| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
321. Remove WP Requirement for EVE Bombardments - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
I'm in agreement with, Burseg here... Why would dust bunnies be shooting eve ships down? This is a job for other eve ships, I go back to my previous argument, relevancy of having eve side support, implementing timer based OB's incentivize eve side...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 19:29:00
|
322. Chat Channel for Mercs to help with PC - in The War Room [original thread]
There's lots of channels that work, lfsquad has quite a few good mercs in it that squad up.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 17:37:00
|
323. Spectator Mode for PC!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or just have a new piece of equipment, the go pro camera that records you battles ;) Seriously though, either a 5 min delay or maybe PC battles are recorded and sent to the corp CEO so they can do after action reviews.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 17:33:00
|
324. Remove WP Requirement for EVE Bombardments - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The answer for this is not now. Later. So there is a plan in the works then? Thanks for the reply.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 17:23:00
|
325. Remove WP Requirement for EVE Bombardments - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
This needs to happen... It gives a relevancy to having eve side support... Right now dust players aren't worried about how much eve side support another alliance has and that's just wrong, the eve support factor should play a huge role in this g...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 17:10:00
|
326. Spectator Mode for PC!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Great idea... However, I think you should only be able to spectate your own corp or alliance corps if you're in one. Since only 16 can play, at least this way the rest of your peeps can watch the battle.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 16:56:00
|
327. The Federation of Small Corperations - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
Sakari Wakuu wrote: xLTShinySidesx wrote: Still looking for active corps, new and old Well ours has expressed its interest about 3 times already, can you please respond? Contact Sakari Wakuu (DUST 514), CompactDisc7227 or Sakari Kuvakei (...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 15:41:00
|
328. dust 514 is dum - in General Discussions [original thread]
0/10
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 02:14:00
|
329. CALLING ALL SMALLER CORPORATIONS!! - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
Shyeer Alvarin wrote: We fully intend to, yes. We have put several operations in high-gear. We are treating Faction Warfare as PC training. Cool, good luck to you guys, I hope you make an impact!
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 01:00:00
|
330. The Federation of Small Corperations - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
Still looking for active corps, new and old
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 00:58:00
|
331. The Active Scanner. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaze Eyrou wrote: 8-10 WP for a scanned enemy getting killed is in the works. A Dev posted in another forum; don't have the link at the moment though. Can someone post the one I'm thinking of? 10 seems fair.... Assuming every clone killed ...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 00:37:00
|
332. CALLING ALL SMALLER CORPORATIONS!! - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
I like that you guys are doing this, if you need any support from the FSC, let me know... Always glad to give some help/tips if you need, we started with 1 corp and got over 20 in just over a month. You guys running PC?
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 00:25:00
|
333. So the imps - in The War Room [original thread]
ShwerShwerShwer wrote: Is this an open invite? I want in Of course, I'll grab you if you're on
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.16 00:06:00
|
334. So the imps - in The War Room [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: xLTShinySidesx wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Rhorian Darkstar wrote: Severance Pay wrote: They assumed that other corps and alliances would rally behind them. It would take a lot of grief from negative-feedback for ev...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 22:50:00
|
335. So the imps - in The War Room [original thread]
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: xLTShinySidesx wrote: Come squad up with us sometime and judge for yourself :) No need, you are bad. But its okay we forgive you. If you say so :)
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 22:44:00
|
336. So the imps - in The War Room [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Rhorian Darkstar wrote: Severance Pay wrote: They assumed that other corps and alliances would rally behind them. It would take a lot of grief from negative-feedback for every corp to get in on it. Truth is that they ar...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 22:32:00
|
337. The Active Scanner. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I haven't used one yet but I imagine they work wonders for orbital placement.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 20:51:00
|
338. There are a few fixes that squads still need. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squad orders are broken as well... If a team member is to far away I can't assign orders and most of the time it will show my team mate in the wrong location altogether, it doesn't fix where my squad member is until I get close and then his positi...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 19:45:00
|
339. War report #1 - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Sponglyboy Squaredoo wrote: Orin the Freak wrote: Sponglyboy Squaredoo wrote: What everyone needs to realize is that this game isn't meant to have "small" corps. The capacity is in the thousands for a reason. The fact tha...
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 17:17:00
|
340. Skill Point Respec - Quick questions for the Devs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go read the announcements page, there's a thread dedicated to it.
- by xLTShinySidesx - at 2013.05.15 16:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |