PvP content but PvE is untested so worth a shot. Also saying you don't have faith in the company is again a needless point to make as under that argument we might as well give dust to another studio as we can't trust the dev's to give us any content weather it's PvP or pve
KingBabar Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback 1047	Posted - 2013.08.12 13:20:00 - [44] - Quote Something as simple as re-introducing Skirmish 1.0, or bring some sort of "tactical gamemode" would come a long way. Now we only have "kill all the reddots" or "keep those letters blue", I have never played any FPS which doesn't have tactical game modes being way "more tactical" than we currently have in Dust. Besides the various core mechanics this is the most important part IMO. With "proper" gamemodes I think we can keep a lot of players and perhaps even bring back some of the FPS veterans that have left.
THEDRiZZLE Aqua teen Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback 65	Posted - 2013.08.12 13:22:00 - [45] - Quote Hit detection and lag first
Jason Pearson Seraphim Auxiliaries 2445	Posted - 2013.08.12 13:23:00 - [46] - Quote PvE needs to come, right after the balancing. The next few patches should focus on making the PvP more enjoyable. Once PvE comes out our PvP needs to be perfect as the Drones will be balanced around the weapons of that area. PvE would be a great way to integrate DUST with EVE, and not just with terrible Orbitals, check mah Signature for the thread :D King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here!
Heimdallr69 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 508	Posted - 2013.08.12 13:24:00 - [47] - Quote steadyhand amarr wrote: So never done this before but if I'm picking on the general gossip right there is a big demand for this. Show your support and maybe the right people will get the message. note: You can fix up the game and give us pve at the same time the two tasks require diffrent people to do :-) update1 iv put a small tag next your names along with those that were maybes and disagrees to try and keep this balanced and fair and stop my own wants bleeding though, if i got anyone wrong just tell me :) Signed yes Steadyhand amarr Protocake JR (wants more things to do) KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf(wants more things to do) martinofski(bored) Poplo Furuya(bored wants PvE to be hard ) XeroTheBigBoss(welcome change of pace) RoundEy3(somthing else to do) Fox Gaden(fall expansion) RINON114 undecided Kiiran-B(feels core fixes still need to go in first) no N1ck Comeau(core fixes first then PvE) ReGnYuM(beucase he is a scrub....for reals wants PvP fixed first) TheD1CK(wants to see it but PvP comes first) Mobius Wyvern(behind PvP no faith in development team to produce both at the same time Hell yeahh give me something to do after I cap
steadyhand amarr Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance 1064	Posted - 2013.08.12 18:15:00 - [48] - Quote updated with todays names :)
SteelDark Knight Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 87	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:30:00 - [49] - Quote Yes, first because I want a change of pace. Second, because it is the optimal way to make a beneficial change to the new player experience and tutorial.
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 2486	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:31:00 - [50] - Quote Signed.

Lillica Deathdealer Mango and Friends 89	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:32:00 - [51] - Quote HEY HEY! put me down for SIGNED!
Tallen Ellecon KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 471	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:34:00 - [52] - Quote +1 A trillion times yes to PVE.
Himiko Kuronaga SyNergy Gaming EoN. 1213	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:36:00 - [53] - Quote No. Why? Because AI design is a difficult thing that takes extended effort to get right. CCP does not put extended effort into any one feature, ever. So in reality, this would be a wasted feature.
Tectonic Fusion The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 120	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:37:00 - [54] - Quote SIGNED ADD ME IN!
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders 497	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:38:00 - [55] - Quote I want PvE but I want a better New Player Experience more, so no, I'd rather get tutorials, academy to be fixed, and Core Fixes.
Halador Osiris Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 578	Posted - 2013.08.12 19:39:00 - [56] - Quote Signed.
Necandi Brasil Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention 270	Posted - 2013.08.12 20:10:00 - [57] - Quote Signed. But, I know why they don't want to make PvE now... Low player count.... so Players in PvP would be left alone :(
Buster Friently Rosen Association 1589	Posted - 2013.08.12 20:11:00 - [58] - Quote Signed. It should have been a priority a long time ago.
KEQ Harbinger Elements Of Death Elite 31	Posted - 2013.08.12 20:20:00 - [59] - Quote No, fixing Dust's core issues, like movement speed (easy fix), death taxis, etc... are highest priority.
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3080	Posted - 2013.08.12 20:28:00 - [60] - Quote Yeah, I'll give this a Sign.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page