Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
1421. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
PonyClause Rex wrote: Planetside2onPS4 wrote: Video of OP's concerns The tracer fire and lazors at night time look simply divine and to die for Such a lousy game IMO.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.22 13:05:00
|
1422. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
You're dumb. *spoiler*Don't look at his video's. He just spams Planetside2, which is a really bad game.*spoiler*
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.22 12:44:00
|
1423. CCP, respond us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hellsatano wrote: up As an American, +1.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.21 09:17:00
|
1424. How to fix logi's vs. assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cass Barr wrote: Tharak Meuridiar wrote: Cass Barr wrote: So, penny-wise and pound-foolish. Not quite. I use infantry builds to generate ISK for vehicle builds. So I'm using my SP to maximize the effectiveness of infantry builds that r...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.21 09:14:00
|
1425. How to fix logi's vs. assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tharak Meuridiar wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: The fact that, in general, the shield recharge delays are lower on the logi suits compared to assault suits is mind boggling. The fact is, for a minor loss in movement speed (unless you're minmata...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.21 09:10:00
|
1426. How to fix logi's vs. assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
The fact that, in general, the shield recharge delays are lower on the logi suits compared to assault suits is mind boggling. The fact is, for a minor loss in movement speed (unless you're minmatar), and no sidearm, you get better shield recharge ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.21 06:05:00
|
1427. PC Report #4 [6/11] - [6/18] Graphics + Summary of Events - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.20 06:04:00
|
1428. We already voted on the skill point system. And you know what happens when they ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: Gigatron Prime wrote: Disagree. The fact this is a topic means people are discussing it. The fact that there is discussion of this means people are obviously not happy with the current system. Counterpoints: 1. Kids be ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.20 05:47:00
|
1429. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
RKKR wrote: Not sure if you updated your initial post with "generally in pubmatches" because of me...but my post was about PC with an added bonus on what I'm noticing in pubmatches. Do we make a chance to win a special prize for talking part i...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 19:33:00
|
1430. Can't sign in on psn. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wait you're in warravens? I thought you were....
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 17:39:00
|
1431. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
IrishWebster wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Now that i lured you in How many People find Planetary Conquest unplayable nowadays? I play many matches and it mostly works for me, but for others that play it, can you just add your voice in, and...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 17:35:00
|
1432. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dengru wrote: I've fell for this twice in five hours.... Then respond!
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:56:00
|
1433. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
iceyburnz wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Now that i lured you in well played. Thanx Bro, played in a pc match recently?
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:40:00
|
1434. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You know, even if you change the title every minute, I can still see it's grayed out, so I've seen the thread before. One of these times you'll reply though right?
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:39:00
|
1435. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Lol. i came ready to bring down hell on you for the title. but it worked. i play around 2 a day and as long as we're not fighting cronos, lag is not a thing to worry about. right i swore when i w...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:32:00
|
1436. Scrambler Rifle - OVERPOWERED - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: In the 2 seconds it takes to charge, the assault rifle can deal 850 damage. 34 damage x 750 RPM / 60 = 425 per second x 2 = 850 for 2 seconds Your argument is bad, it is still outclassed in DP...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:24:00
|
1437. Scrambler Rifle - OVERPOWERED - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: The scrambler is actually quite balanced. It only does 500 damage on a charged headshot with an imperial. That is fairly difficult to do to a moving target, esp with this games awful hit detection. Otherwise, landing a charged ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 16:24:00
|
1438. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: RETREAT IT'S A TRAP Oh come on Mort, how's PC been for ya? you go nerfing tanks and pc will put me to sleep..actually ..i mean im not a slayer but from a logi/av POV pc see...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 15:45:00
|
1439. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: RETREAT IT'S A TRAP Oh come on Mort, how's PC been for ya?
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 15:38:00
|
1440. Planetary Conquest Battles [All PC Vets please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shameless Bump
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.06.19 15:34:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |