| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
141. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: CPM Zatara wrote: Scouts were fine before 1.8. I raged. Dust Forums, how I love thee. Where was this said? Saying that scouts were more useful to the competitive scene in 1.7 than assaults/logi's are in 1.8...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:58:00
|
142. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: dwater wrote: Thumb Green wrote: He probably did, but it seems he doesn't really care. Just seems to be trying to find supporters for what he wants pushed through. Oh look at that my tard detector started going off ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:44:00
|
143. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: But he's right, assault damage output is fine, if the problem are heavies HP why not just nerf heavies HP or resistances? You say damage output is fine...and it is..in pubs. But in PC assaults have no place on the battle...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:39:00
|
144. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
John ShepardIII wrote: Cargo Hub Well I am excited to see this. PC match later you'll be on?
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:35:00
|
145. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
John ShepardIII wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: John ShepardIII wrote: I use a duvolle TAC and I've 1v1d a lot of heavies just takes about 2 clips Sure, so have I. They were bad heavies. Got a capture card? You should fight a PC match in...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:32:00
|
146. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
John ShepardIII wrote: I use a duvolle TAC and I've 1v1d a lot of heavies just takes about 2 clips Sure, so have I. They were bad heavies. Got a capture card? You should fight a PC match in an assault suit with a tac. See how that goes in ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:27:00
|
147. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
John ShepardIII wrote: The Telling Truth wrote: Damage buff would make assaults more viable against heavies 300 ehp? What's the average current average hp of a proto commando now? Being a commando would be cool in theory if I had a signifi...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:18:00
|
148. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: Which also enhances their CQC capabilities. I said it before and I'll say it every damn time; if the Caldari are going to get a bonus that allows them to perform better in CQC then the Gallente will have to get a bonus that ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 18:01:00
|
149. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Majority support for assaults to have the commando bonus. [/b] Did you even read the replies to this thread? The people who want the Commando's bonus to stay out number Assaults 13-7. I count 7 for as...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 17:54:00
|
150. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: - Yes please give logis more speed. Hard to rep people or give them ammo when I can't keep up *sigh* - Please don't mess with the Amarr assault bonus, it's perfect. Giving it the commando bonus would be a big nerf to t...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 06:03:00
|
151. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Then you run into an issue with Assaults and Commandos stepping on each-others toes, that and the fact that 5% is akin to an Enhanced Damage Mod, which is very easy to fit and not very noteworthy. Personally I think that suit bon...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 05:05:00
|
152. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cass Caul wrote: -snip- yes I totally support you needing 3 damps to get under lol gal logi focused scans. not 4 damps. that was part of what was dumb in 1.7. dunno why that was ever unclear. but that'd 3 damps...no dampening from cloa...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:05:00
|
153. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Imagine 50% reload speed....just you lose 10% damage in that first clip...but sustained DPS goes WAAAY up. I use min mando and I salivate at having 50% reload speed...it's already very fast. Or you coul...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:37:00
|
154. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
hfderrtgvcd wrote: Let commandos keep the damage bonus, but give assaults a bonus to rof. it sounds solid in your mind bud...but no. trust me.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:35:00
|
155. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Booby Tuesdays wrote: Leave the Assault Damage bonus to Legion. Keep the Commando damage bonus for Dust. I specced Commando for the sole purpose of it being a badass AV fit. Throwing only more HP at it makes it a true heavy frame scrub fit imho...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:31:00
|
156. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: That's what i'm asking you. I suggested them getting 1.5x the ehp, a grenade, and more stamina. But I don't know what might be an appropriate bonus to replace the damage bonus. Commando are s...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:29:00
|
157. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: True Adamance wrote: Commando's do not need more EHP. If people genuinely believe they do they are whining sods who can't ******* handle their role correctly. What would you prefer they get...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:18:00
|
158. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: After checking out some fits it would appear as if I was wrong. Currently my MinAssault can only gain an extra 21HP than the Commando if I dedicate both fits to pure eHP. However my other points still stand firm. You don't even n...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:17:00
|
159. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Commando's do not need more EHP. If people genuinely believe they do they are whining sods who can't ******* handle their role correctly. What would you prefer they get if the assaults were given the damage bonus? ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:14:00
|
160. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: If you gave Assaults the 10% Damage Increase then they would completely make the Commando class irrelevant over-night As they'd be able to have: Better eHP (even with the proposed +300 eHP Increase)
Can you elaborate on...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |