| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
501. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Thank you for bringing up the dropship. Contrary to what you suggest, they do not make tanks useless. You see, if the missile launcher is altered to be... Useful for purpose (i.e. attacking aer...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.23 02:57:00
|
502. Stories of a Fallen Immortal - in DUST 514 Fiction [original thread]
Nrabatar Zorig wrote: True Adamance wrote: ((Awww now I have to hate you. Poor sod chose the wrong religion.)) I may or may not have gone Minmatar intentionally to make you morally conflicted. :3 ... Wonderful...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.23 02:09:00
|
503. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: [...] you can't balance tanks vs infantry on the premise that infantry can hide in complexes, because any positives he infantry ...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.23 01:55:00
|
504. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: [...] you can't balance tanks vs infantry on the premise that infantry can hide in complexes, because any positives he infantry gains from the complex can also be used by the ta...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.22 16:49:00
|
505. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: [...] you can't balance tanks vs infantry on the premise that infantry can hide in complexes, because any positives he infantry gains from the complex can also be used by the tank for his favour [...] Just watch this , man...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.22 15:41:00
|
506. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Never said anything about them being operated by one player. You could easily have the main cannon being operated by a second player (thus requiring an actual "tank crew" of at least 2) Also in my ...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 23:03:00
|
507. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: As with weapons like the MassDriver you have to be out of cover in order to shoot the target, in cover you must out of cover to do so, as such you can assume the enemy will take the logical option and shoot back, or move out o...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 23:01:00
|
508. Ability to Set Red - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ziiro Celeste wrote: RED - A player that recently killed another player in PVP/E area of the game YELLOW - A player that recently engaged in a battle in PVP/E area of the game, but escaped/fled GREY - A neutral player GREEN - Players in your...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 22:40:00
|
509. Gaming mouse abuse or etiquette? - in General Discussions [original thread]
This guy seems to be doing just fine with a regular mouse.
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 13:56:00
|
510. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: In the end it doesnt matter though, you cannot make a tank that requires multiple infantry to destroy if that tank is only operated by a single player. It is, functionally, exactly the same as saying a heavy suit should require...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 13:48:00
|
511. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: No I merely startmthe engagement at the correct time, if you are in cover this is the same as not engaging the enemy since neither of you are firing upon each other, you are bet...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 12:59:00
|
512. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: No I merely startmthe engagement at the correct time, if you are in cover this is the same as not engaging the enemy since neither of you are firing upon each other, you are between engagememts. You do not need to consider en...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 11:54:00
|
513. Why New Eden should be on fire forever - in DUST 514 Fiction [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: DRAKE KILN wrote: We don't die so how can anyone win. With an infinite army on both sides battles should go on forever. Whole planets reduced to smoldering waist lands and population forced from their homes or forced to ...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 10:23:00
|
514. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
If tanks are so easy to kill, what Is the point of having them? You seem to be mistaking my argument as an emotional pro tank one for some reason. Know that I am nether a tanker nor emotional. Let's say you are the leader of some faction. And you...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 10:19:00
|
515. I don't understand - in General Discussions [original thread]
All throughout this thread; the word BPO has been so misused. https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Blueprint#Overview If you want suits to never deplete, say infinite stock , not BPO ; or the two different concepts WILL be confused.
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 09:38:00
|
516. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Only problem I have with this is the part where you talk about turrets (what do you think a turret that is AI friendly vs. AV friendly is?), and the part where you say...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 02:07:00
|
517. [request] low altitude fleet battles. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here's your sources: http://www.webelements.com/titanium/chemistry.html http://youtu.be/DLlykUHHAcQ?t=30s
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 01:24:00
|
518. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Only problem I have with this is the part where you talk about turrets (what do you think a turret that is AI friendly vs. AV friendly is?), and the part where you say that there is at minimum, which I think you covered u...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 01:16:00
|
519. I don't understand - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only way that I could see suit BPO's working is if they are exactly that: Blueprints. In EVE the Bigger, Badder, B¦¦e¦¦t¦¦t¦¦e¦¦r¦¦,¦¦ ¦¦f¦¦a¦¦s¦¦t¦¦e¦¦r¦¦,¦¦ ¦¦s¦¦t¦¦r¦¦o¦¦n¦¦g¦¦e¦¦r¦¦ ships can be manufactured using BPOs. The trend is that ...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 01:08:00
|
520. vehicles vs. infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: You make a good point, and I agree with you, but there shouldn't be a "One is better than the other period", which is the whole point of me making this thread.I think you get that though. I do agree with you on it not ...
- by Hawk-eye Occultus - at 2014.05.21 01:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |