| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
401. My thoughts on Dust and a move to PC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The boat has set sail a long time ago and now other boats have already took to the water. If it moves to PS4 then it competes with PS2 but also loses time in updating the game but could gain more players. It moves to ...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 19:28:00
|
402. leaving battle working as intended ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
phucinfiniteisk wrote: Infinite isk players r running off players.NOT GAME MECHANICS. Does CCP enable infinite isk players? AND Y? someone is butt hurt my my
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 19:15:00
|
403. leaving battle working as intended ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
phucinfiniteisk wrote: Yeah, when players with common sense notice a kdr farming in pubs, we're leaving. I doubt ur having a gudtime. CCP doesn't refill squads, wich is y there r so many leaving battle threads from stat padders. Do u enjoy runn...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 19:14:00
|
404. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: shaman oga wrote: Camping Maybe if you are a sniper or laser rifle commando. lols laser rifle commando...ive never been killed by one
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:38:00
|
405. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denesian Morenti wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: was it meant to be an av suit?..so u can carry av and anti infantry toys? was it mean to be a killer? why do i only really see it used for av? it doesnt seem to shine like the assaults do for sla...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:21:00
|
406. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: XxBlazikenxX wrote: It is meant to be a slow tanky damage platform that is meant to be used with a squad as a force multiplier. It is meant to be versatil...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:19:00
|
407. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: XxBlazikenxX wrote: It is meant to be a slow tanky damage platform that is meant to be used with a squad as a force multiplier. It is meant to be versatile and ready for any situation presented. Wha...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:16:00
|
408. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: was it meant to be an av suit?..so u can carry av and anti infantry toys? was it mean to be a killer? why do i only really see it used for av? it doesnt seem to shine like the assaults do for slaying...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:14:00
|
409. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: It is meant to be a slow tanky damage platform that is meant to be used with a squad as a force multiplier. It is meant to be versatile and ready for any situation presented. What I want is for its role to be separated from...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:12:00
|
410. No news from warlords 1.3 ? CPM ? CCP ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
postapo wastelander wrote: olssam 62 wrote: New skins in dropbox ergo nothing new XD worst part is that actually sounds like ccp
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:11:00
|
411. No news from warlords 1.3 ? CPM ? CCP ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
D4GG3R wrote: Warlords 1.3: Dust 514 ported to Gameboy Color. ide like to see it on that new ds lol
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:10:00
|
412. what is commandos intended role? - in General Discussions [original thread]
was it meant to be an av suit?..so u can carry av and anti infantry toys? was it mean to be a killer? why do i only really see it used for av? it doesnt seem to shine like the assaults do for slaying ...do you think it has to many drawbacks? i...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:07:00
|
413. please dont buff lr - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bradric Banewolf wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Bradric Banewolf wrote: I was soooo glad when the galass AR RoF bonus didn't effect the TacAR and burst AR! Those weapons take skill (or modded controller for those with n...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 18:01:00
|
414. dust no longer has an lav presence or a vehicle presence - in General Discussions [original thread]
DDx77 wrote: You can say CCP ruined vehicles but the reality is it is vehicle users ruined vehicles. When I started playing this game corps like Nyan San were spamming invincible tanks that farmed infantry every match. I'm not the only one wh...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:53:00
|
415. Victor's LR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Union118 wrote: Its very powerful i agree. I think it needs a distance nerf. The farther the beam travels the cooler it gets. Least in theory. I personally believe people who request that the officer laser rifle sho...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:51:00
|
416. [Discussion] [Ideas] Vehicles... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bradric Banewolf wrote: Agree with the OP here, and aggrohim, if you read the part where he's actually changing the way tanks are fitted by making tanks less reliant on active hardeners, you can see how a tanker can actually stay on the battlef...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:39:00
|
417. please dont buff lr - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Bradric Banewolf wrote: I was soooo glad when the galass AR RoF bonus didn't effect the TacAR and burst AR! Those weapons take skill (or modded controller for those with no skill), and would've easily become fotm like da...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:29:00
|
418. leaving battle working as intended ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
omg is that why matches have been a lil rougher today for me are all the srubs leaving and being replaced by people who can put up a fight>? if so thank you guys...for spicing up the battle field by removing yourselves
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:15:00
|
419. dust no longer has an lav presence or a vehicle presence - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: I blame 1.7. Why was so much content removed? There was really no reason for it. because it made it hard to balance and most all of that content if not all was removed uprising 1.0
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 17:12:00
|
420. please dont buff lr - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Every race apart form Amarr has a light AV weapon... Don't hesitate, make the LR AV. dont make the lr av ..make an av variant ..they had best not change the curre...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2015.11.04 16:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |