| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
221. All This Talk Of LAZORS..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It needs more range, slightly higher damage and a better zoom. It IS a laser after all...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.18 13:23:00
|
222. Question for Scouts - in General Discussions [original thread]
DEZKA DIABLO wrote: Main reason, until the high dps , AA, an new rifles a lot of scouts viewed rifles as DIRTY AN SCRUBBISH. Now most of us said F it and got sick of dying from 75 m out an figured it's very good range an dps , but still a lot ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.18 13:21:00
|
223. Question for Scouts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sidearms are fun, use less fitting resources and cost less isk.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.18 13:17:00
|
224. BWAH HAHAHA !!!! subject scrubler rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think your are doing well because it's a high alpha damage medium downtime weapon. So it fits perfectly whit the hit and run tactics you are probably using with the minnie scout.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.18 13:15:00
|
225. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: No. Actually yes, I agree with Atiim (for most of the things)
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 23:00:00
|
226. hmg vs vehicle - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is to take out immobile lavs. Other than that... no
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:35:00
|
227. Countering nyaintankspambush - in General Discussions [original thread]
OR everyone spawns in with rail incubuses and blast the mofos to hell.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:24:00
|
228. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Faunher wrote: To start, LAVs should be better at killing and supporting infantry (not murder-taxi wise) and HAVS should be geared towards taking out LAVs and other HAVs. Militia HAVs should be less effective. Scrap the wave of opportunity id...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:17:00
|
229. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
R F Gyro wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I have only seen "wahwah dat tank iz op" (I know some people said the same about AV but that's not the point here). So, here is your oportunity to tell me: what do YOU want tanks to actually be like? Plea...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:13:00
|
230. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
These are good ideas people (well, most of them lol). Keep em coming.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:09:00
|
231. Why dont we have officer weapons for the new weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's such a joke, it's not like it takes a frikkin comity to make an officer weapon. JUST MAKE IT OP FFS.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 21:03:00
|
232. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ResistanceGTA wrote: Actual waves of opportunity, not perma-hardened infantry slaying mobiles, that's all I ask. Balancing module for tanks/LAVs/DSs/ADSs, however, is a pretty big feat. Oh, and points for damage would be nice. Having a vehicle...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 20:58:00
|
233. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Racial Tanks Swarm Buff Plasma Cannon Buff More AV Options Webifiers This, sooooo much of this. And wp for damage done.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 20:51:00
|
234. Actual question: What does infantry want tanks to be like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Tanks are in a good place. Its Av that needs to be fixed. I 100% agree with that
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 17:24:00
|
235. Why are people moaning about scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: Read the sig, Psychotic Suicidal scout at your service. Who do I blow up or stab first? I prefer the remote explosive suicide run. Now, if only we could stick them to our own bodies... IMPLEMENT IT CCP!!!
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:55:00
|
236. A respec for 1.8 must happen - in General Discussions [original thread]
trololol
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:53:00
|
237. 1.8 skill respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because we don't have enough threads about it already
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:53:00
|
238. 1.8 skill refund. - in General Discussions [original thread]
*quadfacepalm* THERE ARE 9 OTHER THREADS ABOUT THE SAME TOPIC YOU TWIT
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:52:00
|
239. 1.8 Infantry SPs refund. - in General Discussions [original thread]
*face... I ran out of ideas*
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:51:00
|
240. 1.8 Respec is mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
*facesomethingharderthanthewall*
- by Flix Keptick - at 2014.02.17 15:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |