| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
241. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What can I say, I aim less in this game and I don't like it. There has to be a reason for it. I dislike hip fire. And no I don't aim within shot gun range.
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 12:17:00
|
242. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gangam Style 2100225579 wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Didn't I already get the OP to admit his mom dropped him on his head? Threads dead. True. but the other option is to turn on y...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 12:15:00
|
243. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: 7 out of 10 times a person hip firing will lose against someone whose aiming. The advantage of hip firing is quicker aiming movement. Seeing as this thread only really talks about AR, HMG, ...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 12:06:00
|
244. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: Even if there is no hit bonus to an aimed shot, this is first shooter where I feel at a disadvantage against a hip fire enemy. I don't know why, maybe its the jerky player movement. Some people are good at ...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 11:58:00
|
245. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: 7 out of 10 times a person hip firing will lose against someone whose aiming. The advantage of hip firing is quicker aiming movement. Seeing as this thread only really talks about AR, HMG, SMG, as they're the only 'hip fire weap...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 11:56:00
|
246. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Even if there is no hit bonus to an aimed shot, this is first shooter where I feel at a disadvantage against a hip fire enemy. I don't know why, maybe its the jerky player movement. Some people are good at hip fire. I am not, so I am biased towa...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 11:53:00
|
247. Most underrated players from the closed beta - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm not even rated.
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 11:30:00
|
248. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Didn't I already get the OP to admit his mom dropped him on his head? Threads dead. True. but the other option is to turn on you like a pack of blood-crazed sharks now. Sounds fun...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 11:26:00
|
249. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: of course I'm comparing dust to other games. If a player is in this for the long haul they will have to overlook new releases of other games. I want Dust to be better than other shooters. Or at least do what ...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:41:00
|
250. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Came in looking to troll... left disappointed... Argument had already devolved to "No, YOU! No, YOU! No, YOU! No, YOU! No, YOU! No, YOU!" without help. I hate it when people are dumb without provocation. I hate it wh...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:33:00
|
251. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
of course I'm comparing dust to other games. If a player is in this for the long haul they will have to overlook new releases of other games. I want Dust to be better than other shooters. Or at least do what most of them do already. The fact tha...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:31:00
|
252. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: When it's clear someone just wants to argue, I don't waste time trying to convince them of anything, supplying them with logic that can be attacked at it's weak point, Y...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:23:00
|
253. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: When it's clear someone just wants to argue, I don't waste time trying to convince them of anything, supplying them with logic that can be attacked at it's weak point, You'll just focus on the weakest part of...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:12:00
|
254. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
When it's clear someone just wants to argue, I don't waste time trying to convince them of anything, supplying them with logic that can be attacked at it's weak point, You'll just focus on the weakest part of the argument and ignore the rest.
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 08:05:00
|
255. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: Dude, if you weren't bickering before, you are now. Especially when you start nit picking words. Not to mention you have this air of some professional debater, (illustra...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 07:51:00
|
256. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: Dude, if you weren't bickering before, you are now. Especially when you start nit picking words. Not to mention you have this air of some professional debater, (illustrate your examples!) which you're not. Ne...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 07:39:00
|
257. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dude, if you weren't bickering before, you are now. Especially when you start nit picking words. Not to mention you have this air of some professional debater, (illustrate your examples!) which you're not. Never mind, I doubt you've played many ot...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 07:28:00
|
258. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: I want to know which games add this bonus damage. You THINK? wtf? You based your entire argument on games you THINK do this? Yeah, its been awhile since I've played either. This is...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 07:04:00
|
259. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: I want to know which games add this bonus damage. You THINK? wtf? You based your entire argument on games you THINK do this? Yeah, its been awhile since I've played either.
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 06:39:00
|
260. There should be extra damage for aiming down sights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: Ryanki wrote: Vanda-Kon wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: I agree... but this post and your original don't match. Military wants a more accurate gun for very obvious reasons. None of it involves the bullet itse...
- by Vanda-Kon - at 2013.01.22 06:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |