| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
8021. [Idea] The Nyx of dropships - module - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Basically, it's a dropship MCRU - with a twist. Once landed (and it can only be activated once landed), it will give the dropship 90% resists on both shields and armor, and activate an MCRU with a spawn timer set to 1, as wel...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 19:11:00
|
8022. AV and vehicle proposed possible solutions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Derrith Erador wrote: Tanks: If the fact that the redline was still alive and well, I'd be for giving it a range buff. But as it is, there are people who camp a rail installation in their red zone for the whole match doing nothing, with 12000 ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 19:07:00
|
8023. Outlaws Reunion (A BIG IF) - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheDarthMa94 wrote: Ever since the Keynote a lot of Outlaws quit the game due to false promises, but 1.9 is coming with new maps and hopefully better frame rate(I'm not counting on this one to be honest) so I manage to convinced most of the Out...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 19:04:00
|
8024. CCP Rattati, possible issue with triple stacking FW booster - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: The only way to have team deploy is to have an either or system Create 16 man squad (can only exist in FW) Join FW queue, q-sync if you want to try and fight another specific 16 man team If no other 16 man squad is queuing, ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 10:33:00
|
8025. 3x Faction boosters - FW the new place to be? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Lets hope this brings up FW activity. Everyone wins in that case. Hardly. While FW participation is up its not a matter of whose militia is more organised, has a more loyal following, etc. It's a matter of whose store...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 10:31:00
|
8026. CCP Rattati, possible issue with triple stacking FW booster - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fantastic if I can't earn my FW content and prove I'm a loyalist then **** it I'm just going to buy it. - Mantra of post 1.9 FW kiddies
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 09:03:00
|
8027. 3x Faction boosters - FW the new place to be? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: Just heard about this on the Biomassed podcast, I have not done the math myself but the point was brought up that triple stacking faction boosters in 1.9 could be a serious way to make LP - thus making more isk with the mar...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 05:26:00
|
8028. I've recently received word from one of the CPMs that..[READ] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bullshit even I'm aware that the CPM has some moderate level of intelligence, charisma, and dashing good looks. I don't believe they pull another fast one on me championing the pushing out PC bullshit when half the content players are waiting for...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 05:24:00
|
8029. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: True Adamance wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Autocannon large turret WHEN?!? I would love a Minmatar Tank. Imagine all tanks getting a damage/RoF bonus to their racial turret, and then a seperate skill for intended usage....
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 04:08:00
|
8030. Dear Snorri Árnason - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: Operative 1125 Lokaas wrote: CommanderBolt wrote: You have gotta love those crazy Icelandic names eh'. I'm European and I have met a lot of people from a lot of different countries but I tell you, Icelandic names are...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:57:00
|
8031. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: True Adamance wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: True Adamance wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: I literally just put a similar post up like five minutes ago. lol Great minds think alike sir! o/ I think CCP will have to focus...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:53:00
|
8032. Tanks & Why bringing the old ones back could present LRG Turret ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: True Adamance wrote: Hmmm I do remember back in the day that my poor skilled Soma just literally could not compete with standard combat Madrugar (the 6735 Armour Maddies of yore) and my guns could not scratch one that ha...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:49:00
|
8033. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: True Adamance wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: I literally just put a similar post up like five minutes ago. lol Great minds think alike sir! o/ I think CCP will have to focus on reworking the LRG Turrets more than the Tank...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:40:00
|
8034. Tanks & Why bringing the old ones back could present LRG Turret ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: We could have turret variants that have more damage , slower ROF, smaller ammo reserves , longer reload times and take up more CPU / PG , I don't know but more variety is good and...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:37:00
|
8035. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: I literally just put a similar post up like five minutes ago. lol Great minds think alike sir! o/ I think CCP will have to focus on reworking the LRG Turrets more than the Tanks. That's what my post is about. I'm glad to se...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:28:00
|
8036. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: Autocannon large turret WHEN?!? I would love a Minmatar Tank. Imagine all tanks getting a damage/RoF bonus to their racial turret, and then a seperate skill for intended usage. Like the Minmatar tank getting a bonus to Au...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:25:00
|
8037. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: True Adamance wrote: Basically what I am doing is trying to come up with a proposal for a readjustment of Vehicles (specifically HAV and their upgraded varients Enforcer and Marauder) and I am trying to make them as fair...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:22:00
|
8038. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Theres a Minmitar HAV I might just start tanking... No its just a jumbled concept and garbled assortment of stats for the Minmatar Marauder with a focus on Shield Boosters and Module Cycling. Resulting in the mos...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:20:00
|
8039. Tanks & Why bringing the old ones back could present LRG Turret ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: If CCP decides to bring them back, I hope they do, I've been thinking about some of the possible issues we might have. I've studied all the damages that the LRG Railgun turrets can do from Basic to Proto. Now, I remember my...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:16:00
|
8040. I'm asking for this: HAV Suggestion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Basically what I am doing is trying to come up with a proposal for a readjustment of Vehicles (specifically HAV and their upgraded varients Enforcer and Marauder) and I am trying to make them as fair as possible. That being said I'd like to get s...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.11.03 03:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |