| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2841. Combat rifle still insanely OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kovinis Sparagas wrote: Are you talking about combat rifle as a rifle, or as a group of rifles, because they are called assault rifles (not to be confused with the assault riffle) He is talking about the titles of weapons that CCP has grante...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 11:55:00
|
2842. Stop the 1.8 QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
I believe several factors contributed to 1.8 changes that are on the pipeline. I don't think it has to do with usage of items but more so that numerous threads echoing the same sentiment were taken into account. 1. NPE 2. TTK 3. RR is OP While s...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 11:51:00
|
2843. Stop the 1.8 QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
So the community is wrong for using the avenues afforded to them?
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 11:39:00
|
2844. Dust ask for cosmetics eve gets it first - in General Discussions [original thread]
Of course the PS3 tech is outdated. It's been, what, a decade? Tech can be outdated within a week or less.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 09:00:00
|
2845. Combat rifle still insanely OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I look at it like this, if you're willing to call RR out for being "OP", then lets not stop there. Lets talk about the CR and the SCR. That's the problem I had with the "RR is OP" threads and posts. When I face CR and SCR, I know what I'm up again...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 08:57:00
|
2846. Dust ask for cosmetics eve gets it first - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guys want Hello Kitty designs?? Interesting.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 08:48:00
|
2847. Combat rifle still insanely OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want 1.8 to get here already so I can see the actual field test runs. I wonder how the community will respond and what they will specialize in next.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 06:33:00
|
2848. Can We Get some DEV clarification on some things? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yep, CalSen needs that 1 second delay.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 06:30:00
|
2849. Minmatar Sentinel Looks Subpar - in General Discussions [original thread]
I thought I was going to see some pictures. I am disappoint
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 06:29:00
|
2850. So if we do get a respec. - in General Discussions [original thread]
There's a possibility you thread will get locked. There's a whole thread discussion here .
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 04:37:00
|
2851. Will Dust be able to port over assets to PS4 or is this all wasted - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cotsy8 wrote: Michael Arck wrote: So basically, "Is Dust 514 coming to PS4?". That's not the question. Its a good question. If Dust514 is ported to PS4 will players be able to transfer their characters over to PS4 or will a potential nee...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 03:22:00
|
2852. Will Dust be able to port over assets to PS4 or is this all wasted - in General Discussions [original thread]
So basically, "Is Dust 514 coming to PS4?".
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 03:05:00
|
2853. What mic do you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol I just got a regular samsung bluetooth. Works great!
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:51:00
|
2854. 1.8 Whos keeping what they got? - in General Discussions [original thread]
As always I will stick with what I have. And, as always, if adjustments need to be made...they will be made.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:27:00
|
2855. Finally the tank and rr QQ and defenders are done - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: now its going to be cr qq because crs were always the op rifle not rr You sir are one of the very few on here who actually knows the truth. Can't tell the lemmings that tho. ...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:24:00
|
2856. Pre-1.7 heavy registry (no FotM heavies allowed) - in General Discussions [original thread]
buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: Michael Arck wrote: LOL you say no FOTM users but yet, this is the first heavy registry thread I've seen. Just recently mustered up the pride, I see. No, i dont want us dedicated heavies to get mixed up with ...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:19:00
|
2857. AHHHHH HELLL NAAAAHHH - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's called the pecking order...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:15:00
|
2858. EVENT: Mercenary Cup - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pot still at 64.5? If I can remember Friday morning, I will send you a mil to make a 65.5. Yea I know, whoopty doo...but 64.5 is just too odd.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:14:00
|
2859. Finally the tank and rr QQ and defenders are done - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: now its going to be cr qq because crs were always the op rifle not rr You sir are one of the very few on here who actually knows the truth. Can't tell the lemmings that tho. sebastian the huds wrote: I beg to diff...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:07:00
|
2860. Pre-1.7 heavy registry (no FotM heavies allowed) - in General Discussions [original thread]
LOL you say no FOTM users but yet, this is the first heavy registry thread I've seen. Just recently mustered up the pride, I see.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.03.07 02:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |