| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
481. Limmited ammo going to make vehical turrents more effective? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: ladwar wrote: turret* It annoys the **** out of me too. turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent turrent t...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 04:50:00
|
482. Limmited ammo going to make vehical turrents more effective? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: I gotta love that they're already trying to sell it as an improvement that we're being limited. what's next, limited fuel reserves? Taking away the recall feature? hey, im also a tanker. lol. id rather have unlimmited ammo
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 04:47:00
|
483. Limmited ammo going to make vehical turrents more effective? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Void Echo wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: The Ammo System to vehicles will just be a nice bonus. bonus to who? the tankers or you infantry? To infantry, of course. ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 04:36:00
|
484. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Void Echo wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: The Ammo System to vehicles will just be a nice bonus. bonus to who? the tankers or you infantry? To infantry, of course. ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 03:59:00
|
485. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Void Echo wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: The Ammo System to vehicles will just be a nice bonus. bonus to who? the tankers or you infantry? To infantry, of course. no to us! you see, if they limmit the ammo to limmit...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 03:49:00
|
486. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: The Ammo System to vehicles will just be a nice bonus. bonus to who? the tankers or you infantry? to Bojo! he will enjoy not getting hit by: DJINN Rampage wrote: I missile tank. it's called "Core ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 02:22:00
|
487. can we half the price of tank equippiment - in General Discussions [original thread]
half the price? i dunno about that. Reduce the price on select turrents maby. Make enforcer tanks the vaule they are worth on the feild, free
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 01:50:00
|
488. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Exmaple Core, you are needed here: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1307384 bam
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 01:39:00
|
489. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReSuRgAM DEI wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Viktor Zokas wrote: Look son, tanks. Don't worry about them, they are mostly harmless, especially the missile ones. :( 1.5 is getting closer!! lol its funny because when I run with legend, he ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 01:27:00
|
490. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ace Starburst wrote: Concept art of 1.5 Tanks hahahah
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 00:51:00
|
491. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: actually as a scout I fear Missile turrets more than blasters. Most people can't aim worth crap with em, so I hop my way out of issues. But I came across an actually decent missile user but I was thin...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 00:50:00
|
492. Gunnlogi technically obsolete? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tank Missile wrote: My missile Gunnlogi tears up Madrugar b-hole on a regular basis, hardly obsolete. i doubt it. My falshion, enforcer 3 proto missiles with a damage mod cant kill the better armor tankers. They close the distance and kill me...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 00:36:00
|
493. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: actually as a scout I fear Missile turrets more than blasters. Most people can't aim worth crap with em, so I hop my way out of issues. But I came across an actually decent missile user but I was thinking, "Can't touch th...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 00:33:00
|
494. Sadness till 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Zokas wrote: Look son, tanks. Don't worry about them, they are mostly harmless, especially the missile ones. :( 1.5 is getting closer!!
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.17 00:28:00
|
495. DJINN LEUOKPLAST is afraid of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
being afraid of tanks in dust? LOL
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 17:22:00
|
496. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this ph...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 06:44:00
|
497. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: Anyone who says tanks do not need infantry support is a fool, I am so glad you took tanks out of the hands of Blam after he said that. Even the M1 abrams needs infantry support,...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 05:50:00
|
498. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this phenomena happen? Also, wasent attacking the AR assa...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 04:57:00
|
499. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: man... this community cant do anything right. I ask "why arent tanks allowed to be seccessful but infaintry is?" and everyone answers with other complants about tanks. sucks Your answer is right the...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 04:07:00
|
500. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
man... this community cant do anything right. I ask "why arent tanks allowed to be seccessful but infaintry is?" and everyone answers with other complants about tanks. sucks
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 03:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |