| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. This Thread has been Bacon-ized. With Morgan Freeman. - in General Discussions [original thread]
MMmm ***** sprinkles
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.10 01:37:00
|
102. answer this - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Sextus Hardcock wrote: first sgt cotman wrote: Sextus Hardcock wrote: Fair? You must be new here. New I had this game since the close beta And you haven't realized that in another 3 months the same 'problem' wil...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.10 01:34:00
|
103. answer this - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you think a few million SP is going to turn the tides.... you'd best just Biomass yourself now.
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.10 01:31:00
|
104. Respect to II for reporting OB exploit - in General Discussions [original thread]
http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-orbital-bombardment-exploit-documented and Respect to CCP for patching it out nice and quick. Sex (not sure if this is old news yet, ran a search and got nuthin)
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.10 01:29:00
|
105. answer this - in General Discussions [original thread]
first sgt cotman wrote: Sextus Hardcock wrote: Fair? You must be new here. New I had this game since the close beta And you haven't realized that in another 3 months the same 'problem' will occour again. So essentially you must be ask...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.10 01:22:00
|
106. answer this - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fair? You must be new here.
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.09 23:58:00
|
107. this games horrible - in General Discussions [original thread]
OP biomass yourself please.
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.09 22:20:00
|
108. Aerial Vehicle Ideas - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 for a balanced suggestion. I hope some form of this is coming for DUST.
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 16:19:00
|
109. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vaerana Myshtana wrote: I support this. It does require an overall Field Commander (in the MCC?) to receive the WP. I would also have the WP only count towards OBs and not towards his/her rewards from the match (SP/ISK). My recommendation is...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 16:05:00
|
110. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: And one that puts the vast majority at a major disadvantage is a needed one? who said anything about major. From the very start I've stated that the WP rewards etc... can be adjusted to whatever is balanced. The idea being...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 10:41:00
|
111. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: So you want to give a further advantage to people with Eve support? Particularly encouraging blob tactics which shouldn't affect dust? Having oms is enough of an advantage without making it mandatory Yes, so long as its ...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 02:14:00
|
112. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: That's contribution to the actual battle, not ship babysitting by taking and holding low-orbit they are 1) contributing to the battle by providing superior OBs to Dusties and 2) risking their ships by hanging out in lowse...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 01:39:00
|
113. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adstellarum wrote: so how about the capsuleers can earn some LP just as if they were sitting in a plex.. This is essentially what I'm getting at, and yes LP for the fleet (or some other reward or form of currency) would be appropriate for ...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.08 01:37:00
|
114. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Sextus Hardcock wrote: Put an incentive for fleets to sit in low orbit (not just a warp stabbed throw away destroyer with a cloak) and you'll get a lot of people looking for good fights. Pirates, Capsuleer mercs, Awoxer...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:54:00
|
115. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: It just rewards people for doing what they already should be doing As does, Rezzing, resupplying, capping objectives, shooting people, spawning people in a mCRU ;) DS pilots, hence that argument in invalid.
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:53:00
|
116. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Put an incentive for fleets to sit in low orbit (not just a warp stabbed throw away destroyer with a cloak) and you'll get a lot of people looking for good fights. Pirates, Capsuleer mercs, Awoxers and gankers. It creates content, it will cause ...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:43:00
|
117. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Sextus Hardcock wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: Not war points, no need to give the blob more power in Eve. Isk however I'm fine with Well, there should be an amount of WPs which is acceptable however small it is. No. ...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:40:00
|
118. Who here has video game honor? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delirium Inferno wrote: I don't care much for tea-baggers and trash talkers, they can do what they want. But people who spawn camp or use exploits and glitches take the fun out of gaming. Sorry but spawn camping in this game is a viable tac...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:37:00
|
119. WPs for control of Low Orbit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: Not war points, no need to give the blob more power in Eve. Isk however I'm fine with Well, there should be an amount of WPs which is acceptable however small it is. Dust corps should be incentivized to join up with Eve c...
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:34:00
|
120. tanks are UP - in General Discussions [original thread]
... in the Iraq war... lolRPGs Javelin missiles = Swarms
- by Sextus Hardcock - at 2013.04.07 23:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |