| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. ADS needs buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
I should be able to switch my loadout between missiles & rails.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.21 03:48:00
|
122. At least the forums still work - in General Discussions [original thread]
The day the Earth stood still. Again.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.21 03:47:00
|
123. Server is down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
501st Headstrong wrote: People are logging back in, but this is very strange. I've never seen so many Server issues in a row. Makes me wonder if CCP is being attacked or if it's their servers simply. I also read that Sony is planning on releasi...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.21 03:46:00
|
124. At least the forums still work - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just sayin'.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.21 03:43:00
|
125. Server is down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arrrgg matey. Yee scurvy servers yet be down again.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.21 03:42:00
|
126. Nice Snowball launcher CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can you make a Snowball Cannon for my tank?
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.17 16:14:00
|
127. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have little problems with AV when normal scenarios are running. However when full squads hunt me down cause my team is redlined -- I'm locked out. Which to me, Is a good thing. That's what is supposed to happen. Heck, I can't blame them. Here I ...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.17 15:57:00
|
128. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: True Adamance wrote: Yes nerfing Shield HAV is a valid means of bringing balance to HAV battles. No HAV should have powerful regenerative capacity AND high eHP. That is neither fair nor a good v...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 21:19:00
|
129. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Yes nerfing Shield HAV is a valid means of bringing balance to HAV battles. No HAV should have powerful regenerative capacity AND high eHP. That is neither fair nor a good vehicle design. Either an HAV should have a hig...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 20:53:00
|
130. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think if a pilot post is ever going to taken seriously, It needs to be moderated away from the forums. There needs to be sessions for each individual class of vehicle. For example: IF there was a session where tankers were to come together, ...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 20:36:00
|
131. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Traditionally you do not make a technology that is designed to protect against your own weaponry..... you make one to protect yourself against your enemies technology. Regardless he does say some valuable things even if a...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 20:11:00
|
132. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The problem with vehicles, Is that there really has never been a true discussion that doesn't end up going the complete wrong way. Kind of like the way this post is turning out. Speaker does say some important things in his OP. He is expressing hi...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 19:41:00
|
133. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've always said pilots are the minority in this game. Our words are almost never heard. We used to be one of the pinnacle roles in changing the flow in a match. I think its time we get that role back. The part that saddens me most, Is the fact ...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 18:03:00
|
134. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Couldn't have said it better myself. You have my full support & if you ever need an extra opinion, All you gotta do is ask friend.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 17:56:00
|
135. PD301 (PAND3M0N1UM) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: You should start a channel maybe older pilots may stop by to give a few pointers. Yeah we had a channel set up. Its still there, But we killed it after Fanfest. Wouldn't mind other vet pilots joining in. What I want ...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 16:22:00
|
136. PD301 (PAND3M0N1UM) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darrius Smithmage wrote: I was in the corp but one day I was'not and thought my training was done. PD301 fell apart after Fanfest. You most likely joined right around that time. The leadership took a hiatus & I'm sorry you joined PD301 ...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 15:44:00
|
137. PD301 (PAND3M0N1UM) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Imperious & I created monsters in PD301 & I was damned proud of them all. Remember, This project's foundations were built by Imperious & myself -- So it won't survive without the core ideals we forged. I'll talk to Numnutz if this pr...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 15:42:00
|
138. My 3 week gameplay review. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guns for Glory wrote: I came into dust thinking it was like battlefield but when I played my first game it got better! It brought back my memories of MAG! (R.I.P.) so I continued playing and loved it until.....it took me out of the training mis...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 15:34:00
|
139. PD301 (PAND3M0N1UM) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thinking about restarting this project. It may be just the influence I need to stay involved, Sagaris or not. Start training new tankers & pilots was fun. I think I'd go do it again if I could get Imperious to jump back into PD301 as well. I...
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 15:20:00
|
140. I am disappointed with the Caldari - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you don't have Caldari Shields, You're doing it wrong.
- by Quasar Storm - at 2014.12.14 15:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |