| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3081. insulting the logistics class - in General Discussions [original thread]
just because scrubs suck at dust (big surprise) doesnt mean a whole class is bad ..yes you can pull top of the boards without firing a bullet in dust..yes that same person can get those same scores while killing 20 or 30 people..just because SCRUB...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 10:38:00
|
3082. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: True Adamance wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: Athena Sentinel wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Just because they can carry multiple equipment, doesn't mean they are suppose to carry a nano injector or repair tool. Uplinks ...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 10:34:00
|
3083. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: Athena Sentinel wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Just because they can carry multiple equipment, doesn't mean they are suppose to carry a nano injector or repair tool. Uplinks and nanohives are just...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 10:31:00
|
3084. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
my standard logi only match looks like this 20/0 2300 wp if i run av as well add 4-8 kills and another 1-2 k wp in a coordinated squad i pull less kills naturally and more wp generally...it is not often a full coordinated squad of vets bumps int...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 10:25:00
|
3085. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Athena Sentinel wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Just because they can carry multiple equipment, doesn't mean they are suppose to carry a nano injector or repair tool. Uplinks and nanohives are just as important. Plus the ONLY logistics suit th...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 10:18:00
|
3086. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Talos Vagheitan wrote: These forums are starting to make me think I should invest heavily in Kleenex companies. Already ahead if you. gimme i hasa cold
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 09:53:00
|
3087. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: G Torq wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Yeah, all the Dust players got together and agreed that we don't need another Respec. i seriously doubted...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 09:52:00
|
3088. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Why would AV need a respec, its been broken for a long while... hell im not complaining, I came to the sudden realisation that dont play dust any ...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 09:50:00
|
3089. isk rewards - in General Discussions [original thread]
ok so recently i dropped into a match was around the last five minutes judging from when i got in and looked at the times 4:30 left...now before i spawn the first time in any match i do a quick overview of 1 the map 2 the score boards.. and depe...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.07 09:45:00
|
3090. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
but regardless obviously ccp is going to do the slow painfull route i was just curious as to why they just didnt do this as to me it looks like all that they really need to do.
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 21:50:00
|
3091. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lithkul devant wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: has ccp mentioned giving havs a base res...it makes no sense that logi lavs come with 30% res naturally but tanks start with 0 a better way over all to balancing tanks is really simple, give all tanks...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 21:49:00
|
3092. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lithkul devant wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: has ccp mentioned giving havs a base res...it makes no sense that logi lavs come with 30% res naturally but tanks start with 0 a better way over all to balancing tanks is really simple, give all tanks...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 21:48:00
|
3093. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: You say you don't want things more complicated but then you ask for all vehicles to get base resistance, thus complicating vehicles at their base. The way to balance AV against vehicles is simply to reduce the damage that AV ...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 21:44:00
|
3094. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Don't like idea of respec's but not going to burn logibro at the stake if it happens. no one would burn logi bro at the stake he is the most usefull member of ccp when it comes to dust 514
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 19:13:00
|
3095. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Logibro said it is going to happen with vehicle skills (refund; not respec), but he does not know if it will be submitting a ticket, a server-wide blanket refund of everything in vehicle command, turrets, and vehicle upgrad...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 19:12:00
|
3096. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
and that does not include me i may only have half my sp into vehicle but losing 13 million sp would seriously **** anyone off ...they cannot do that. i have 26 million sp in dust....i should not have to lose half my versatility because ccp cant re...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 17:29:00
|
3097. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
G Torq wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Yeah, all the Dust players got together and agreed that we don't need another Respec. i seriously doubted this included people dedicated into av and veh...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 17:27:00
|
3098. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
yeah we do lol respec is their only option they are the one's that removed the closed beta tag ona unfinished game,...they're are aur vehicles and modules and people who posses them...and that means that money needs to be returned as does the s...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 16:48:00
|
3099. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av)
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 16:32:00
|
3100. Vehicles and my thoughts on 1.5-1.9 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: You know they're getting rid of logi LAVs when they make the vehicle changes, right? They are also changing AV weapon stats. i know they have to make everything complicated its not like i dont have loads of other proto gear...
- by Mortedeamor - at 2013.10.06 16:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |