| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
21. [Suggestion] a little more use for the melee upgrade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
deepfried salad gilliam wrote: Mac Dac wrote: actually i was thinking around 10% reduction for pro. Since the rapid reload skll only makes about a .5 difference and it gives use some more useful mods for our high slots. Their are good high...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.12.08 19:42:00
|
22. [Suggestion] a little more use for the melee upgrade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
actually i was thinking around 10% reduction for pro. Since the rapid reload skll only makes about a .5 difference and it gives use some more useful mods for our high slots.
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.12.08 00:04:00
|
23. [Suggestion] a little more use for the melee upgrade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I thought that the melee upgrades would be greatly benefited from adding a reload speed bonus. The melee upgrade effects melee ,so in my mind melee goes with arms... why not effect time to reload too. i dont know if anyone mentioned this before s...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.12.07 23:39:00
|
24. [Request ]Ring-shaped outpost - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Mobius Kaethis wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/xx12/KAGEHOSHI-/outpostidea_zps03084cd0.png Team 1 can easily get A, team can easily take C. Both teams can then head towa...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.11.23 03:08:00
|
25. A re-design of the Plasma Cannon - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
the plasma was suppose to be a anti-vehicle weapon, but the bullet speed was too slow and it did virtually nothing to vehicles. Now people use it more of a portable mortor rather then AV. And with its current mechanics it fits that title better t...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.22 13:01:00
|
26. [FEEDBACK] CCP Logibro, equipment spam is NOT a bug! Please read! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: SirManBoy wrote: I-Shayz-I wrote: The best solution is to make it so that when you drop a 4th nanohive, the first one disappears, no matter what kind of nanohive it is. The reason for 4 nanohives max is because there is ...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.15 04:52:00
|
27. [FEEDBACK] CCP Logibro, equipment spam is NOT a bug! Please read! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SirManBoy wrote: CCP Logibro, You recently referenced the following thread on your bug report: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1296671 I respectfully request some explanation for this. Why would a self-proclaimed logi...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 15:32:00
|
28. [FEEDBACK] CCP Logibro, equipment spam is NOT a bug! Please read! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
i disagree with the op. there shouldn't be a thousand uplinks around a certain 10m area from the same person, so im in favor with limiting equipment. however i believe it wouldn't be as much as an issue if we can pick up our equipment so that we ...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 15:09:00
|
29. [Request] make this the heavy aircraft!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
aw great.... now this tread is making me want something that we don't even know is going to be in game. i want this so bad... no other game will have anything like this. PLEASE CCP!!! I promise we'll be good on the forums.
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 14:44:00
|
30. [request] GET DOWN IN THE BATTLE ROOM!!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Amy Artic wrote: Proto dance moves. I approve. as long as i can do air flares and noobs can't then im good with that.
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 14:29:00
|
31. [Request] make this the heavy aircraft!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
i would honestly spend tons of sp on this bad boy, even if it had no turrets and flew like a 747. seriously i could have no weapons at all, but if it can carry vehicles and or infantry then this 5mil isk (seems about right campared to the high pri...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 03:52:00
|
32. [request] GET DOWN IN THE BATTLE ROOM!!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
fawkuima juggalo wrote: I know i'm not alone out there when i bust out the occasional "one-two step" in the battle room i've even dance with other people we even got our whole squad up in a dance crew and served some people... lol For real thou...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 03:27:00
|
33. [request] GET DOWN IN THE BATTLE ROOM!!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jade Hasegawa wrote: And there was me thinking that was someone dry humping my ass b4 battle...kinda relieved lol why i don't hump females in the war barge.... nough said.
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 03:23:00
|
34. Supply Depots and 1.5 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: Mac Dac wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the current slots available for a vehicle and my need for survivability -speed- and power, I see an ammo cache module as something that could potentially gimp my vehicle's ability...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 03:14:00
|
35. [Request] Vehicle Active Scanners like Infantry Ones - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
i think the current vehicle scanner module works well for vehicles. I mean as a vehicle you don't need to track enemies but rather know your surroundings. So if someone sneaks up on you you'll see them with the current scanner where as your vehi...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 03:06:00
|
36. Supply Depots and 1.5 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: With the current slots available for a vehicle and my need for survivability -speed- and power, I see an ammo cache module as something that could potentially gimp my vehicle's ability to shrug off AV and more. Lets just see...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.14 02:48:00
|
37. [Dev/moderator response appreciated] Respec topic sticky - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A sticky saying where devs stand on the mater is a good idea and helps with confusion and duplicate thread. Now my opinion is that we shouldn't do respecs unless CCP does some drastic change or something and im not talking about balancing but mor...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.13 14:37:00
|
38. Supply Depots and 1.5 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
heard rumors that vehicles might be able to supply off of nanohives ,but i dought it. And i believe that vehicles will be geting an ammo cathe module so that resupplying isn't so frequent.
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.13 13:45:00
|
39. Thoughts on the new map - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
WOW this map looks great, but i just want confirmation that some 'design errors' arent a problem in this new map. For example, LAVs being able to squeeze into areas they aren't suppose to. But yeah as long as there is legitimate indor areas wher...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.02 15:29:00
|
40. Thoughts on the new map - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: CCP LogicLoop wrote: CAELAN Andoril wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Soon Minmatar Cargo Hub Really, now? First Caldari Production Facility, then Minmatar Cargo Hub. We already have 2 Caldari out...
- by Mac Dac - at 2013.09.02 14:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |