Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
201. ScR and RR - in General Discussions [original thread]
No.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.19 21:04:00
|
202. Doubling TTK - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Irritated. People complaining this is a twitch shooter with instant TTK have no idea what they're talking about. TTK is actually pretty long here, generally. The people who would benefit most from a TTK increase would ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.19 20:53:00
|
203. Doubling TTK - in General Discussions [original thread]
PLAYSTTION wrote: Would like to try. CCP could try this for a week then have us tell them what we thought, who knows. Getting rid of aim assist would almost double TTK and reward real skill. If we get rid of hit detection Kb/m needs to be re...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.19 20:45:00
|
204. Doubling TTK - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: That said, lower TTK gameplay requires more skill. People asking for higher TTK, are going to get tore up, just as badly as they are now, for the fundamental reason that the people killing them, can and will acquire lethal fi...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.19 20:37:00
|
205. Discussion: Shield vs Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: 1. It is a slippery slope to state that it isn't a negative that it requires more SP because "I put X amount of SP into Y thing therefore I'm entitled to Z." I was merely showing that, yes, it does require more SP. This ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.17 21:52:00
|
206. I just realized... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Snooty voice-"Oh my poor fools. There is no gravity in dust 514, everything falls at a constant rate rather than a constant acceleration. How can we modify a value that simply does not exist?"
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.17 21:01:00
|
207. Discussion: Shield vs Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: 1. "Getting the most out of Shields is not about stacking EHP but about regenerating quickly." -Problem: This also requires more modules and more SP than Armor. The argument is about making Shields work as effectively a...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.17 20:59:00
|
208. Serious Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Even if you gave Logistics the same slot layout as Assaults and gave them 100 more base HP, they would still have less HP than an Assault; that's how large the difference is between the suits currently. The logi suits do...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.17 04:47:00
|
209. Min Assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
All the assaults are fine, except for the Min assault. It's because it doesn't sacrifice enough hp for the amount of speed buffs, and stamina regeneration buffs that it gets. The reason everyone is using it is because it has the best stats, it's n...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.17 04:38:00
|
210. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: gustavo acosta the contradictory grammar police wrote: idiot, fool, illiterate, ignaramus im done, u contradict urself in every second sentence, have a nice day sir. Good you're awful at writing...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.16 18:05:00
|
211. (Video) 5 Myrofibril Caldari Assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ayy I thought dat EHP was 300 on a myrofibril stacked suit what's these hacks?
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.16 03:37:00
|
212. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
WeapondigitX V7 wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: I've never seen a mass driver steal any cover, ever. Seriously though people still think that myofibrlis sacrifice HP? Lol armor tanking is just more rampant on shield suits. Armor tanking ju...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.16 02:59:00
|
213. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: jordy mack wrote: ok i give up, u guys seem to just wana argue for no real reason and ignore any counter argument anyone presents, so have a nice day. It's not "no real reason" it's for the igno...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.16 02:14:00
|
214. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: ok i give up, u guys seem to just wana argue for no real reason and ignore any counter argument anyone presents, so have a nice day. It's not "no real reason" it's for the ignorant masses who think that jump mods are fine ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 23:46:00
|
215. What is the most irritating topic to discuss to you on the forums? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Discussing which topic discussed is most irritating, is the most irritating.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 18:32:00
|
216. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
[quote=Pagl1u M WTF? Do you really have to skill into it to undersant how to counter them? Try shooting to them... [/quote] Shooting jumpers isn't a hard counter because they can just avoid fire by jumping. Not to mention they can still have a dec...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 18:28:00
|
217. This Is Why KDR Matters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Summa Militum wrote: One Eyed King wrote: Except for the fact that a majority of MCC based games like Domination and Skirmish are rarely won via clone count. Not to mention that Duna has an incredibly high KDR, which by your logic should eq...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 17:50:00
|
218. killing proto tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Mejt0 wrote: It's funny how madrugar can out rep railgun dps Some math. Proto railgun has a refire rate of 2.1 seconds and 1885 damage. with 109% damage bonus on armor (taken from in-game observations) that damage ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 17:49:00
|
219. Myros + jump vs Tank + strafe - in General Discussions [original thread]
500+ ehp is hardly a loss of shields, not to mention MDs, PLC's, and flaylocks don't need them... That's like saying "My gun one shots every suit in the game, but when I sit down to use it I eventually get uncomfortable and have to readjust mysel...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 17:43:00
|
220. Cover for me but no cover for thee! - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: so which one is it are bouncey md's easy mode, or do they not have enuff splash? im confused. also no, a stationary target behind cover aagainst my md is only worse for them, they would be better off charging at me head on ac...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.15 17:37:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |