| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
801. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
hackerzilla wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: hackerzilla wrote: Hey example... yes you know who I am. Ahhhhhh that fan mail of yours was quite exquisite! So was your mass driver. Even more so than dusts finest missile tank, and somehow you ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 17:47:00
|
802. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: So wait I don't understand. Exmaple you said that both are broke. Now are you saying that the Mass Driver is OP and that Large Missile Turrets are broke or that infantry splash weapons are > than large splash turrets ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 17:38:00
|
803. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anyone else bothered that standard mass drivers are better than tanks?
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 17:18:00
|
804. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
FLAYLOCK Steve wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: FLAYLOCK Steve wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: The standard lv1 mass driver has blast radius of 4 meters, a splash of 116 damage and a direct damage of 242. It has a clip of 6 and 18 shots total. It...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 15:23:00
|
805. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
7 Djin wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: because it is extreemly rare for all 4 missles to hit, the only time they would is if you are about 6 to 10 meters away from your target, but even then its not guaranteed because o...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 14:36:00
|
806. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
semperfi1999 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Mass driver is wielded by a squishy infantry player easily killed by everything in the game. Missiles are on a tank... that is only vulnerable to spe...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 14:32:00
|
807. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jenza's Pants wrote: Missiles were good as a AI weapon. Again, CCP never took my advice, 2 models of missiles, large and small: lock on AV, low splash, but made to penetrate vehicle armor, and a dumbfire high splash but low hit dmg, made specif...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 14:17:00
|
808. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
hackerzilla wrote: Hey example... yes you know who I am. Ahhhhhh that fan mail of yours was quite exquisite! So was your mass driver. Even more so than dusts finest missile tank, and somehow you think it's skill to kill someone with it? You...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 14:06:00
|
809. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Small turrets aren't that hard to beat. I would rather use a standard flaylock than a proto small cycle missile- they're absolutely terrible. He's talking about large. As it was proven before...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 05:37:00
|
810. Madrugar Hybrid > Shield Gunnlogi for Spider Tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: wait wait wait wait wait. wait. So... madrugars shield tank better than shield tanks, too? Im done. F*ck it. Anyone want my stuff? im full speced into a shieeelddd tank!! you can use it to remote rep Jas...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 05:35:00
|
811. Every explosive weapon is amazing...except missile turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Large and small, they're horrible for killing infantry. Honestly, they need to have the damage output of the Core Flaylock in 1.2, seeing as they are mounted on a tank and need to have more splash range than mass dri...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:49:00
|
812. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: I'm not sure where to do with this post Bc on one hand, the missile turret absolutely decimates armor tanks, but is worthless for killing infantry compared the the mass driver. The mass driver can kill tanks though, of i...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:46:00
|
813. Madrugar Hybrid > Shield Gunnlogi for Spider Tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
wait wait wait wait wait. wait. So... madrugars shield tank better than shield tanks, too? Im done. F*ck it. Anyone want my stuff? im full speced into a shieeelddd tank!! you can use it to remote rep Jasons shield madrugar, but he prolly wont let ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:40:00
|
814. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Small turrets aren't that hard to beat. I would rather use a standard flaylock than a proto small cycle missile- they're absolutely terrible. He's talking about large. As it was proven before...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:27:00
|
815. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Mass driver is wielded by a squishy infantry player easily killed by everything in the game. Missiles are on a tank... that is only vulnerable to specific AV weaponry and has a crap ton of health...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:26:00
|
816. A serious question to all drivers and pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Heathen Bastard wrote: Honestly? they were fun to use pre-uprising. not OP, but not weak either, they were just about right. so after realizing the playing a scout was not...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 04:24:00
|
817. standard mass Mass drivers are more effective than proto large missles and proof - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: even the accelerated can't hit an installation at 100 meters with anything more than the first or second missiles. 3 is a massive surprise. of course, it's also the only explosive weapon with damage falloff as well. beca...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 03:33:00
|
818. A serious question to all drivers and pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Heathen Bastard wrote: Honestly? they were fun to use pre-uprising. not OP, but not weak either, they were just about right. so after realizing the playing a scout was not going to pan out I petitioned for the respec th...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 03:28:00
|
819. very pleased with 1.4 dev blog - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Very, very pleased well worth the wait. Keep up the good work CCP, youve really been turning around uprising. Still not as fun as chrome but i have faith 1.5 will change that. Anyone agree? I agree, ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 03:10:00
|
820. A serious question to all drivers and pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
echo47 wrote: What is it or was it about tanks or dropships that made you want to spec into them? As someone who occasionaly plays in an AV fit from start to finish, I would liketo have a better understanding of why you all feel the tools ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.08.23 03:02:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |