| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
4101. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Storm Shelton wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Haha, I know all about the pain of being a logi with nubs leading me to my death, its horrible. Yes sir! The good ol' "ISK vs. Bending over occasionally" gig. Never gets old. Fixed mate
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 11:09:00
|
4102. Factional specific gear in fw - in General Discussions [original thread]
The idea of a full minmatar team fighting a full amarr team, what a sight that would be.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 11:07:00
|
4103. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Although guilty of proto stomping in the past, I have seen the light as it were. Who agrees, who disagrees and why. I disagree. The game shouldn't be about limitations at every corner. It should ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 11:05:00
|
4104. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm starting to feel less guilty, keep the disagreements coming.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 11:02:00
|
4105. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Storm Shelton wrote: No. Being a Logi that actually keeps the squad alive requires the best. Playing with my ADV suit equipped with ADV equipment doesn't quite hit the spot. Nothing like repping up two heavies at the same time on battlefront....
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 11:01:00
|
4106. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Storm Shelton wrote: Well, I agree with you on the terms of pub stomping. It does get a bit too ridiculous with certain individuals who exploit every OP asset available, All the time. Nonetheless, It is a realism of Dust514 and you will have ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:46:00
|
4107. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Although guilty of proto stomping in the past, I have seen the light as it were. Who agrees, who disagrees and why. The differnce between the adv and pro amar logi is minimal Yeah, what's your point?
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:43:00
|
4108. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CrotchGrab 360 wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Although guilty of proto stomping in the past, I have seen the light as it were. Who agrees, who disagrees and why. I agree but not on a personal level, only because it destroys what little posit...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:41:00
|
4109. Factional specific gear in fw - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: NO We are mercenaries who buy own gear, not national soldiers supplied by our governments. It would not make sense why these factions would care what we use as long as we get the job done. Furthermore, this idea wou...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:37:00
|
4110. Disallowing proto in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Although guilty of proto stomping in the past, I have seen the light as it were. Who agrees, who disagrees and why.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:25:00
|
4111. Factional specific gear in fw - in General Discussions [original thread]
Theres no right or wrong answer. I personally think it'd be great come 1.8 provided we are 100% getting the rest of the light and heavy suits.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:18:00
|
4112. Factional specific gear in fw - in General Discussions [original thread]
Should it be that we can only use gear specific to the faction we are fighting for? I'm for it but discuss.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 10:13:00
|
4113. Peek without exposure - in General Discussions [original thread]
The ability to lean is something I can get behind, not corner camping third person abilities, not in dust, no.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 09:58:00
|
4114. Peek without exposure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Its just a total waste of time in the grand scheme of things.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 09:48:00
|
4115. Peek without exposure - in General Discussions [original thread]
And scanners much? Just to rub salt in this thread. No, completely pointless, shafts scouts a bit with third person view, corner camping and promotes even more evasive rubbish when getting a decent full on gun fight is hard enough to get without ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 09:43:00
|
4116. Peek without exposure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: COD recently did the corners for this rather smartly controlled on a controller (basically ads near corner and you auto lean) I could see a similar feature being added if the time allowed for it (this would mean that ever...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 09:39:00
|
4117. Peek without exposure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gameplay already favours evasive types enough, immortal clones don't give a fk. I'd say no, theres too much that favours wimpy types and not enough actual gun game. Seriously, these kind of ideas takes us even further away from immortal clones an...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 09:33:00
|
4118. Female heavy suits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TunRa wrote: Why do we even have different genders? I see no reason for any kind of reproductive organs to be on a clone, made for war. Shouldn't we all be asexual? Too late for speculation, too long to explain that one either.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 07:37:00
|
4119. Im MAD at Gallente people....... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Creo dron breach ar is much underrated.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 04:32:00
|
4120. Female heavy suits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fair play kagehoshi but it'd be nice for them to be at least a bit more slender with maybe smooth edges, your both arguing a point, no one is ruining your 'immersion'. Thanks for the bumps.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.26 04:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |