| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
6241. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Meh, my Press Secretary has been slipping lately. I'll smack that hoe shortly. And I thought CUBS abused his secretary
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:25:00
|
6242. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: I could have sworn I've seen you say this at least once back in 1.6 before Spkr put his version in his signature. I think I did, but I'm terrible a memorizing things.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:24:00
|
6243. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Press Secretary wrote: This poster is now under investigation for stealing popular players signatures. I already supply Spkr4TheDead with royalties on the signature. Every-time I use it, I pay him 1 ISK
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:13:00
|
6244. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: LOL, Atiim wants to pretend that he spent SP on multiple things, but that no one else does. Spawn in as a logi, bring links and hives, throw your useless corpse off the rooftop and spawn with the forge. One man in ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:11:00
|
6245. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Atiim wrote: NK Scout wrote: Darken Sol wrote: htfu Then htfu about tanks As soon as you htfu about Jihad Jeeps and Remote Explosives. I was replying to him unserious I treat AVers like I do family. You go after ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:08:00
|
6246. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Darken Sol wrote: htfu Then htfu about tanks As soon as you htfu about Jihad Jeeps and Remote Explosives.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:06:00
|
6247. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: I believe he meant the total cost of suits expired, not the cost of a singular one. Nope. One single suit costs me about 2-215k ISK.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:05:00
|
6248. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Teamwork For Thee, But No Teamwork For Me -Such is the motto of Vehicle Pilots
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:04:00
|
6249. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Atiim wrote: NK Scout wrote: I use a forge gun And I meant whose fault is that for using 200k suits? You never did answer that question when I asked you who's fault it is for using 1-2mil ISK HAVs or ADSs back in 1.6, s...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 22:01:00
|
6250. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Joel II X wrote: No. Just... Stop... Then stop abusing the remotes the way they werent intended *Talks about abusing game mechanics* *Drives HAV*
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:59:00
|
6251. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Lol Atiim what do you use on a 200k suit? I'm not at home, so I can't give you my exact fitting.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:58:00
|
6252. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: I use a forge gun And I meant whose fault is that for using 200k suits? You never did answer that question when I asked you who's fault it is for using 1-2mil ISK HAVs or ADSs back in 1.6, so I see no reason as to why I shoul...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:56:00
|
6253. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
@NK Scout It cannot be used for contact grenading because of it's arm times. In order for it to be a contact grenade, it would have to: Explode on contact.
Explode without user interference
The only explosive that could possibly be cons...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:54:00
|
6254. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Atiim wrote: If CCP cares about the playerbase, AV will be receiving a respec along with the rest of the Infantry based skill trees in 1.8. But yes, it really does suck loosing so many suits just for a measly 80k. Especially...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:52:00
|
6255. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
If CCP cares about the playerbase, AV will be receiving a respec along with the rest of the Infantry based skill trees in 1.8. But yes, it really does suck loosing so many suits just for a measly 80k. Especially when your suit costs 200k. That's...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:45:00
|
6256. The problem with tanks is that they're too damn strong without r... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Kitty, why are you using explosives against a Caldari HAV? Even if those AV nades were Allotek Fluxes the result wouldn't have been any different. He would have activ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:34:00
|
6257. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only valid idea that you suggested was to patch the bug that allows for people to detonate remotes before they are terminated. As for everything else... NK Scout wrote: Increase the time it takes to arm the remote by 1 second or 2. No. ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:25:00
|
6258. The problem with tanks is that they're too damn strong without r... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Kitty, why are you using explosives against a Caldari HAV? Why do railguns get to destroy Armored HAVs? What are SCRs allowed to destroy Galente suits? Why can a Combat Rifle kill a Caldari suit?
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:06:00
|
6259. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Whats fair amd balanced setting? Where one MLT tank requires 2-3proto forges in a high up position, with infantry protection? They don't need infantry protection up high, and 3 forges will ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 21:02:00
|
6260. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: You forgot option 3. Tanks aren't OP in a fair and balanced setting, but random pub players suck at countering them, so they look far more OP than any infantry options because those can be more effectively countered 1...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.13 20:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |