| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lol so you would reduce the HAV to a glorified taxi. Scrub move. I can see the headlines already! WANNABCPM Jackal deprives the community of a healthy vehicle dynamic!
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 03:11:00
|
62. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: are you pushing for a serious buff to small turrets? because that would make ADS OP. Not sure where I mentioned serious buff to Small Tur...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 02:51:00
|
63. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Hypothetical, not battle proven concept. Been doing it for months now it rarely fails. got proof? http://www.dustcharts.com/ cuz clearly...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 02:25:00
|
64. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Hypothetical, not battle proven concept. Been doing it for months now it rarely fails. got proof? http://www.dustcharts.com/ cuz clearly 0.H's tank core has been doing something right.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 02:13:00
|
65. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Works for me. I can hit people well enough from 50m; just take it slowly, do it carefully. Lol yeah shooting at stationary militia noobs is EZ. Yep, definitel...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 02:09:00
|
66. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Works for me. I can hit people well enough from 50m; just take it slowly, do it carefully. Lol yeah shooting at stationary militia noobs is EZ.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 02:04:00
|
67. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hypothetical, not battle proven concept.
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:57:00
|
68. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: are you pushing for a serious buff to small turrets? because that would make ADS OP. Not sure where I mentioned serious buff to Small Turret...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:49:00
|
69. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: I played PC from Uprising 1.0 until now. Because YOU haven't seen me, doesn't mean I'm not in PC. That being aside... in PC, you're using a Tank to mow down infantry solo, you SHOULD be able to...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:38:00
|
70. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: are you pushing for a serious buff to small turrets? because that would make ADS OP. Not sure where I mentioned serious buff to Small Turrets... the current Small Railgun can take out an AD...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:37:00
|
71. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: I drive vehicles, a lot. The vehicular anti-infantry should be relegated to Small Guns mounted on the tank, not the main turret. There are still plenty of reasons to...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:28:00
|
72. Tanking in Hotfix Bravo - A second take - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: HAHAHAHA Revising fits (a long process) for my gunnlogi, I have stumbled upon the greatest OP fit so far this build! Given I haven't had a chance to try it against many other tanks (...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:21:00
|
73. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Im talking about PC and competitive scenarios. I have yet to see you on a competitive level so please refrain your irrelevant comments. Lol thinks PC corp gives him the ...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 01:00:00
|
74. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Im talking about PC and competitive scenarios. I have yet to see you on a competitive level so please refrain your irrelevant comments. Lol thinks PC corp gives him the right to talk down ...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 00:57:00
|
75. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance in front of you with a forge, jihad jeep you, so on. The ISK gap is enormous. Thes...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 00:35:00
|
76. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: I drive vehicles, a lot. The vehicular anti-infantry should be relegated to Small Guns mounted on the tank, not the main turret. There are still plenty of reasons to bat phone in rails. an infantry team being 'suppress...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.30 00:34:00
|
77. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Changes I would like to see A passive skill for tighter dispersion and/or nonstupid dispersion decay The rail range buffed and heat build up buffed so that it can fire 5...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.29 23:02:00
|
78. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Changes I would like to see A passive skill for tighter dispersion and/or nonstupid dispersion decay The rail range buffed and heat build up buffed so that it can fire 5 consecutive shots without overheat It would mak...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.29 21:57:00
|
79. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I am all for sensible changes. 6 OP tanks in ambush was ridiculous and not fun for anyone, but having infantry in proto gear dance 40 meters in front of you while bombarding you with AV and your blaster cant seem to hit sh!t....that's not balance....
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.29 21:39:00
|
80. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance in front of you with a for...
- by Shadow of War88 - at 2014.06.29 21:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |