| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2381. Scrambler Rifle Pros vs Cons - in General Discussions [original thread]
My only beef with it is that it is supposed to be a tactical weapon but is treated as a spam the **** out of the trigger type weapon. Same goes for CR.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 04:47:00
|
2382. It's our own fault... - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol. Dem conspiracies doh.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 04:44:00
|
2383. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
xavier zor wrote: The scrambler rifle is in a great place now. It melt's shield-tanking suits just like the CR melt' armor-tanking suits. The CR is the king of CQC in armor-profile weapons and the laser-rifle is king of CQC in shield-profile ...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 04:31:00
|
2384. Apparently all is OP, and all is permitted - in General Discussions [original thread]
WTH? Goddamit, it was a freaking hyperbole... And I never said the PLC was OP! Damn you all!!!
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 04:07:00
|
2385. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
OK. At this point, I just want the AScR to be buffed to compete with the BK, ARR, and AR. Also, I guess what makes the CR and ScR better than the AR and the RR is that they are generalist rifles, as in they cover a very nice swath of range, where...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 04:04:00
|
2386. Remotes - in General Discussions [original thread]
No. I must defend my crutch with all my might. Sike. Only OHKO weapon (that can be resupplied) should be PLC for light weapons.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 03:57:00
|
2387. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright, you got me. I do not have 100% verifiable proof as of now, and won't until this weekend. Then we can have a discussion. However, this has little to do with my original assertion that the ScR is too good up close, damage wise. It still n...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 03:46:00
|
2388. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
All Gucci wrote: LUGMOS wrote: SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: SCR penalty is -80% damage to armor making it rather difficult to finish off armor tanked enemies before it overheats Yes, and is that not how it should be? If the ScR was forced t...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 03:21:00
|
2389. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: Compare the current long range abilities of the RR to the SCR (since these are the two weapons you are comparing), the mid range, short range, and CQC abilities. Then you may go from (Waaaaahhhh!) to (insert excellent point fol...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 03:06:00
|
2390. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
All Gucci wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Protocake JR wrote: Oh wow, this thread again. Lol, cept this time it has actual rational. why is it rational? what makes you so special that your opinion is considered a fact? It's not opinion... ...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:57:00
|
2391. Name your price: BPO's - in General Discussions [original thread]
Would pay 40-50 million for Quafe PLC. Or pay 30 million plus an assortment of Officer Weapons, maybe 20-30 total.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:39:00
|
2392. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Protocake JR wrote: Oh wow, this thread again. Lol, cept this time it has actual rational. *OP posts about rational* *OP neglects to include all facts about SCR in his rational* *context lost* Do...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:36:00
|
2393. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shamarskii Simon wrote: What i think LUGMOS is saying is "you fire straight to OH, no temperature control but expect to be able to kill just like that." Now, linking to RR kick = ScR O.H, the RR cannot kill "easily" by the mule kick around 10-...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:35:00
|
2394. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
WeapondigitX V7 wrote: The scrambler has much less optimal and effective range than the rail rifle thus it needs to have much better ability up close. Its higher fitting cost and lower damage per overheat compared to the assault rifle also cr...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:33:00
|
2395. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: LUGMOS wrote: SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: SCR penalty is -80% damage to armor making it rather difficult to finish off armor tanked enemies before it overheats Yes, and is that not how it should be? If the ScR was fo...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:12:00
|
2396. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gosh darnit you Amarr scrubs... What I propose is not a direct nerf... If you're using it at it's intended range. To go along with this change, the AScR should be buffed to make up for the normal variant's newly imposed shortcoming. That is the...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 02:03:00
|
2397. Scrambler Rife - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zindorak wrote: RR maybe nerfed now but ARR is still a monster and better than ScR. Why do you think most gk.0's,ak.0's and even some mk.0 assaults use it. Dunno. Maybe the same reason I see a lot of gk.0's, mk.0's, and ck.0's using g the S...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 01:57:00
|
2398. Fix AFK accounts CCP. The Cowardice of Z platoon (Caldari FW) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Do I hear minimum sp requirement? True. This would be good. Only CCP will never implement it, as it would go against their "APEX iz for newbros" and if they go against it, it will expose their AUR milking ways.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 01:52:00
|
2399. Enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol. And I thought it was going to be something really serious.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 01:49:00
|
2400. Fix AFK accounts CCP. The Cowardice of Z platoon (Caldari FW) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Inb4 valid tactic Inb4 HTFU (Please don't hurt me)
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.02.06 01:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |