| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3041. IMPSwarm ~ Who are they? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: The legend345 wrote: IMPSwarm exists because its easyier to manage smaller groups then one large group. Were still maintaining quality. We are constantly working with imperfects were not just there noobs sending isk thr...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.05 03:32:00
|
3042. IMPSwarm ~ Who are they? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I always thought the Impswarms was the Imperfects way of saying, "See, we help newbies too." But now that they ban for forum posts, who knows? :3
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.05 02:56:00
|
3043. IMPSwarm ~ Who are they? - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you're from ZionTCD I'll cover for you <3 Look at me, I'm from the "Good guy corp" yet spend more time trolling the forums then playing the actual game.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.05 02:39:00
|
3044. IMPSwarm ~ Who are they? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gary Vader wrote: Just a heads up for all of the people who keep asking if they are affiliated with Imperfects or the Goons. The Official Stance: IMPSwarm is a feeder corp for the Imperfects as well as a potential stand alone corp, unrelated ...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.05 02:34:00
|
3045. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Sleepy Zan wrote: The dark cloud wrote: seems like that my strategical knowledge woulda have beeing needed there. But oh well left the corp a couple of days ago. Who is going to do mild trolling PR for SI Not m...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.05 01:18:00
|
3046. If Heavies Are Supposed To Be Tanks, Limit the Number of Heavies Allowed in a Game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Polish Hammer wrote: Kain Spero wrote: I agree that the HMG is the issue not the heavy suit (specifically the range of the weapon). I think if they increased the spread of the HMG at range it would largely fix the issue. While I don't ne...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 22:54:00
|
3047. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Polish Hammer wrote: Thread rerail: Glad to see Zion's heavies are running strong. Thanks for dumping the heavy handling unto the rest of us :P We've been trying to keep the heavy section of our TCD forums the most active part of the forums ...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 22:40:00
|
3048. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Polish Hammer wrote: Thread rerail: Glad to see Zion's heavies are running strong.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 22:37:00
|
3049. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: yup, 1,092,200 unspent SP. Haven't played any games today, so it'll raise soon :) Is it okay if i start hating you? I'll add your name to my mailbox. Tons of hate for me in there. HALF of them are calling m...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 22:27:00
|
3050. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
yup, 1,092,200 unspent SP. Haven't played any games today, so it'll raise soon :)
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 22:21:00
|
3051. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Take a second and ask yourself how we organize corp battles. We have a ton of members who all want a piece of the actions - but we like winning, and our vets want to be in every match. With only 8 people allow how does ZionTCD organize all the tea...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:58:00
|
3052. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
General Tiberius1 wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: lol If I wasn't hoarding SP and being useless this build I'd of been pissed I missed out on this. you're hoarding? you're still a better havy then me I've got over a million SP hoarded up
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:52:00
|
3053. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Moon V wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Free Beers wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: 4447 wrote: that wasn't zion's A TEAM. So they substituted one fat man for another? What Zionshad doesnt think you are good enough to fight in corp battle...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:30:00
|
3054. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: 4447 wrote: that wasn't zion's A TEAM. So they substituted one fat man for another? What Zionshad doesnt think you are good enough to fight in corp battles? zion's A team left and formed their...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:22:00
|
3055. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol If I wasn't hoarding SP and being useless this build I'd of been pissed I missed out on this.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:49:00
|
3056. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pays 2 Win wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: You could kick more people for being opinionated and go against everything you all have said about yourselves for half a year to a year now. That should make more threads. Paden's not kickin' up enough dirt...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:30:00
|
3057. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O You should have...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:22:00
|
3058. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O You should have learned from me how to instigate things...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:17:00
|
3059. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:01:00
|
3060. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
William HBonney wrote: We aren't far enough into the game, and yet to see what will come, but as of now the heavies and the hmg are a bit much in the way of balance. Problem is that ccp hasn't tweeked anything yet, just bring out the nerf hamme...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |