| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. REQUEST REMOVE RAILGUN INSTALLATIONS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CrotchGrab 360 wrote: They have NO place in this game!! All they do is destroy my tank from halfway across the ******* map. Who thought it would be a good idea to have so many of them too? they're EVERYWHERE Only player actions should be abl...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.12.26 17:39:00
|
2. [Request] MCC command (mostly used for planetary conquest) (WIP) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: aden slayer wrote: Most of you who play Skirmish know that the MCCs are mostly just staying in mid-air waiting to be destroy by the other. But in the near future Corps will be able buy their own MCC. so here is a list of...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.03.21 01:50:00
|
3. [Request] MCC command (mostly used for planetary conquest) (WIP) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Terry Webber wrote: I agree with a lot of things on OP's idea except for the WP requirements for the abilities. Having a cooldown is good enough for me. WPs for abilities are needed for balancing. I don't think we should be able to use them ...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.03.20 16:09:00
|
4. [Request] MCC command (mostly used for planetary conquest) (WIP) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: I do say yes to minor rewards like these in the form of fitted modules. Pilot and gunner(s) will have to cooperate to really get work done. In my opinion the best comparison is the gunship in the bf3 dlc but it should mainta...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.03.20 09:02:00
|
5. [Request] MCC command (mostly used for planetary conquest) (WIP) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: +1 any ideas to add?
- by aden slayer - at 2013.03.20 04:10:00
|
6. [Request] MCC command (mostly used for planetary conquest) (WIP) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Most of you who play Skirmish know that the MCCs are mostly just staying in mid-air waiting to be destroy by the other. But in the near future Corps will be able buy their own MCC. so here is a list of ideas of what the MCC should do. One player...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.03.19 17:34:00
|
7. [Request] It would be so cool if there was a jet pack. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
cool but it would be OP.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.02.24 04:40:00
|
8. Dear CCP, a growing concern from a "bitter beta vet" - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A delayed update is better than a broken update. Let CCP take their time.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.02.18 04:38:00
|
9. [Request] Immersion: part 2 (out of battle, movement, lighting, etc.) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 But features like this will take time.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.02.16 09:26:00
|
10. [Request] The return of the original skirmish mode as a new Gametype called &quo... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Huh? I thought this thread died. Thanks to who ever bumped it.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.02.13 11:37:00
|
11. When defeated allow downed players to look around - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You are injured, you are not suppose to move at all.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.01.30 05:50:00
|
12. I just hope you won't go to the Open Beta with this build because - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Konohamaru Sarutobi wrote: aden slayer wrote: matchmaking is being fixed and tweaked. patience is a virtue....... I have patience. I'm not hurry about the game relase. I just think an Open Beta is supose to "keep testing" and "attract pl...
- by aden slayer - at 2013.01.06 05:18:00
|
13. I just hope you won't go to the Open Beta with this build because - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
matchmaking is being fixed and tweaked. patience is a virtue.......
- by aden slayer - at 2013.01.06 05:10:00
|
14. The player balancing on this game is complete and utter garbage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Butthurt! Butthurt in the forums!
- by aden slayer - at 2013.01.06 04:35:00
|
15. Prometheus Pro . . . - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Another wasted thread.
- by aden slayer - at 2013.01.03 13:18:00
|
16. [Idea] Rumble Drugs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Smoking crack in dust? LOL no.
- by aden slayer - at 2012.12.26 07:40:00
|
17. [Request] The return of the original skirmish mode as a new Gametype called &quo... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ivar Iosef wrote: That's what happened near the end of the build, after they were mucking with some of the mechanics and turret placements. Heavies would roll up and wipe out the first 2 objectives, thus shortening the match so the Defenders co...
- by aden slayer - at 2012.12.21 10:41:00
|
18. [Request] The return of the original skirmish mode as a new Gametype called &quo... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Grimmiers wrote: If that mode is brought back I think the map would have to be bigger. At least one of the objectives you hack/destroy need to be indoors, or at a high elevation. Before both objectives were destroyed pretty quickly most of the ...
- by aden slayer - at 2012.12.21 03:15:00
|
19. [Request] The return of the original skirmish mode as a new Gametype called &quo... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Hey guys... new idea. Don't just bring the old mode back, renovate it... First stage is the current Skirmish. When one team's MCC is destroyed, the other team become the "attackers" and can push forwards if their MCC ...
- by aden slayer - at 2012.12.21 01:13:00
|
20. [Request] The return of the original skirmish mode as a new Gametype called &quo... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Oh yeah I forgot If anyone wants more info on the early build just post the question and someone will reply.
- by aden slayer - at 2012.12.20 16:53:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |