| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
4041. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Glorious warriors seek an honourable death. In dust people do the complete opposite, they strive to stay alive as much as possible using the most evasive tactics and care too much about dying. Our very being in new Eden is basically that of a la...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 09:15:00
|
4042. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luna Angelo wrote: Denak Kalamari wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: Overglorified power? We are immortal. Even the police force that governs us is mortal. If we wanted, if the capsuleers and mercenaries set aside our petty squabbles for a short t...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:56:00
|
4043. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denak Kalamari wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: Overglorified power? We are immortal. Even the police force that governs us is mortal. If we wanted, if the capsuleers and mercenaries set aside our petty squabbles for a short time, we could rule thi...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:55:00
|
4044. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denak Kalamari wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Because they are the cogs of the machine, the whole machine. What cogs? What machine? Both clone soldiers and capsuleers are part of a larger machine that benefit the empires, removing either one r...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:53:00
|
4045. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denak Kalamari wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: People are far too worried about dying in their precious suit for any decent title, and that's the tip of a very large and sht covered iceberg in context to honourable and respectful titles, not us s...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:46:00
|
4046. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
IWS you have filled their fragile minds with delusions of grandeur. There are now merc filth running around thinking they are entitled to self worth! For shame!
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:45:00
|
4047. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luna Angelo wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: Vanguards perhaps? It seems that the Empires send us first, anyways, then the mortal soldiers to clean up, so Vanguard makes sense. ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:42:00
|
4048. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
We are like condoms that can be used over and over again. I'm just putting this clearly into perspective because to speak of any honourable or even close to such titles in dust is laughable.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:41:00
|
4049. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luna Angelo wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Luna Angelo wrote: Vanguards perhaps? It seems that the Empires send us first, anyways, then the mortal soldiers to clean up, so Vanguard makes sense. Too great a title. You are very cynical. I ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:39:00
|
4050. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
People are far too worried about dying in their precious suit for any decent title, and that's the tip of a very large and sht covered iceberg in context to honourable and respectful titles, not us sorry. Infoscum Copies. Infomorph. Subpars. ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:36:00
|
4051. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luna Angelo wrote: Vanguards perhaps? It seems that the Empires send us first, anyways, then the mortal soldiers to clean up, so Vanguard makes sense. Too great a title.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:32:00
|
4052. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denak Kalamari wrote: In the RP circles, duster is a common more casual name for us. We fight in the dust, so that's why we are dusters. Clone soldier/trooper is the other name I use often for a more official term. Then there's the dust bunn...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:31:00
|
4053. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Teilka Darkmist wrote: Got it. Barneys. For two reasons. 1) in one regional slang here in england 'having a barney' means having a disagreement or fight. 2) Because when we go into battle, we 'SUIT UP!' Its Britain you Germanic scumbag. ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:27:00
|
4054. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
And the way players behave doesn't warrant anything but a degrading lowly name.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:24:00
|
4055. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or simply put, copies. Copied scum.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:23:00
|
4056. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scum is still fitting in my mind as well.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:22:00
|
4057. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, I don't like RL stuff being dragged in at all and that name is so far back in our history, it seems stupid that they'd have that namne for anything. Could you take that seriously calling mercs that? We are clone scum, accept it. Sub human se...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 08:20:00
|
4058. Cant we try and fix Snipers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tyjus Vacca wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Snipers are easy to use and very low risk. Thus, low reward. snipers are one of the hardest weapons in the game to use ....... to what are you comparing it to ? You are joking, you have to be.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 07:58:00
|
4059. Game is unbalanced - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leonid Tybalt wrote: Tau Lai wrote: It doesn't make sense you need 3 or 4 people to bring down a tank (one player, >1<) . 1.7 ruined this game. And that is It. You need 3-4 people to bring down a tank IRL too. It's not "unbalanced"...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 07:46:00
|
4060. The Declaration of Independence! - in The War Room [original thread]
ER-Bullitt wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: I would never fight for anyone who can't see the irony in being proud of that independence. Maybe roughly 150 years ago it would have made sense but right now that declaration isn't worth the hemp it was...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.28 00:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |