Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2041. Has anyone seen it? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AFAIK there is a quafe variant of every basic light and heavy weapon now. It should get interesting for the dummies like me that can not stop dropping money into strong boxes and have a massive collection now. Strangely enough I have ended up wi...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 20:12:00
|
2042. To all the big spenders out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Akamandon wrote: Oh and just checked, they don't have blueprints for every weapon in the game. Yes there are some missing. No I would not recommend buying any BPO light weapons as you will be much better off waiting until the quafe ones fr...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 20:08:00
|
2043. To all the big spenders out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sicerly Yaw wrote: I am sitting on 140k AUR right now I have absolutely no idea what to spend it on I already have 2 BPO scouts and and an assault I want to get some light weapon BPO's and the sidearms too but the only way I know to get them is...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 20:06:00
|
2044. so I've been watching some YouTube videos and came across - in General Discussions [original thread]
They failed by trying to have that discussion with out mentioning Spreadsheets in Space aka Eve Online.
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 20:03:00
|
2045. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kevall Longstride wrote: Kain Spero wrote: I have to agree with deezy here that NPC strikes largely need to go, but I would suggest keeping the flux strikes due to the high ground camping with links meta. I'm sorry but without the scaling...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:49:00
|
2046. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: I have to agree with deezy here that NPC strikes largely need to go, but I would suggest keeping the flux strikes due to the high ground camping with links meta. I could take it or leave it on that. Eve is able to provide f...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:40:00
|
2047. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kevall Longstride wrote: Actually there are NPC OB still in Faction Warfare costing WP which is what confused me earlier. They were returned with the reduced WP costs back in Uprising 1.10 I think it was. If you want Platoon deploy in FW thes...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:30:00
|
2048. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Deezy you've already agreed that FW syncs are already in the system. There is no "breaking the system more" unless you are referring to solo players that shouldn't be in the system anyways and if they are they've taken the ris...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:27:00
|
2049. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
demens grimwulff wrote: deezy dabest wrote: demens grimwulff wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Everyone arguing for this is consistently avoiding my example of how it shuts out the player base from FW. I wonder why that is? Not at all, ...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:15:00
|
2050. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
demens grimwulff wrote: deezy dabest wrote: What about a 4 or 5 man squad that would get totally shut out? Are they meant to have longer times just because they did not fill up to 16? You claim they will fill in the holes. How would they f...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:12:00
|
2051. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
demens grimwulff wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Everyone arguing for this is consistently avoiding my example of how it shuts out the player base from FW. I wonder why that is? Not at all, I am just unable to see how it would. The game mod...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:07:00
|
2052. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dust User wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Do you seriously want all of FW to be controlled by a few FCs in a few channels? If so I will gladly revive AmarrOne and show all of you exactly how to block anyone from playing if they do not want to fo...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:05:00
|
2053. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: The simple fact is that disallowing full team deploy does nothing but harm those that aren't the well connected in FW. Again the simple fact remains that more syncs equal more good fights. Public matches are being designed to...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 19:03:00
|
2054. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everyone arguing for this is consistently avoiding my example of how it shuts out the player base from FW. I wonder why that is?
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:54:00
|
2055. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Again, Deezy, you aren't seeing the big picture here. Would you not agree that we already have 16 man syncs in FW? Those syncs ARE what's limited to the choosen few that know about faction warfare channels like PIE Ground Con...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:50:00
|
2056. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Deezy you are straight wrong. With platoons in Fw you eliminate the need of being forced to sync by voice in a player created channel. You create a platoon, voice there, and deploy. The more you talk it seems more likely you ...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:33:00
|
2057. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
demens grimwulff wrote: I am in agreement here... team deploy for PC only is silly. Faction warfare q-syncs are a real thing, and with channels popping up daily, FW has started to be reborn, with more and more players in it every day. This game...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:27:00
|
2058. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Deezy, again you already have 16 man groups able to deploy. CCP coded in a workaround to make it happen long ago. Why do you want to keep others from going against the already established q-syncs? I would LOVE to see 16 pe...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:18:00
|
2059. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: All I see are people posting the extreme negatives on both sides. While I see the negatives in platoon syncs in FW it will ultimately improve the organization of serious players looking for a fight or those starter corps l...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:10:00
|
2060. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Kain Spero wrote: Look when it comes to team deploy in FW (low sec) this is what needs to be said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuHfVn_cfHU If they "DO IT" I will gladly pillage FW in exactl...
- by deezy dabest - at 2015.06.29 18:03:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |